File: lena-soderberg-topless.jpg (910.9 KB)

910.9 KB JPG

Here's one the zoomies probably don't know about

> Lenna (or Lena) is a standard test image used in the field of digital image processing, starting in 1973.[1] It is a picture of the Swedish model Lena Forsén, shot by photographer Dwight Hooker and cropped from the centerfold of the November 1972 issue of Playboy magazine.

> Alexander Sawchuk estimates that it was in June or July of 1973 when he, then an assistant professor of electrical engineering at the University of Southern California Signal and Image Processing Institute (SIPI), along with a graduate student and the SIPI lab manager, was hurriedly searching the lab for a good image to scan for a colleague's conference paper. They got tired of their stock of usual test images, dull stuff dating back to television standards work in the early 1960s. They wanted something glossy to ensure good output dynamic range, and they wanted a human face. Just then, somebody happened to walk in with a recent issue of Playboy. The engineers tore away the top third of the centerfold so they could wrap it around the drum of their Muirhead wirephoto scanner, which they had outfitted with analog-to-digital converters (one each for the red, green, and blue channels) and a Hewlett Packard 2100 minicomputer. The Muirhead had a fixed resolution of 100 lines per inch and the engineers wanted a 512×512 image, so they limited the scan to the top 5.12 inches of the picture, effectively cropping it at the subject's shoulders.

> To explain why the image became a standard in the field, David C. Munson, editor-in-chief of IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, stated that it was a good test image because of its detail, flat regions, shading, and texture. He also noted that "the Lena image is a picture of an attractive woman. It is not surprising that the (mostly male) image processing research community gravitated toward an image that they found attractive."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenna

>>5198327
didn’t know Marilyn Monroe did this kinda stuff

>>5198398
Awhile back there was a bunch of furor over this, declaring it sexist to use the image now. I still have it on my Github as part of an image analysis project. Hope I'm never discovered.

>>5198496
homesick for a place that no longer exists

>>5198496
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tennis_Girl

File: IMG_1074.jpg (589.2 KB)

589.2 KB JPG

Not nude but still iconic.

File: IMG_1077.jpg (4.1 MB)

4.1 MB JPG

Not a photo but still iconic.

>>5198502
"Hireath"
But what's that got to do with the picture?
Or thread?

>>5198806
the picture is from the time which no longer exists

>>5198799
wasnt this one in The Flintstones movie or was it the wallpaper on Nedry's pc in Jurassic Park?

File: IMG_1101.jpg (912.5 KB)

912.5 KB JPG

>>5198878

>>5198801
Very iconic.

>>5199115
Did they not pay her enough for BSG?

>>5198398
Professional gooning.

>>5199209
>>5199214
Yesssss

File: Madonna 1992.jpg (1.6 MB)

1.6 MB JPG

>>5198327

File: Lena Söderberg 1972.jpg (3.4 MB)

3.4 MB JPG

>>5198398

>>5198799
Need more.cheesecake from Esquire magazine. I would read it as a kid but dont have any cash for a subscription.

File: IMG_1384.jpg (494.1 KB)

494.1 KB JPG

>>5199665

madonna has never been attractive

File: IMG_1343.jpg (163.5 KB)

163.5 KB JPG

This image made it into 1999's Silent Hill video-game.

Bettie Page

>>5200374
One does not nut to Madonna because of her looks, one nuts to Madonna because its Madonna.

t. Anon who has nutted to every Madonna nude/naked/topless image/video including the recent ones where she's ooooold.

>>5200510
She was cute as-fuck back in the day.

>>5200387
god bless larry flint

>>5200510
>>5200524
gross and wrong

>>5200889
Try and stop me, I have ejaculated more to 65 year old Madonna in a week than you in a lifetime of jerking to 18 year old onlyfans models.

you're a hag fag we get it now die of aids already

>>5200889
>larry flint
That was Hustler.
Bob Guccione was Penthouse.

>>5201106
that's the joke

>>5198801
Pretty iconic ngl

>>5198327
God she's fucking hideous

>>5201441
There, yes. But in reality she was a goddess.

File: 1673547410_4.png (2.1 MB)

2.1 MB PNG

>>5198327

File: 1672414311.png (2.5 MB)

2.5 MB PNG

>>5201464

>>5201464
>>5201465
She ruins everything she touches.

>>5201429
>joke
Yeah... that's it. It was a joke.

>>5201465

Come on, man, stop posting shitty AI upscales, this is /hr/

File: post-65198-0-35895300-1442141366.jpg (543.1 KB)

543.1 KB JPG

>>5201465
Tyra's SI was the proper nubian-goddess.

File: yLt7UkJx_o4e4e7e7caa4a66db.jpg (149 KB)

149 KB JPG

Emma Stone

>>5201865
Fuck yes

>>5204585
>When a newbie thinks more pixels means hi-res

>>5198801
Where can I print a 24-by-36 of this, no questions asked?

>>5204618
Kinko's or similar office print shop. Just make sure there's no copyright claim on it.

>>5206158
When a moron doesn't know the definition of "nude".

>>5206159
When a fucktard doesn't know the definition of "nude".

>>5206191
When a fucktard moron doesn't know the definition of "nude".

>>5206198
When a complete and total fucktard moron doesn't know the definition of "nude".

File: IMG_0668.jpg (262.2 KB)

262.2 KB JPG

>>5206200
>>5206201
>>5206202
>>5206203
There aren't that many iconic nudes out there, I suppose.

>>5206359
Man the amount of spunk I spilled to that one... unquantifiable

>>5206359
I printed this out at my dad's union office in 2001 but the printer had no color and it looked like a vintage playboy shot. good memories.

>>5201940
Damn! I was coming here to post this one.

File: GYhEqpwXQAAMTck.jpg (239.7 KB)

239.7 KB JPG

>>5206359
seeing as you posted an iconic fake, I'll post one too.

>>5206536
Did they even have Photoshop back then?

>>5206544
>Did they even have Photoshop back then?
Since you asked...
A: Photoshop has been around since 1990.
B: Old photos can be altered at any point, after they're made.
C: They were editing photos to narrow waistlines back in the Victorian era.

File: 68176_jb6_122_674lo.jpg (370.6 KB)

370.6 KB JPG

I hate how much editing there is but Jolene is hot.

>>5199673
I wonder if /p/ uses that photo for calibration.

File: Maria Ryabushkina.jpg (753.2 KB)

753.2 KB JPG

>>5207150

>>5201372
funniest leak

>>5207404
Mom!

File: christina-aguilera-8dbyzmk7rs.jpg (4.7 MB)

4.7 MB JPG

The greatest.

>>5207150
>>5207151
I don't think anything that explicit could ever be iconic.

File: 1463446340463.jpg (1.1 MB)

1.1 MB JPG

I wish the photographer would republish this as a poster or post the negative scan online.

File: DemiMooreAfZC.jpg (1.8 MB)

1.8 MB JPG

>>5208483

>>5208488
I would call that artistic, and yes I would so hard and all week.

>>5208482
Instaboner.

File: Paolo-Roversi-5.jpg (60.4 KB)

60.4 KB JPG

>>5198328
damn could never find this one in hi-res
thanks anon

>>5209373
>Paolo Roversi
Dude needs his own thread, esp. the nude series. Love his work. /p/

>>5198328
>>5209373
Kino kino KINO, Kate is unbelievable.

File: Kate_Moss-Paolo_Roversi-02.jpg (333.5 KB)

333.5 KB JPG

>>5209444

>>5201372
Saved for the nostalgia. Thanks anon

>>5208137
>they cgi'd her naked for this
Genuinely pissed off. One of the tv edits in some foreign country used the unedited version where she is wearing some actual clothes for it you can find online

>>5209455
Get a load of this fat ass

>>5211260
Jay-Law is so underrated.

>>5211260
>>5211277

Queen of the mids

>>5208481
>>5208482
>>5208484
dirrty era christina was the fucking best

>>5211497
Truth.

>>5211424
Go outside and actually look at the average woman. Lawrence is anything but mid. Porn and filters have ruined your perception.

>>5211879
She's certainly mid for a celeb though.

>>5199145
Stars don't do Playboy for the money, though there is some decent cash involved. They do it for the fame and bragging rights.
Playboy does everything to make them look awesome, including airbrushing, and never put out a photo that the star does not approve of.
Doing Playboy basically make a sex icon of a basic television star.