>>2682020 >>2682076 >>2682202 All these feel like prime examples of why dick pics are the biggest collective optical illusion humanity's manage to pull. These three all have completely different lengths but if I didn't see the rulers I'd say they all look within an inch of each other
>>2681645 You're needlessly digging the ruler into your putenda there. Everyone knows the official rule for penis measuring is to get some yarn. Start it at the anus, wrap it three times around the balls, and then extend it just past the tip. Then you just measure your yarn and you have your length.
>>2688220 Then why did you post it, huh? In fact, why are any of you stupid fucking faggots posting your own cocks? This isn't /soc/. Read the fucking sticky.
>>2681472 Putting the ruler on the side of your dick will make it seem bigger than if you put the ruler over your dick. t. 7 inches but 8 inches if I do this trick
>>2688190 Your measurement is a little skewed - ruler should be perpendicular to pubic bone, but you have it angled there (as such, it's adding a bit of length). That said, you have a categorically big ahh dick. Consistently thick girth throughout + above average length...
What do women usually tell you about it? Assuming you're sexually active with them, that is.
>>2697585 OP here. Long and thin. Slight upward curve. Usually sits between 6-7 inches long depending on body fat and arousal. Girth has always been something I’m self conscious of. At the thinnest part it’s 11cm (or 4.3 inches) around.
>>2684697 For scientific purposes, that's what you're supposed to do. I know effective length is base to tip but scientific length starts from the pubic bone
>>2699418 you can post yourself, you just can't explicitly say "this is me". even if it's implied, it's not against the rules if there's nothing to directly prove it.
>>2704654 Why? Most people in this thread are around that range. Even the ones that are smaller are generally also not measuring correctly to get their full length.
If anything I would guess a lot of the guys here are bigger than 5.5. But obviously things differ a lot from region to region. It's like saying that the average male height globally is 5'7. Like, in aggregate of literally all men, that might be true, but if you're comparing it to a Western European average, it looks short in comparison.
>>2704706 That's what I mean, the average seems way higher. I'm here in the NL and 90% of the time I see a "small" guy it's because he's fat and measuring NBP.
>>2704726 Well, a thread about posting penis measurements is obviously going to be biased towards a certain sort of person (technically no one should be posting themselves but we know that's not true). I don't think it's "way higher", unless you'd consider like, 5.75 to 6.25 to be that. There are some 7 inch+ monsters in here but most people are comfortably like 5-6 inches, so basically in the pocket of average. Frankly I was expecting it to be all impossibly huge guys and was sort of pleasantly surprised to see mostly regular sizes here.