They are so solid they don't need any gay design or designer to improve their business

>>459816
yeah, it is also closer to a global critical infrastructure than a consoomer brand so it does not need a logomark that is legible in google results as a 16px favicon for seo upboats or a social media roundel for ultra low bass phonk tiktok twerk videos.

>>459781
id make the wafer gold colored for xtra bling

Have the letters uppercase. Move the disc to the left of them or get rid of it. Make the disc more minimal.

The logo is poor, it works poorly in reductions and it doesn't connect me with "technology", I could easily think it's a world bingo championship

>>459781
Logo looks like it was designed in 15 minutes in 1999 by a geek with no design experience. Definitely dated

But like >>459817 said, would a company like this really even need a good logo if they are not appealing to consumers?

>>460195
The hell do you want them to do with a logo, make it another garbage transparent “simplistic” sociopathic mess like all other logos today? No thank you prick

>>460186
>it doesn't connect me with "technology"
It's a wafer, and to anybody familiar with them (tsmc is not a consumer facing company so their customers definitely are), that speaks "technology" audibly.

>>460196
>The hell do you want them to do with a logo
redesign for fun, look at the thread. the board, and fuck off

>>459781
I instinctively interpret the black dies as being the defective ones and wonder what the designer was thinking.

>>462038
the designer was thinking filled and empty cells in a semiconductor crystal lattice

>>462039
But dies are removed from a wafer a row at a time, so the scattered holes don't make any sense.

>>462042
you either didn't read my message properly or need to research how semiconductors and doping work...

>>459781
Do you still wanna see redesigns?

>JYNAX

>>459781
tismuc

>>460186
>and it doesn't connect me with "technology", I could easily think it's a world bingo championship
consoomer breainlet detected. it works as advertised, you got instantly filtered out.
those who'd get into business with them instantly see the chip waver.

File: boeing-logo.png (18.8 KB)

>>463004
LMAO

>People whose job is procurement in the "global critical infrastructure" biz who by default deal with a very limited number of suppliers *need* a representative logo graphic like a fucking kindergarten student so they will associate that product class with X company...rather than just knowing who is in that small pool....

>BUT it is also of the highest priority that that representational mark also be deliberately made inscrutable to all but those particular insider specialists so as to "filter out" anyone else who isnt a direct customer who might happen to notice it and might *gasp* discern what business they are in if it's too recognizable.

No need, it just werks.

>>462043
>doping
why are my computer chips doing drugs???

File: 1752452843566969.png (1.9 MB)

it looks good on the sign

>>463082
it looks good in general!
super distinctive, while oozing 'lasting professionalism' and loudly screaming 'engineering'

>they are not catering to the consumer market.

>285 days of catalog presence
>not a single attempt
What is even the point of this board

I really like it

>>463085
idk bro some of these boards on this website are retarded. Couldn't this whole board be a general on ic?

File: tsmc.png (22.1 KB)

>>459781
im not saying its good. im saying i was bored and spent 2 minutes on canva.

File: Untitled-1.jpg (294.5 KB)

>>463251
Appreciated that someone tried at least.

I did a basic flat modernization of the logo they have currently. Very uninspired and unpolished, but I saw the thread and got the itch to do this real quick. I might come back to do a real redesign when I get back to my real workstation.

Found it pretty hard to get other ideas than what they are currently using because I don't really understand what the company makes or how they make it.