File: 1776955253570380.png (203.2 KB)
>Thread theme: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOljYeqrjqU
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-limits-us e-race-redistricting-win-republican s-rcna245856
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Wednesday further weakened the Voting Rights Act, ruling that a congressional map in Louisiana was a racial gerrymander even though it was drawn to comply with the landmark law aimed at protecting minority voters.
The justices, split 6-3 with the court's conservatives in the majority, told states they can almost never consider race when drawing maps to comply with Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which was enacted to protect minority voters who long faced discrimination in elections.
Conservative Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the majority, said that while there may be extreme situations where the use of race can be justified to draw a map, it was not in the Louisiana case. As a result, the new map was an "unconstitutional racial gerrymander," he added.
The decision means Louisiana will need to redraw its map. Other states could try to do so as well, although there is little time this year with primaries underway ahead of November’s midterm congressional elections. Louisiana's primary is May 16, just two weeks away.
While the court had previously assumed that states could consider race in seeking to comply with the Voting Rights Act, Alito wrote that "allowing race to play any part in government decision-making represents a departure from the constitutional rule that applies in almost any other context."
In justifying the court's change of course, Alito highlighted developments in recent years, including "social change" in the South, where most of the race-based redistricting challenges arise. He also cited the court's 2019 decision that paved the way to unfettered partisan gerrymandering.
Showing all 209 replies.
>>
>>1510441
As a result, when civil rights plaintiffs challenge newly-drawn maps, the state can argue as a defense that it was merely seeking to maximize partisan advantage. In the South in particular, party preference is often aligned with race, with most Black people voting for Democrats.
In a separate concurring opinion, conservative Justice Clarence Thomas, a longtime critic of the Voting Rights Act, said the ruling should "largely put an end" to a system that he saw as unlawfully dividing people into districts based on race.
The three liberal justices dissented, with Justice Elena Kagan writing that the "consequences are likely to be far-reaching and grave and that the ruling effectively "renders Section 2 all but a dead letter."
"Under the court’s new view of Section 2, a state can, without legal consequence, systematically dilute minority citizens’ voting power," Kagan said.
"The Supreme Court betrayed Black voters, they betrayed America, and they betrayed our democracy," said Derrick Johnson, president of NAACP, a leading civil rights group. "This ruling is a major setback for our nation and threatens to erode the hard-won victories we’ve fought, bled, and died for."
The court has taken chunks out of the Voting Rights Act twice via major rulings issued in 2013 and 2021. In 2023, the court, in an unexpected decision that appeared to buttress the voting law, struck down Republican drawn congressional districts in Alabama.
The court ruled in the Louisiana case that the state unlawfully considered race when it redrew its congressional map in 2024.
The state originally drew a map after the 2020 census that contained just one majority-Black district out of six in a state in which a third of the population is Black.
>>
>>1510442
A lower court found that the map violated the Voting Rights Act, so the state redrew it in 2024 to have two majority-Black districts. The Supreme Court has now found that map to be unlawful too, but for different reasons.
The case touches upon what conservatives see as a tension between the Voting Rights Act and the Constitution’s 14th and 15th amendments, which were enacted after the Civil War to ensure equal rights for former slaves, including the right to vote.
Conservatives view those amendments as requiring an entirely “colorblind” approach to the law, a view that liberals reject.
The Louisiana case initially reached the court on a narrower legal question, but the justices themselves expanded its importance by setting a second round of oral arguments on the broader constitutional issue of whether race can be considered in redistricting when seeking to comply with the Voting Rights Act.
Louisiana, which initially defended its new map, switched sides and joined a group of self-identified “non-African-American” voters who sued to block it on constitutional grounds. The Trump administration later joined the case in support of the state.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>1510441
Democrats have a long history of packing and cracking minorities, especially in gerrymandered states like Virginia or Illinois
We should end racial consideration in voting, and have racial blind districting
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois%27s_13th_congressional_district
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois%27s_4th_congressional_district
Their congressional districts look like abstract art
>>
>>1510443
>Conservatives view those amendments as requiring an entirely “colorblind” approach to the law, a view that liberals reject.
Because they don't want equality. They want what they call "equity", which boils down to special treatment given to 'victim' classes. They've been trying this intersectionality game for decades. It never works. All it does is increase resentment and distance between groups.
>>
>>
>>1510460
That resentment and distance I mentioned, did it get better or worse over the last 30 years?
On a semi-related note, allow me to quote Yahtzee:
>You know what? A society where anyone can make jokes about anyone else and everyone laughs is a truly tolerant society. Political-correctness-charged censorship only serves to engender resentment and distance between social groups.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>1510483
>>1510484
They literally are stopping black people from having a district where they are the majority of representatives in favor of districts where they are the minority in spite of said districts literally going right down the middle of a prominent black community. This decision objectively violates the Voting Rights act that was designed to ensure this kind of shit couldn't be done to block black communities from having proper representation.
>>
>>
>>
>>1510441
anime catgirls are cool but I wish OP included a map of just how bad the districts were.
This is the map Democrats want:
https://i.imgur.com/h8GBXea.png
THAT is the insanity that Democrats are defending.
>>1510451
>>1510460
>>1510482
>>1510489
SCOTUS isn't stopping them from having a second black district. Geography is preventing them from having a black district. Without being racist, explain why Shreveport and Baton Rouge belong in the same district.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>1510532
>Without being racist, explain why Shreveport and Baton Rouge belong in the same district.
The state has a 33% black population yet only 1 district out of 6 has a majority black population. They fold and divide any black city into majority white district(s) to deny them representation. Black voters successfully sued on this grounds to get the new map, but now the supreme court has decided to shred the Voter Representation Act instead.
>>
>>1510534
I accept your concession, ZoomZoom.
>>1510535
lol what? You just got objectively BTFO. Your response doesn't even make sense. Bad bot.
>>1510542
>I'm a modern teenager and am therefore illiterate
I didn't ask you to tell me why the old map was bad. I asked you to explain why the new map is good, which is what this thread is about. Explain why Shreveport and Baton Rouge should be in the same district.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>1510559
>Multiple people call you a faggot retard
oh yeah it's definitely bots and not you being a faggot retard. You type like a retarded redditor too so you're real easy to spot. Remember when you got butthurt and would run away to different threads just to get made fun of again? That's all you, buddy. Maybe be less of a faggot retard, I dunno.
>>
>>
>>1510553
>I asked you to explain why the new map is good, which is what this thread is about. Explain why Shreveport and Baton Rouge should be in the same district.
To address the flaws of the old map and have the districts properly reflect the actual population of the state you retard.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
It'd be nice if some of the assassins going after trump could hit Alito and Thomas. I guess they they need to do that after though, or he'll just scrape the bottom of the barrel for our next 'supreme ' court judge.
>>
>>
>>
>>1510441
Reminder, per this supreme court:
>Using race as basis for college admissions: Not ok
>Using race as basis for pulling you over and arresting you: Ok
>Using race as basis for districts: Not ok
>Using race as basis for travel bans: Ok
>>
>>1510441
I really wonder why OP Is saying that this is a good thing. With ruling that Republicans can simply redraw a map they could make sure only their ancient white Christian demographic elects representatives. That and they are now postponing primaries.
Republicans can never win outright, they must always cheat. So much as a parent in the news today.
>>
>>1510735
Yeah, and? Both of the things that are OK pertain to the 14 million illegals, that we know of, in this country by the end of Biden's incompetent reign. Maybe if democrats gave more of a fuck about our nations integrity we wouldn't have ICE, CBP, DEA, etc. pulling criminals out of Minneapolis.
>>
>>
>>
>>1510741
lmao not anymore fucko. Why do you think Repubs have lost almost every election since Trump got into office? This admin is a complete and utter disaster. The half of the county that voted for Trump realized they got scammed; instead of economic stability and no new wars, we have record inflation and price spikes while we're going to war in the middle east AGAIN. And that's not even bringing up the more personal backstabs, like Trump fucking over the entire farming industry after they voted for him, or him getting in on reducing the debt only to spike it while DOGE completely failed at their jobs.
I mean for fucks sake, Trump's own district literally turned blue and you really think he still has majority support?
>>
>>
>>1510755
>He thinks Trump is making it three more years
Lmao if he's not impeached after midterms I'd still bet he has a heart attack or some shit before his term's over.
But hey enjoy your "benefits" as your financials get fucked. Gas is gonna hit $5 a gallon pretty damn soon.
>>
>>
>>1510759
Yeah he got so lucky to survive a guy who didn't even get in the same room and might not have even fired a shot considering it's looking more like the one guy wounded was from friendly fire. I'd consider it an attempt at an attempt.
Now, I wonder what exactly is your next gas bill gonna look like?
>>
>>1510441
>Base Premise: Browns need to Go
>But you can't restrict the vote
>And you can't gerrymander
>And you can't deport
>And you can't just give them the suit and sawbuck
>So your only option is to just start shooting them in the streets
They're only removing all the legal options to remove brown so that the only way for Americans to return to having a civilized first world nation is to go full fash, overturn the Constitution and vote out their own rights just so they can start shooting brown people, which was probably the point of the whole exercise. If they can get Americans to overturn their own established rights then there's nothing holding Corporate back from owning the courts, so their immigrant labor can serve a purpose for them on the way out, the same as they did on the way in by depressing wages.
>>
>>
>>
>so many Republican voters financially suffering, thus abandoning MAGA and voting for the now proven lesser of one evil now it's more than impossible for the Democrats to be any worse: only orange glazing cultists stick with their god
>the majority of people here disagree with you, >>1510741
ftfy
>>
>>1510771
>the only way for Americans to return to having a civilized first world nation is to go full fash
Thus you won't complain when a Democrat administration does the same to white rightists: after all, if they 'Fashing Up' others is fine, therefore they don't have the right to even think about complaining when the same's done to them: otherwise they never had the right to 'fash up' others in the first place.
And why should a Democrat administration let all that legislation & laws laid down by a Cheeto Mussolini go to waste?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>1510815
No community has a right to packing or cracking.
Those are gerrymandering.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois%27s_congressional_districts
We need less districts that look like Illinois thirteenth district
>>
>>1510819
>We need less districts that look like Illinois thirteenth district
Look at the map history. The issue isn't the 13th district, it used to be a much more reasonable shape. The 15th district fucking wrapped around to cannibalize what use to be the 18th and took half the 13th too. the 15th district is the fucked up one, and oh look: +20 republican. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>1510824
>And much like the republicans on the supreme court, you don't understand how the Voting Rights Act works.
It stops Republicans from winning on merit, merits like not being black and being able to steal black votes to prop up Israel
So really you're just being another antisemitic lib
>>
>>1510827
>No it makes perfect sense for 1/3rd of the population to only get 1 seat out of 6.
>My math makes so much sense stupid lib
Reminder; black voters in Louisiana literally sued to have the new district created on the grounds they were unfairly underrepresented.
>>
>>
>>1510830
>and now that's illegal and should be rightfully reverted glad you agree that law is everything
They already ruled their underrpresentation was illegal. But now they also can't make new districts to address it; SCOTUS effectively put them in a paradox where their underrepresentation is discriminatory but so is giving them a new district to fix it.
>>
>>1510831
SCOTUS takes precedence over the federal court. they aren't two separate issues. the federal courts ruled that and now its been effectively overturned even though its a separate lawsuit its still addressing the same issue.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>1510838
>how do you not understand common sense, it literally is overruling their win in the federal courts.
It literally is not; per the ruling itself, Louisiana still has to draw up new maps. They just can't use THESE new maps.
>>
>>1510839
new maps that conform to the Supreme court's ruling.
gotta love how leftists are supporting racism, if ur born black and only black your vote should be worth 3x.
If you're white asian italian hispanic you're worth less then a regular vote
why because black on white and trans are the new democrat battlegrounds to justify violence against the opposition.
>>
>>1510840
>new maps that conform to the Supreme court's ruling.
Which is paradoxical; there needs to be new maps because the black population are underrepresented. But the maps that actually give two districts to the black population are illegal; so what exactly are they supposed to do?
>>
>>1510841
nothing is paradoxical its just outright saying you can't pack the districts in your favor. how is that hard to understand.
they should be grateful they even had 1 given they aren't a majority in any of the districts.
>>
>>1510843
>they should be grateful they even had 1 given they aren't a majority in any of the districts.
Anon you literally do not even know what the fuck you're talking about at this point. Louisiana literally has a 33% black population. That isn't spread across the state evenly, they have communities. Those communities were the ones who successfully sued for this redistributing in the first place.
>>
>>
>>
>>1510845
>and do any of those communitys occupy more then 50% in a district,
They all got shoved into one. That is literally the problem that they SUCCESSFULLY sued over.
You're literally calling the people who proved in court the districts were unfairly set up to ensure they didn't have proper representation the racists.
>>
>>
>>1510542
>The state has a 33% black population yet only 1 district out of 6 has a majority black population.
The entire state of California has one (1) Republican district despite almost half the population voting for the Reps, Massachusetts has zero (0) Republican districts despite almost half the population voting for the Reps.
It's not ok just because your side is doing it.
Good for the goose, good for the gander.
>>
>>
>>1510850
>The entire state of California has one (1) Republican district despite almost half the population voting for the Reps, Massachusetts has zero (0) Republican districts despite almost half the population voting for the Reps.
There's a difference between party and racial blocks you idiot.
>>
>>1510849
>and now its been overruled by a higher court sue me.
The same "higher court" created 60 years ago what they're overrulling now. It was fine until The Federalist Society packed the court full of ultraconservatives in the last 10 years.
>>
>>1510735
>>Using race as basis for pulling you over and arresting you: Ok
>>Using race as basis for travel bans: Ok
When did the Supreme Court make these rulings?
A Travel Ban which includes Cuba, Iran and North Korea isn't racist against Hispanics, Arabs and Asians. It's a travel ban against the axis of evil
>>
>>
>>1510798
>Just get rid of the only productive and civilized members of society anywhere in the world so that everywhere can be brownlandia and there won't be anywhere for browns to flock to in order to make better wages because it'll be slave conditions everywhere on Earth
Okay. It won't save them from the fact that its not geography or circumstance creating civilization, its whites. No whites, no civilization.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>1510870
>universal humanism
lmao the literal origins of the term "universal humanism" is from a movement in Chile. Egalitarianist philosophy is present in both Islam and Buddhism. The earliest known hospital was found in Sri Lanka. You know nothing of history other than an incredibly basic and childish view of "uh we whites da bestest!"
>>
>>1510872
>what's happening to the UK and France.
Better than what's happening here where what white and Christian supremacists have gotten us is a fucking economic suicide that looks to be threatening the petrodollar that serves as half the reason the US is the world power it is.
>>
>>1510868
>its white rightists. No white rightists, yes civilization
ftfy
>>1510872
>a jeet PM elected & placed into that position by only a mainly white selection committee that's part of the Conservative Party replaced by a white PM actually democratically elected in a general election on 5th July 2024 in UK
French elect a white president
And he'll never see what's happening in those countries, because doing so would prove his opinions wrong.
>>
>>
>>1510870
>are white culture
White culture isn't just "all the good things ever" lmao. What is "white" culture? Is it European? How about more specifics: British? French? Spanish? Russian?
Or is it just "whatever I think is good even if it comes from completely separate cultures and origins with the only shared trait being how much melanin they have"?
>>
>>
>>1510879
>Maja R.’s sentence was harsher than the rapist she defamed because she had a previous conviction for theft and had not attended the court hearing for the case.
Yeah maybe actually show up to the fucking hearing. I'll admit Germany's defamation laws are extreme but she absolutely could've gotten off if she didn't let the fucking trial default.
Now, you wanna comment on how they let these rapists off without prison for being young, I'm curious: how do you feel about Robert Morris getting a mere 6 months for repeatedly raping a 12 year old? Or Adam Hoffman only getting 60 days without even having to register as a sex offender despite the fact he molested a 6 year old boy for over 4 years? Oh, oh, or how about Jesse Butler, who had the exact same "oh but he's too young to send to prison!" scenario as your article because he raped 2 girls before he turned 18 and faces no jail time or sex offender registry and will literally have his entire criminal record expunged within the year?
You highlight these cases of examples of how "the EU has fallen", yet it seems the exact same thing is happening here in the US and you don't give a single shit.
>>
>>1510880
>What is "white" culture?
Equality under law is a pretty good example.
Liberalism was born from the french revolution, which gave way to Locke and Hobbes, then its precepts were used to create a modified version of English Common Law. Free speech, the right to firearm ownership, free association etc were all Colonial english cultural values.
BLM calling the criminal justice system systemically racist was ironically accurate. It's a system designed by white people, for white people, to protect a society of white people, and it catches non-whites because it wasn't built for them.
Culture runs downstream of race. Rapes spiked in England because they brought in people who think the age of consent is a suggestion and women are property, but liberals are forced to ignore this because it would shatter their utopian vision of society.
Conservatives are no better. They are deathly scared of being racist, because they are diehard racial egalitarians, while simultaneously defending a country that banned miscegenation. And then you look at the leadership and it's filled with jews who are just advocating for their own race to the exclusion of all others.
>>
>>
>>1510868
>its whites. No whites, no civilization
>>1510878
>a jeet PM elected & placed into that position by only a mainly white selection committee that's part of the Conservative Party
Wait till >>1510868 learns who now leads the Conservative Party: and due to a process of voting for such organized by the same mainly white selection committee that's part of the Conservative Party that ensured that a jeet led them, certainly the government that was in power, until 5th July 2024.
>its whites
>whites allowed a jeet to be PM of a mainly white country
White rightists never had the right to have any political power whatsoever. Case in point, Reform UK, led by Trump's pal Nigel Farage. A candidate in the municipal elections in UK on May 7th
https://wwwthenational.scot/news/26045880.reform-uk-candidate-found-ca lled-nazis-real-visionaries/
'(Ben) Rowe 'described immigrants to the UK as “breeding like rats” and labelled Islam “a cancer”'
(PROTIP: Candidates have to be vetted & selected to run in elections by the party said canidates represent in elections)
That particular Reform UK candidate?Salman Anwar
>>
>>1510883
>And then you look at the leadership and it's filled with jews who are just advocating for their own race to the exclusion of all others.
Oh yeah, forgot to mention: a lot of the shit going on in the west makes more sense once you realize that certain demographics defacto would not be tolerated if egalitarianism didn't exist, so they shill it as hard as they can as a moral virtue to let the rest of the world have an ethnic enclave in the US.
Meanwhile Tim Walz is flying a not-Somali flag in his office and everybody has to pretend like this is a totally normal thing the founding father's would've tolerated, otherwise you're labeled as hitler (and specifically hitler) coming to bring another holocaust.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>1510886
>Meanwhile Tim Walz is flying a not-Somali flag in his office
Yes, because you fascist freaks just invaded our city to go after Somalians for bullshit crimes they didn't actually do.
>otherwise you're labeled as hitler (and specifically hitler) coming to bring another holocaust.
No, you're labeled as nazis because you keep doing nazi shit. Like the camps, and the warmongering, and the racism.
>>
>>1510891
>bullshit crimes they didn't actually do
Wow I guess stopping fraud is racism huh
Is fraud intrinsic to race? Guess so.
>No, you're labeled as nazis because you keep doing nazi shit
Hitler is the bogeyman of communists and jews, not Somalis.
>>
>so you have a humiliation fetish and a foot fetish? the internet really fucked you up didn't it shill
>n-n-no u!
>so you have a humiliation fetish
But enough about >>1510890, considering how its been comprehensively owned in other threads: as the projecting >>1510887 & >>1510890 prove.
I don't need to behave the way >>1510887 & >>1510890 does in /news - and why should I? - so what's your excuse for being immature, projecting shill?
>>
>>
>>1510894
>Wow I guess stopping fraud is racism huh
No, racism is racism. When I say we need to fight the fucking insane levels of fraud infesting this entire administration, I'm not saying that because they're white.
>Is fraud intrinsic to race?
That is LITERALLY the argument you faggots are making. We need to crack down on Somalians, because (some) Somalians are (allegedly) doing fraud, therefore all Somalians are fraudsters.
>Hitler is the bogeyman of communists and jews, not Somalis.
And communists and jews are the boogeymen of nazis.Wow, look at that, even more nazi shit!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>1510898
TLDR because not all somalians are commiting fraud we should turn a blind eye and pretend none of them are
also because some politicians are commiting fraud on the party i'm opposing we hsould pretend they all are.
also ignore the fact that democrats are increasingly anti isreal and anti-jewish and literally making up conspiracy levels shit
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>1510925
>>1510926
>>1510927
I'm a high-T, goodlooking white chad with a six figure job, the kind of person you brownoids wish they were.
your low rent indian shills who don't have to buy salt because they're constantly crying into their microwaved food
don't hate me, hate the world that you wreen't born succcessful and white
>>
>>
>>1510883
>Rapes spiked in England because they brought in people who think the age of consent is a suggestion and women are property
Crime rates are tracked by country of origin and the rape rates of recent immigrants are more or less the same as native British subjects when adjusted for age and sex of the perpetrator.
Attributing a higher rate of sexual violence from recent immigrants to their race is nonsense, and attributing the overall increase in reported rapes to immigration is equally nonsense. The data doesn't support the shit you're saying.
All it shows is that reported rapes have been increasing overall and young men rape more than old men or women.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>1510930
>Attributing a higher rate of sexual violence from recent immigrants to their race is nonsense
I didn't say recent. This is a race issue.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derby_child_sex_abuse_ring
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halifax_child_sex_abuse_ring
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotherham_child_sexual_exploitation_scan dal
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huddersfield_grooming_gang
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newcastle_sex_abuse_ring
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxford_child_sex_abuse_ring
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rochdale_child_sex_abuse_ring
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>1510950
This idea that certain races are more prone to this kind of criminal behaviour has been debunked by statistical analysis. Actually “White British” are statistically more likely to be nonces involved in grooming gangs than “Pakistani British”.
It was 85% of the population are white and are attributed to 87% of the grooming gangs whereas 5% are Pakis and only attributable to 4% of the grooming gangs.
You should look it up because I’m only going off memory. Owen Jones yt channel had a full explanation
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>1510960
He has at least one video on yt where he goes through all the statistics I just mentioned. He’s actually a journalist and does fact checking and both of those quotes you’ve bothered to write there are true, rape is rape there’s nothing ethnic about it and most rapists in the UK are white
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>1510966
>both of those quotes you’ve bothered to write there are true
No. He's a shill that's trying to deflect blame.
You can't say that race doesn't matter in statistics until white people are involved. That's retarded.
>>
>>
>>
>>1510983
You can’t say rape is an ethnic issue, it’s rape. Saying rape is somehow tied to ethnicity is incredibly stupid and makes no sense. Saying most rapists (in the UK) are white is factually correct but only because most people in the UK are white and rape is done by people and saying most rape is done by the people of the majority race proves that rape itself isn’t an ethnic proposition.
That guy is clearly retarded
>>
>>1510988
>Saying rape is somehow tied to ethnicity is incredibly stupid and makes no sense
The Arab and Pakistani gangs in Britain specifically target white girls, and it was being done because the perps viewed them as having less cultural and legal support. This was proven in court and the grooming gang inquiry.
>>
>>1510950
Why does Reform UK have as a candidate in the municipal elections on May 7thSalman Anwar? Either they're getting rather sloppy when it comes to vetting & selecting their candidates or the fact that Reform UK's senior MP Nigel Farage is friends with an orangepedowhich in itself says so much about that white leader of a party that's supposed to represent the interests of white Britons.
>>
>>1510998
>perps viewed them as having less cultural and legal support
because its not a race issue, but its a power dynamic and opportunity issue. its because we willingly let rapists (Trump) get away with it despite overwhelming evidence and court rulings
the entire problem is caused by conservatives letting rich white rapists (Trump) get away with rape
>>
>>
>>
>>1511009
no, really. celebrities have a bigger impact on society than everyone else. people name their babies after celebrity babies, get celebrity haircuts, they do what celebrities do
thats why celebrity rape is rapier than regular rape, and needs to be punished harder
>>
>>
>>
>>1510441
MAGA knows they're going to lose the midterms, so they're doing shit like this to make it so they don't. They've said so themselves. This is them attempting to set up minority rule in this country; the majority of the population wants them gone, but via disenfranchisement, gerrymandering, and all that shit, they'll still stay in power anyway.
This is a coup. Not with rioters or guns, but with laws. This, right now, is MAGA overturning democracy.
>>1510771
This country was founded on killing people like you. God willing, it will be so again.
>>
>>
>>1511094
>ethnic groups do not
Yeah, sure, which is why there won't be a massive reduction in Black majority districts following this decision.
Republicans won't be giving white people more districts. It's just a coincidence. Shut up, bitch.
>inb4 you claim you're just undoing a racism by taking shit away from the ethnic group that got shit unfairly
Reverse racism is still racism.
Actually, wait, this is white people taking shit from Black people, so that would be racism is still racism.
>>
>>
>>
>>1510998
They weren’t going to target girls from their own community because they’d obviously get caught almost immediately. It’s that saying don’t shit where you eat. It’s why burglars don’t usually break into their next door neighbours house, and why serial killers don’t usually murder their own family. Even if they were targeting the white girls for the reason stated it’s not because of their ethnicity it’s because there’s a lack of support for them, they are a kind of forgotten class, similar to Jack the Ripper targeting prostitutes. It wasn’t all white girls are targets either, they are all from a particular socioeconomic background, they weren’t kidnapping girls from the All Girls Public Day School for Posh Girls
>>
>>
>>1510450
This. The south will rise again. The left started this. We didn't want this just like we didn't want the war of northern aggression but they did this. They bought the bull and now they get the horn. The dems are getting everything they deserve.
>>
>>
>>1511106
>it’s not because of their ethnicity
Culture is part of ethnicity, and these people literally believe white women deserve to be raped.
If you're a leftoid and a western feminist then you're absolutely retarded.
>>
>>
>>1511134
First of all learn to read. They weren’t targeting white girls because they are white, they were targeting girls that don’t they perceived as having less cultural and legal support to better enable them to get away with what they were doing.
As I already fucking explained in the previous post they were not going after girls from a middle-class background. And it shouldn’t even have to be said that them being white girls was coincidental, they would’ve targeted any kind of girls that they thought they’d get away with targeting based on those girls not having any solid support structures.
It also shouldn’t need to be explained that culture isn’t the same thing as ethnicity or race, you can be of a certain culture and that culture can contain several or even a multitude of ethnicities.
If you don’t know what words actually mean go look them up, dictionaries are free now you’ve no excuse
>>
>>
>>1511092
actually the country was founded on executing traitors like you.
Democrats are mad they lost the election they're advocating terrorism real original.
The vast majority of the population wants YOU gone thats why the majority of people who cared enough to vote voted for trump
but go ahead and use your pathetic buh buh its technicaly not a majority because 40% of voters don't vote
I'm going to enjoy seeing you be the next alex pratti you'd deserve it god willing you get ran over before you hurt someone else
>>
>>1511149
ok going by that logic you're all domestic terrorists and deserve to be thrown into a furnace then since you have antifa terrorists destroying public property and being a menace to society.
some are therefore all of you are terrorists, see it wasn't so hard, now please kindly wait to be butchered and made into minced meat
>>
>>1511143
>They weren’t targeting white girls because they are white
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rochdale_child_sex_abuse_ring
>In a BBC documentary investigating grooming young girls for sex by some Pakistani men, Imam Irfan Chishti from the Rochdale Council of Mosques deplored the practice, saying it was "very shocking to see fellow British Muslims brought to court for this kind of horrific offence."[57][58] Mohammed Shafiq, chief executive of the Ramadhan Foundation, accused elders of the Pakistani community of "burying their heads in the sand" on the matter of sexual grooming. He said that of convictions involving child sexual exploitation, 87% were of British Pakistani men and it was a significant problem for that community. He said the actions of criminals who thought "white teenage girls are worthless and can be abused" were "bringing shame on our community."
>>
>>
>>1511180
You’re retarded. They were not targeting white girls for being white, they were targeting girls from their locale who they knew didn’t have a solid support structure and they happened to be white. It was not racially motivated, the fact they were white was coincidental.
Also the 87% you’ve posted here is for the Rochdale ring, not for the whole UK. You seriously need to get your head around all this stuff because what you’re doing by trying to make it about race when it isn’t is distracting from what we all want which is no pedos, but by focusing only on the brown pedos you’re letting all the other ones get away with it and wasting everyone’s time with this bullshit. I’m really trying to explain this stuff properly, the vulnerable girls are the ones that don’t have strong family supports and whose parents don’t give a shit about where they are and what they’re doing for whatever reason. The grooming gangs occur when enough pedos get together and enough of them have some ways of being alone with or accessing the vulnerable children. It’s a very serious threat to society and by hijacking it into more race bait for a dead political agenda all you’re doing is effectively making it easier for certain groups of pedos to continue operating. It’s as if you’re only upset if the pedos themselves are white men, it’s disgusting
>>
>>
>>
Are white girls being targeted by men in India & Pakistan? Certainly considering the ratio of females of a certain race relative to the men in the subcontinent & UK.Little white girls targeted by that which is orange, so there's that. Those worse than 'traitors' - those who support/worship an orange rapist/pedo - will disagree: but by doing so, they admit to being pedo enablers themselves or would disavow & condemn said orange subhuman. I disavow/condemn rapists/pedos of all races, and their supporters. Reform UK's Nigel Farage - who has candidates from the subcontinent in the municipal elections on 7th May - is a friend of Trump: and refuses to disavow/condemn that orange rapist/pedo
>>
>>
You can start with an orange rapist/pedo >>1511336, if you think there's no moral objection to the removal of any & all rapists/pedos. Disavow/condemn that orange pedo. Go ahead. Say it.
I disavow/condemn an orange rapist/pedo. There. I've said it. Your turn.
I disavow/condemn all rapists/pedos and want their removal, regardless of race. Rapists/pedos - white, orange or any other color - don't have the right to live in America. I've said it. It's extremely easy to do so. Now you say 'I disavow/condemn an orange rapist/pedo and want that orange rapist/pedo removed from America'.
Go ahead. The only one stopping you: is you.
If your reply is anything other than 'I disavow/condemn an orange rapist/pedo and want that orange rapist/pedo removed from America', then you have no morals. Indeed: you condone & support an orange rapist/pedo. You'll be admitting you do if your next reply is anything other than 'I disavow/condemn an orange rapist/pedo and want that orange rapist/pedo removed from America' verbatim. And only that.
>>
>>1511098
>>Americans get political districts, ethnic groups do not.
>Yeah, sure, which is why there won't be a massive reduction in Black majority districts following this decision.
Probably but it's not because they're Black, it's because they overwhelmingly vote Dem.
Gerrymandering districts (which BOTH parties do) is all about getting more votes for your party, regardless of who is voting for your party.
Again, the ENTIRE STATE OF CALIFORNIA has only one (1) Rep district despite roughly half the people of California voting for the Reps.
>>
>>
>>1511353
>Probably but it's not because they're Black, it's because they overwhelmingly vote Dem.
>It's just a coincidence Republicans disenfranchise Black voters. They don't hate Black people. They just hate Dems. It's just almost all Black people are Dems.
So, to be clear, Republicans hate Black people and are trying to disenfranchise them?
>>
>>
>>1511358
To be clear, everyone should hate black people and be trying to disenfranchise them, its part of looking after the basic health and lawfare of your nation. If they were fit to be treated as humans instead of farm equipment, Africa would be a civilized continent.
>>
>what the superior Tuskegee Airmen did to three so-called 'Master Race' pilots of supposedly 'superior' technology that were actually inferior Messerschmitt Me-262s with just piston-engined North American P-51 Mustangs with red tails over Berlin in one day in March 1945
To be clear, everyone should hate white rightards and disenfanchising them, it's part of looking after the basic health and lawfare of your nation. If white rightards were fit to be treated as humans instead of wastes of inferior DNA, North America would be a civilized continent.
>>
>>
>>
>Trump is losing the Hispanic vote
https://kansasreflector.com/2026/03/24/the-ever%E2%80%91evolving-latin o-vote-is-rapidly-shifting-away-fro m-trump-and-republicans/
>a projecting MAGAtard' has no logic
>just cry 'Racism' because nobody likes white rightards that deserve discrimination & disenfranchisement for the crime of having wrong opinions, the crime of supporting an orange pedo, and the crime of existing, and write the mental fanfic of 'being victorious'
t. Republicans