Thread #77211879
File: pkdzlh7ej58a1.jpg (269.5 KB)
269.5 KB JPG
Want some variation for eggs, and I'm too poor for frequent mass consumption of beef, venison, and lamb.
So I'm looking at pork, which seems to work for tigers (technically they eat boars, but tomato tomato).
Any cons I should be aware of?
25 RepliesView Thread
>>
>>77211879
The only con is taste. pork fat is kind of heavy and flat on the palate in a way complementary to the way goat or mutton fat is heavy in the front of the palate. Protein is protein my bro. .
Ethically I think pigs are smarter than ovids and cattle so I am morally against it but whatever. Eat your pork.
>>
>>
File: file.png (655.8 KB)
655.8 KB PNG
>>77211879
Someone here once said that chicken is the most cost-effective option for bulking. I dunno if that's still true, but if you're poor then it might still work.
Also, post more tiger inspo.
>>
File: Top-7-Pork-Cuts.jpg (208.9 KB)
208.9 KB JPG
>>77211879
>Any cons I should be aware of?
Not really, it has a bit fewer lean cuts but that's it.
>>
>>
>>
File: 513115857_679696188452503_7209348201647708303_n.jpg (44.5 KB)
44.5 KB JPG
>>77212077
Nah, tigers are naturally very muscular.
>>
>>
File: 1726292118811976.jpg (81.1 KB)
81.1 KB JPG
>>77212077
You motherfuckers see roids everywhere.
>>
>>77211890
>taste
Idk about that. I actually like pork more than beef, beef tastes meh, whereas pork's taste is rich. To each their own tho.
On topic tho, I don't think OP will have any issues with bulking on pork. Also, while it's relatively fat, you render quite a lot of fat while cooking, so most of it will stay in the pan.
>>
File: 1726818353610898.jpg (185.2 KB)
185.2 KB JPG
>>77212118
>skips leg day
>>
>>
File: pulledporktacos-7.jpg (288.8 KB)
288.8 KB JPG
I recommend slow cooking pork tenderloin in a chili based broth (similar to birria). Then making tacos with them.
>>
>>
>>
>>77212723
this guy knows what's up
>>77211879
get a slow-cooker. it's an absolute game changer for cheap, tough cuts of meat
>>
>>
>>
File: file.jpg (945.7 KB)
945.7 KB JPG
>>77212153
Maybe that cat just needed to cut.
>>
>>77211890
>ethically I think pigs are smarter than ovids and cattle so I am morally against it
Fuck that bullshit. A pig would eat you if it had the chance. Ask any pig farmer. You pass out in a chicken or cow enclosure you're gonna be ok. You pass out in a pig enclosure and you're lunch.
>>
File: file.jpg (3.1 MB)
3.1 MB JPG
>>77213261
Apparently a tiger's hind legs are longer than their forelegs, hence the ability to jump 20 to 30 feet.
(Admittedly I learned that from the site I grabbed this picture from. Still, now we know how to tigermaxx.)
>>
>>
>>
>>77211879
Are people who write questions like this actually serious? Like, what 3rd world country are you from that you think of food like this? Animals don't have magical properties m8... You can literally just google the macros of whatever piece of pork you are eating, and make it fit within your day. There is no such thing as an animal that is "good for gains" or "bad for gains", that is not how human metabolism works, lol. It's just..., an animal. You think a lot of cuts of pork are too fatty? Buy a leaner cut of pork. Turn your own brain on for 5 seconds.