>>7927950 It inspires me to continue the grind. Would I do the same just to be able to draw any other image itt? Definitely not. >>7927954 holy triggered
>>7928409 What's the error, I recall seeing it being redlined before, but I've clearly forgotten. Can't be too bad of a mistake if 99% of people aren't going to notice anything and think the image is good.
>>7928686 the rear spikes of the crown do not conform to the perspective set by the front of the crown. But you could argue this was a purposeful decision by the artist to angle the crown but still represent the rear spikes. Artists especially in the pasts make decisions like that all the time. If you have to break a rule to achieve what you want to present you're free to do so. But people in a hundred years whove never pinted anything worth looking at will call you beg and recommend draw a box
The original Ken Sugimori Gen 1 Pokemon illustrations and designs were so GOATed, and thinking over it as an adult made me realize how the series has really lost touch with that genius more than my own nostalgia. The limited GB screen space made for a need to emphasize only a few strong, prominent features emphasizing form over details, and the color pallet emphasizes values and contrast, using heavy highlights to give the simplistic figures depth without a need for heavy shadows (which would have limited the amount of "colors" a Pokemon could have on a black-and-white screen) while still reading as having a solid coloring that could easily be replicated.
It's genius in simplicity for character design that I'm blown away by and want to eventually replicate in my own work.
>>7927864 this is diarrhea dookie, go ahead and ejaclimate. let the post cum clarity settle in and realise your mistake worthy of a month's penance of embarrassment
>>7931224 >posters haven't been a thing at all since 2010s You're opinion isn't even worth considering when you say something this objectively retarded. Posters aren't a thing? Get the fuck outta here. It's fine to disagree, but to so blatantly lie to try and make your point is pathetic, my dude.
>>7932751 >"You have outdated references and lingo" >"go back to collecting stamps" Let me guess; old in age, but young in spirit? Try not to spit out your dentures as you yell while calling other people old.
>>7933030 >No No No, I called you old FIRST! I was pointing out your hypocrisy, but it seems your aged dull mind didn't pick up what I was putting down. Also, I don't give a shit that you did it first, you decrepit old boy.
>>7933084 Oh, you're one of those faggots who start vague posting when they get butt mad. I don't care how old or young you are, this is some of this most juvenile shit out there.
