This is a thread for ecchi drawn by female artists. Bonus points if it is a mascot/self portrait/ self insert OC >what is the appeal 1) There is a certain way only girls draw girls that is pretty endearing 2) Female artists self inserting themselves into lewd situations or using themselves as reference is hot, especially if they are dorky and bullyable in real life >How to find Try to stick to ones that state themselves or it is stated for them with certainty that they are girls. You can use some context clues like hearing their voice in a stream, a jp name that ends with ko, a fujo work or two, etc, but try to not post unless you are 90% sure. If you are not sure, ask itt first.
>PLEASE DO NOT POST ANY WORK BY FTM, MTF, OR SOMEONE WITH A THEY/THEM BIO; PLEASE AVOID ANY POSTERS TRYING TO BAIT A GENDER IDENTITY ARGUMENT.
>>2974048 This thread is pretty meaningless if you don't state the artist with each pic, and the proof of femininity.
Especially since quite a few male artists pretend to be female to lure in otaku likes, so an artist's word alone cannot be believed without reliable external validation.
>>2974242 Yeah, that is an unusual name for a guy. Usually that would be Naruki. There are some male names that end with ko, so it is not 100% foolproof, but ko is usually reserved for feminine names.
>>2974601 How the hell did you find the patreon exclusive beast shit before you found out her name Also god dammit anon the name is in the literally in the op
>>2974613 I search for names by @ names on twitter. If not for specifc artists, I search by character, either trying to remeber there name and or defining points of appearance. For example with the character, I look with the tag Swirling_glasses, and that brought me to the artist and character. As for what with the mention of the Patreon Exculsive shit. People post it on other sites I am sure you are aware.
>>2974735 yeah, the japanese artists dont look like that either because thats a cartoon that doesnt really look like anybody. maybe you forgot about that?
>>2974026 >>2974028 >>2974040 >>2974041 does anyone have her irl stuff? she was briefly (and by brief i mean like 1 minute before deleting) photos on twitter but couldn’t be fucked to spend hours refreshing the page
This artist (ariekochan) recently posted a nsfw commission after getting more ecchi with it, they seem kind of embarrassed by it but I think given how fantastic it looks kind of proves op's point about women just drawing it with more knowledge
>>2977134 Nice find! Knowledge is a big one. Sometimes they put a certain feeling and personality into it too. I am pretty sure some of my favorite doujinshi artists are female but they just never stated it anywhere
This one is tricky. I have always remembered Kamiya Tomoe to be a female artist, but they are a very old artist and have been active for so long that I don't remember where my evidence for this thinking came from. They have accounts and pages everywhere, from pixiv to nicovideos and I couldn't find what I wanted I think.
Zucchini is well known to be female. Or is stated to be such on FB and I've yet to see anyone say otherwise.
Bonus: For some reason the Hello Project wiki for Morning Musume has a page for Shining Musume which implies h-artist Shiwasu no Okina is a woman. But all evidence I could find implies the contrary. Would be the most perverted woman in Japan if true.
Femoids, I apologize, I should have never have said what I said about you. This thread is undeniable proof of your personhood in all of its magnificence. These drawings bring me to tears; they are beautiful, and they elicit in me emotions that I cannot simply reduce to physiological, hormonal effects.
>>3008505 Literally the opposite IRL. The only times she does her gf is when his bf is fucking her, the rest of the time she just gets cock. Yes, she is also poly.
>>2975937 don't go crazy looking for it. She admitted soon after those were references she saved from Pinterest and such. I saved a few, image searched, and she was telling the truth
>>3008612 are tentacles like this allowed on /e/? Genuine question. I just double checked the sticky and while it doesn't mention tentacles, couldn't they fall under /d/? Not trying to start shit, mind you
>>3014606 I wouldn't even trust this. I've heard some artists will hire women to attend panels and cons and markets and whatever pretending to be the artist. Not to mention AI, or just plain old photoshop. The only thing you can trust for this is your gut and detective work, I'd reckon.
>>3011676 I'd say tentacles are ecchi when non-penetrative, and hentai when penetrative. Dividing factor is do you need censorship. If you do - hentai, if not needed, ecchi.
This allows for stuff like that tentacle wizard manga to massage/tease girls and stay ecchi, but when the tentacle monster is full on gang raping the girl - that is clear hentai/smut.
>>3019786 >>3019846 I'm going to explain this slowly for you. This is Chika Ogiue from the series Genshiken. She draws manga. The joke in this image is that she's using her own body as a reference for drawing naked women in her manga, but she has a rather unappealing body and it makes her sad. The topic of the thread we're in is ecchi drawn by female artists, with "bonus points" being given if the ecchi art is a mascot/self portrait/self insert OC. In the picture, Oguie (a female artist) has drawn ecchi art. Said ecchi art is based on her own body, therefore making them self portraits/inserts. Therefore the picture itself meets the thread topic in a humorous way (the ecchi image itself contains both a female artist AND said female artist's own ecchi art)
>>3025186 The picture's pretty self explanatory on its own without the history lesson. Most people on the pink boards are too cumbrained to actually us their brainpower for much of anything.
>>3025223 You're too cumbrained to deliver a joke properly but I'm not going to derail a good thread arguing about this, so consider this my last (You).
I've always wondered if men and women draw ecchi differently. I always liked to believe to believe women could do it better because they have they know the secrets of a woman's body.
>>2974073 do they really not understand that someone posting "marry me" does not constitute a marriage proposal? is this why you always hear about people receiving """death threats"""?
I once saw this artist get into an argument with someone on xitter. People were piling on her for experimenting with AI-generated, photorealistic backgrounds as a base to draw over in her finished work. She responded to some of the russian comments in russian and consistently used female pronouns when referring to herself. She never explicitly announced her gender anywhere else, and those posts were later removed, which leads me to believe she is, in fact, a woman. Take that as you will.
>>3054010 In a country where I from it means "come here, kitty". You say it when you want to feed a cat. This is why I cant even read it as what it is supposed to be.
Allegedly female artist. I wish her art was publicly available, in between gelbooru, kemono and exhentai, everything is incomplete and even together they're still missing a lot of content.
>>3062066 >>3062067 I wouldn't trust this, given how it's clearly AI. Hate to be so cynical, but I'd guess it's a guy calling himself a girl to drum up popularity. Could be wrong, but who knows.
>>3065614 I feel like its been remarkably consistent with a bunch of original designs, the frequency at which they do upload does lead to me being suspicious sometimes but anytime I go through an ai detector it never comes up with anything
Theres alot of grain on their photos though that could be something to cover it up
>>2978467 >intercourse symbol on an armband Public sexual relief duty. Think of it along the lines of nurse armbands or those students with armbands in anime that are tasked with ensuring rules are being followed.
>>3065736 >>3072241 >>3073749 >hands dont touch the top they are supposed to be holding >pupils are different between the two pics >tops' shoulder width are different >pants' buttons are different >all the colors and shading are different >>3062066 is definitely ai. I looked up her other pic and they are a lot more consistent with each other and >>3062067 so I assume it's a real artist trying out ai.