source?

>>77206989
Isn't hair related stuff polygenetic. Like you can sure get good hair genes from your mom and your grandpa, uncle from mother's side may have a full head of hair in their 60s

but if you inherit two or more of say high baseline test or med to high dht sensitivity or high fat carrying capacity or being a light sleeper it basically counteracts all the work of the other good genes you had.

That's why they call it genetic lottery

>>77206989
bruh how does this help me, all grand pas are fucking bald nigga

>>77206989
>dad is norwood 6
>uncle on mother's side is norwood 2-3 and grandpa at 85 still has more hair than my father
you better be right

>>77207105
It's bullshit. My mother's father had full head of hair in his 80s and my uncle from that side doesn't even have white hair in his 60s. My father's side went Norwood 3-4 at 50. Guess who went Norwood 5 at 30yo

>The best indicator of male pattern baldness is your mother's father, brother, uncle, etc as well your mother's own hairline and hair density. /fit/ anons still deny this eternal trvke.

Personnal experience

My mother's father and uncle : heads full of hair well into their 70's
My father, my father's father and uncles : all bald
Me and my brother : both bald/balding

>mother's father
doesnt have the same mtDNA as your mother
your mother's mother's brother does though

Genetics arent a concrete or definite science like mathematics it relies on anecdote extremely since they unironically still cannot just take a look at your skin or hair or any sample and just be like this guy has sequence AGCAA.... in x spot and y has AGCGA, x has this hue of blonde and y has this hue of brown hair and this is a common observation accross n=x....
They just pop that shit into methylene blue and a computer and do the most basic of chromatographies which is extremely faulty considering all the artefacts and that the machine just compares the light between two given samples, they dont have an actual standard or spectrum or bank for a certain sequence it's just very rough estimates

Also your Mtdna mutates like a dozen times more than nuclear dna good look predicting anything with that

There's a reason ethnic/racial studies rely on y-dna more than mtdna.

all the men on mums side are norwoods but im not. gg.

>>77207115
Why are you such a useless retard? Go away

File: Screenshot_20260416_145439_Gallery.jpg (369.8 KB)

369.8 KB JPG

>>77206989
Dunno here's my Grandpa from my mother's side in his early 30s, meanwhile dad, second grandpa and me are Norwood 1 or 2.

>>77207105
chaim and chomponsky

>>77206989
My mother had three brothers, one was full cueball by age 40, one is now in his 60s and hasn't lost a single follicle, the other was slightly balding around the temples and died age 50. My dad is 70 and only started thinning noticably in the past ten years. I'll be 40 this year and my hairline is holding firm so far. It's a complete lottery.

>>77207105
theres no source, how about googling nigga
its genetics, SCIENCE nigga
get reaaal

>>77206989
All the men on my mom's side are mega bald.
My dad side all the men are bald.
Me?
Started balding at 17.

>>77207587
Based and Aeropilled Baldmaxxer

seems true, my mothers brother and her father are not bald while everyone on my dads side is GIGA bald, my cousin literally had nw 6 by 22y.

meanwhile i have a full head of hair at 26y

>>77206989
My mom's side almost every man is NW7 bald by 32. Currently 38 and still at Norwood 2.5 or so.
OP is gay

>>77207105
It's retarded broscience. Some retard made it up and even bigger retards repeat it.