>>18516360
Lol.

File: Varginha Alien.png (443.9 KB)

>>18516360
>SSA have 19% Ghost dna
Because they fucked the Holy ghost

File: 1000002383.png (100.9 KB)

>>18516360

This is literally just Nigerians.

>>18516688
>SSA have 19% Ghost dna
You are illiterate. The study said the average was 2-19% percent and explicitly suggested the true average to be 7%. Also, there's allegedly some evidence suggesting that sahelians(who don't have this phenotype at all) have the most ghost DNA, though I've yet to see it and honestly don't buy that.

File: archaic.png (538.5 KB)

>>18516360
>Why do west africans look like this?
monkey genetics

>>18517375
> Homo Erectus or Homo Habilis
> NOT found in the dna of present-day Asians or Caucasians
Both initially unfounded, and today, definitely false claims.

File: Screenshot_20260429_173443_Chrome.jpg (162.7 KB)

>>18517506

File: F2.medium.gif (24.8 KB)

>>18517508

File: Screenshot_20260429_174310_Chrome.jpg (254.9 KB)

>>18517513
Successfully predicted the Erectus-Denisovan-Abbo link. Suggests the Ghost DNA in West-Africans to come from Homo Rhodesiensis

File: Screenshot_20260429_173314_Chrome.jpg (60.6 KB)

>>18517518
>>18517372

File: 20260607_194751.jpg (727.5 KB)

>>18517375
Potentially related to this nigga.

File: 20260607_194753.jpg (596.6 KB)

>>18517527

File: archaic introgression.png (216.2 KB)

>>18517506
>false claims
you are wrong, read the paper

>>18517778
Your screenshot doesn't support either of those claims, and I've already posted quotes that contradict them (one the same paper!).

>>18517780
*one from the same paper

>>18517778
>>18517780
As a matter of fact, your snippet actually contradicts the claim that the ghost DNA comes from either Erectus or Habilis, given that the two significantly predate the oldest possible split date shown.

>>18517780
>>18517781
I am sorry that you are dealing with being effectively illiterate, unable to process complex text, but what I posted is a screen cap from the paper, and it does in fact state that you are a monkey. Your apparent mental disability is probably because of your monkey genetics, so you have my sympathy.

>>18517786
> but what I posted is a screen cap from the paper
I obviously know that, given that I have posted two screencaps from the very same paper.

> and it does in fact state that you are a monkey
I specifically refuted the claims in >>18517375 regarding the identity of the archiac hominid in question and it's presence among other populations, which was very easy, as the paper in question does not support them.

You're either retarded or trolling.

File: archaic introgression.png (486.1 KB)

>>18517789
I am sorry that you are illiterate, but that is in fact what the genetic research proves.

>>18516360
What, muscular hypertrophy while being bald? That's not really a specifically west African thing. It iirc has to do with an ease in muscle-building due to high adrogen levels. You see it alot with people who do steroids and PEDs.
Why exactly West Africans are affected by them to such a degree I have no fucking idea.

>>18517805
Maybe they chew a whole lot or smt.

>>18517794
You're clearly trolling, but just to make how wrong you are even clearer to any on-lookers:

> didn't get the monkey genetics you got
OOA sits well within the introgression range, with other findings from that very paper alongside later one's favoring a pre-OOA introduction
>>18517513
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.03.709416v1.full
>>18517508


> 11%
Also from the same paper:
>>18517522
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7015685/#:~:text=Multiple%20West%20African%20populations%20inherited,in%20human%20populations%20(1).
It's also worth mentioning that somewhat similar studies were done on both blacks and whites prior to us having archaic hominid DNA, and it gave (incorrect) suggestions of 5% for both. We won't actually be able to determine the archaic admixture in blacks until we get Rhodensiensis DNA.

>>18517815
Your only angle is trying to claim europeans also have the same monkey DNA contamination, but there is no evidence for it. The rest you don't deny, because you know its all true. And the admixture time could be much more recent, as recent as 6k years ago. Blacks may have been picking up monkey DNA as recently as 6k years ago.

File: homo erectus.png (530.8 KB)

>>18517375
>>18517794
As if we needed genetic science to tell us this. Anyone whose seen Africans has gotten that uncanny valley simian cousin vibe from them, even if you aren't consciously racist.