“Our employment practices are merit-based and focused on recruiting and promoting the best talent in the world,” Rhoades Ha added.

“No one is above the law — including ‘elite’ institutions,” said EEOC Chair Lucas in a statement. “There is no such thing as ‘reverse discrimination’; all race or sex discrimination is equally unlawful, according to long-established civil rights principles. The E.E.O.C. is prepared to root out discrimination anywhere it may rear its head.”

The New York Times is the latest target in the Trump administration’s anti-DEI push. In February, the EEOC issued a subpoena investigating Nike’s diversity policies, claiming they’re discriminating against white workers, months after Lucas, the EEOC’s Trump-appointed chair, launched an investigation into the diversity, equity, and inclusion practices of 20 major law firms. Similarly, in December 2025, Lucas posted a PSA on X, encouraging white males who have “experienced discrimination at work based on your race or sex” to file claims “to recover money under federal civil rights laws.”

Ultimately, the lawsuit asks the court to issue an injunction barring the Times from “discriminating against employees because of race or sex,” along with back pay for the complainant. Rhodes Ha says the publication plans to vigorously defend itself against these claims.

“The New York Times categorically rejects the politically motivated allegations brought by the Trump administration’s E.E.O.C.,” she noted.

However, the implications of this case go far beyond one editor and one job posting. If this lawsuit succeeds, it doesn’t just chill diversity hiring at the Times, but also sends a message to every newsroom in the country about what happens when you try.

>>1513406
>“The allegation centers on a single personnel decision for one of over 100 deputy positions across the newsroom, yet the E.E.O.C.’s filing makes sweeping claims that ignore the facts to fit a predetermined narrative,” said Danielle Rhoades Ha, a spokeswoman for The Times. “Neither race nor gender played a role in this decision — we hired the most qualified candidate, and she is an excellent editor.”
She's literally correct btw. This lawsuit is about one guy not getting a promotion, then trying to work backwards to claim their HIRING practices show they discriminated against him getting said promotion. Even though, you know, they did actually fucking hire him.

>>1513406
>poor persecuted white people
lol

>>1513406
You see these retarded OP’s and you know it’s some idiot posting ideological bullshit

>>1513410
>promotion
did he get the promotion though?
>>1513413
>I hate White males and think they should be discriminated against
thank God bigots like you lost the election so we can have a president who opposes racism and sexism.
>>1513426
>You see these based OP's and you know it's some noble egalitarian posting anti-racist anti-sexist news

>>1513457
Not all white males are racist chudcels like you are who deserve every bit of discrimination you get.

>>1513463
do you believe that people should be denied a promotion just because of their race and gender?

>>1513465
No. Do you believe a woman of color cannot possibly be better at a job than a white man?

>>1513463
>Not all of X are racist chudcels
>Proceeds to be a racist chudcel outspokenly in support of marginalizing X

You're going to get the rope one day and we're all going to laugh.

>>1513470
That isn’t what he said.

>>1513472
It is. Being anti-white still makes you a racist and judging someone's fitness for rights or cancellation based on race still makes you a chud, whether you're liberal or conservative.

He is a racist who is openly and unabashedly anti-white. Simple as.

>>1513467
>No.
welcome to the club, fellow Chudcel! Thank you for joining us in the fight against bigots like >>1513463 who believe that companies should discriminate against White men

>>1513478
nobody will ever take your larp seriously esl shill. get a real job and stop pretending to be white on a dead board

>>1513406
Trump has been flogging government lawyers to file all sorts of bullshit lawsuits. We've seen plenty of stories on this board about lawyers literally breaking down defending Trumps bullshit.

>>1513480
>asks a question
>gets an answer
>is asked a question
>won’t answer
As expected, concession accepted.

>>1513478
>It is.
No, it’s not.

>>1513457
>did he get the promotion though?
How do you prove he wasn't simply worse than the person who did when all you have as evidence is saying they don't hire white people... even though they hired him.

>>1513488
This is like asking how bad slavery really was if there was at least one slave that got to live in the house.

>>1513493
That’s not even close.

>>1513493
Not even remotely comparable lmao. It's a pretty simple manner of
>I didn't get promotion because I was white!
>Ok what proof of this do you have
>Well look at all these hiring practices that show they're anti-white!
>Ok but what about the actual circumstances of your promotion?
>uh...uh...

>>1513497
The thing is, mediocre white chuds actually are being excluded as a group because of DEI.

Whites only employment policies have to exclude a lot of top tier candidates for purity reasons, so as you keep going down the list they have to fill a lot of roles with underqualified white chuds

Every qualified DEI hire pushes out a mediocre white chud.

They're being genocided, and I love it

>>1513497
All racial discrimination is universally bad across the board anon.
If you think otherwise then you're giving up the game entirely and there's no reason to pretend otherwise.

>>1513499
god you're esl

>>1513499
You cannot simply pretend that racism and discrimination don't exist.

>>1513505
Literally the opposite of what I said, but go off queen.

>>1513513
I know what you said, and you know what I mean.

>>1513514
>you know what I mean
It sounds like you're pushing tolerance for certain types of racism.
Which, okay, fine. We can do that if you really want.

>>1513515
Yes, yes, I know the bit. Feigning ignorance doesn't make a difference. DEI, and other attempts to address existing racism, are not racist.

>>1513499
>All racial discrimination is universally bad across the board anon.
And a white man demanding he be given a promotion just because he's white isn't?

This guy has literally offered zero evidence his lack of promotion was in any way related to them wanting more minority hires.

>>1513488
>>1513497
NYT said they wanted to discriminate against Whites. Then a White male was denied a promotion. Maybe it's a coincidence. Maybe the other person really was more qualified. But if Fox News said that they would discriminate against Black women and then denied a promotion to a Black woman, I'll bet you would assume she was discriminated against.

>>1513643
>NYT said they wanted to discriminate against Whites.
They did not.

>>1513478
It's okay to be anti-white rightard because according to >>1513623 , hypocrisy isn't wrong.
Be as bigoted to & persecute white rightards as much as you like, liberals! Because if rightards can't take it, they never had the right to dish it out in the first place.

>>1513645
>they didn't say they want to discriminate against Whites, they just said they planned to drastically increase the number of non-Whites
nobody falls for this

>>1513659
>>1513661
Your reverse uno card rascism is pathetic. This wild push by white supremacists across the country to claim any attempt to balance power away from the massive control that white peoples have is actually racist to whites… shut the fuck up. You have had all the power for all of existence. I know you hate seeing skin that doesn’t match your own. But your genetics are inferior. Your skin is inferior. Your brain is inferior. Your culture is inferior. Die alone while the rest of the world keeps fucking till we are all a mixed race hue.

>>1513665
If we swapped the races in your post, you'd sound like a white supremacist. From assigning moral and biological traits based on race, to the idea that all white people are collectively responsible for every historical power structure - that's literally white supremacist rhetoric with the labels swapped.

Ironically, the political right is far more responsible for hurting marginalized people, including white people who are poor, queer, disabled, immigrants, or otherwise outside the "correct" mold. Those people are routinely exploited, disenfranchised, and scapegoated by the exact systems you're supposedly railing against.

You're basically a right-wing strawman brought to life. Your rhetoric is politically self-destructive. There are natural allies sitting all around you, but instead of building solidarity you're preaching racial essentialism like a grand fucking dragon.

Younger white voters see rhetoric like this and conclude - correctly - that you're judging people by skin color while pretending it's morally enlightened because it's aimed at the "right" targets. Then they drift toward reactionary politics because at least those movements openly admit they're playing identity politics.

If you genuinely want to affect change, shut the fuck up. You're moving in the exact opposite direction.

>>1513666
ok but this guy's evidence for why he didn't get promoted basically boils down to "They want to hire more minorities, therefore that's why I didn't get promoted".

>>1513669
So this guy's a retard, don't turn around and become a nazi about it.

>>1513673
Just pointing that out. You can make arguments about anti-white discrimination all day but when it comes down to this specific lawsuit, the evidence this guy wasn't promoted solely because of race doesn't really add up. Hell the NYT's response indicates he didn't even have the proper experience required for the position.

>>1513665
>hypocrisy is fine!
>b-b-but you can't be a hypocrite against me!!
White rightards deserve perecution & bigotry against them for the crime of being rightards, and for the crime of existing.
If they can't take it, they don't have the right to dish it out. And your wrong opinions are even more reason why white rightards only deserve persecution & bigotry.
>I know you hate seeing skin that doesn’t match your own
I'm white - unlike the non-American that is you, shill - thus it's fine to persecute & be bigoted against white rightards.
>But your genetics are inferior
I'm not the shill that infected /news/ whose genetics resulted in the single brain cell that makes it behave the way it does in /news/. I don't behave the way you do here, so what's your excuse?
>Your skin is inferior
>Your brain is inferior
Says that which can only project
>Your culture is inferior
Says that which avoids toilets.
>Die alone while the rest of the world keeps fucking till we are all a mixed race hue
Says the projecting non-American that will die alone, and will never be a white American. And probably isn't even in America as it posts its wrong opinions that only deserve to go into the trash. And is the insecure >>1513655 that continues to prove it is by merely continuing to exist in /news/ because its supposedly 'superior mindset - or it wouldn't need to be here if it wasn't insecure - is proven to be inferior.
Because that's what projecting shills such as you are, >>1513665 : inferior.

>>1513674
Of course it doesn't
Mediocre white chuds are getting pushed out of society by smart and qualified nonwhites, and it'll keep happening and we'll keep hearing mediocre white chuds complain about it

>>1513669
He's right though. In any reasonable distribution of employment, every job should be at least 70% white Americans, because the country is 70% white Americans, but the racist policies that many corporations follow require there to be at least 50% minorities, which means they're being given disproportionate representation based on racist lines.

>>1513677
>White rightards deserve persecution and bigotry
And there it is. Racism and bigotry is okay as long as its against the people you don't like. You may find this difficult to believe, but you're exactly like the people you hate, verbatim. The only difference is that you picked a different skin color to be racist about.

>>1513679
you're literally not white or american

>>1513682
That doesn't have anything to do with what I said, total non-sequitur. Even assuming that you're entirely correct, everything I said still stands objectively on its own regardless of the place where I'm posting or the ethnicity I'm posting with. Get new material, faggot.

>>1513683
it has everything to do with all your posts, esl shill. nobody takes you seriously and you're our little lolcow

>>1513406
its the paper that supports hasan's view of robbing grocery chains because fuck the rich even though he's a millionaire nepobaby

>>1513677
It's great knowing that I don't even have to say a word because white supremacy will continue to grow because retarded jeets like you radicalize more people than anyone on the right ever could. We're already starting to see openly racist candidates running and winning. You should be lucky that you're allowed to live in a country with white people at all

>>1513687
how did you end up hating yourself this much

>>1513687
not racist enough they should platform on cannibalism. white meat for holiday occasions, brown black for everything else, asians off limits

>>1513677
I hope you learn one day that racism by black people against white people is just as bad as racism by white people against black people
One does not justify the other

>>1513702
>I hope you learn one day that racism by black people against white people is just as bad as racism by white people against black people
Call me when we have systemic killings of white people that are then excused by a majority black government.

>>1513687
>white supremacy will continue to grow
lmao isn't your whole thing that the white race is dying?

>We're already starting to see openly racist candidates running and winning.
lol even Trump has to backtrack and hide his racism because being openly racist loses you elections and funding. Your candidates survive entirely off plausible deniability and one slur gets them kicked off the ballot.

>>1513709
Take a trip to South Africa.

Or the UK.

>>1513665
>if you oppose racism then you're actually racist
lol
>I support racism which is good and makes me anti-racist because supporting racism is anti-racist
lmao
>>1513669
>ok but this guy's evidence for why he didn't get promoted basically boils down to "They said they wanted to discriminate against White people and they promoted a non-White woman instead of me, therefore I was discriminated against
it's not conclusive but it's definitely enough for a lawsuit. Let NYT prove why their policy of discriminating against White people (which they publicly stated they wanted to do) didn't apply to this specific case.

>>1513756
>their policy of discriminating against White people (which they publicly stated they wanted to do)
where did they say that and what did they say?

>>1513758
https://thehill.com/changing-america/respect/diversity-inclusion/540379-new-york-times-admits-its-a-difficult-place-to/

>In response to the review, the Times committed to increase the percentage of Black and Latino employees in leadership roles by 50 percent by 2025 and will create a new diversity office in its human resources department. Diversity and inclusion will also be factored into employee assessment and compensation beginning next year.

During the peaceful protests where Black people and leftists peacefully killed people because they wanted Black criminals to murder cops, Black NYT employees complained that NYT wasn't racist enough so NYT agreed to be more racist.

>>1513766
>it's racist to want more black and latino employees

>>1513766
The word white or caucasian isn't used in that article at all. Where did they say they'll discriminate against white people?

>>1513766
That doesn't say they want to discriminate against White people.
>During the peaceful protests where Black people and leftists peacefully killed people because they wanted Black criminals to murder cops, Black NYT employees complained that NYT wasn't racist enough so NYT agreed to be more racist.
Meanwhile you say shit like this and then expect anyone to take you seriously.

>>1513767
>>1513771
>>1513775
>they said they want more non-White employees that doesn't mean they want fewer White employees
https://i.imgur.com/aFCfuoS.jpeg

>>1513777
>>they said they want more non-White employees that doesn't mean they want fewer White employees
Yes anon. You cannot force them to keep hiring white employees even when they want non-white hires.

>>1513777
>>they said they want more non-White employees that doesn't mean they want fewer White employees
Does saying I want to eat more strawberries mean I want to eat less blueberries?

>>1513778
>Yes anon. You cannot force them to keep hiring people on merit even when they want to hire people based on skin color
actually we can. Democrats lost that fight, racial discrimination is illegal.
>>1513779
>Democrats still don't understand per capita
Saying you want a higher percentage of your diet to be made up of non-blueberries means that you want a lower percentage of your diet to be made up of blueberries. See https://i.imgur.com/aFCfuoS.jpeg

>>1513782
Forcing someone to hire white employees is racial discrimination.

>>1513782
did they say they would fire white people or stop hiring white people?
> Saying you want a higher percentage of your diet to be made up of non-blueberries means that you want a lower percentage of your diet to be made up of blueberries.
Hiring a single black person lowers the percentage of white people at a company. Does that mean they can’t hire any non-white person at all?

>>1513709
>a majority black government
>the reply:
>UK
Which has a majority white government.
Yep, >>1513709, the projecting lolcow shill which came up with that retarded answer is a foreigner that knows nothing about other countries.

>>1513709
Which government currently excuses systemic killings of Black people? I remember the Biden administration supporting the attempted murder of Kyle Rittenhouse because he was White though
>majority black
why does it matter if White Democrats hate themselves so much that they actually want to be murdered for being White?

>>1513783
>Hiring non-white employees just because they are non-white is racial discrimination
yes
>>1513784
>Hiring a single Black person specifically because they are Black because you publicly said you don't want to hire White people
that's racist and illegal
>inb4 they said they wanted to hire Black people that doesn't mean they don't want to hire White people
see https://i.imgur.com/aFCfuoS.jpec

>>1513789
>The Tulsa Race Massacre doesn't count because that's all in the paaaaaast
>Also white democrats don't count as white

>>1513790
>>Hiring a single Black person specifically because they are Black because you publicly said you don't want to hire White people
So, where did they say they don't want to hire white people?

>>1513789
>I remember the Biden administration supporting the attempted murder of Kyle Rittenhouse because he was White though
Source?

>>1513709
Call me when we have systemic killings of white people that are then excused by a majority black government
>the post immediately after >>1513786
QED.
Why does it matter to that which is not only probably not living in America, but isn't white: said projecting foreign lolcow shill that knows nothing about other countries.

>>1513792
>Also white democrats don't count as white
literally the opposite of what I said you White Zoomer. See https://i.imgur.com/aFCfuoS.jpeg
>>1513793
>they didn't say they didn't want to hire white people they just said they wanted to hire non-white people instead of white people
https://i.imgur.com/aFCfuoS.jpeg
>>1513795
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/harris-rittenhouse-verdict-shows-there-is-a-lot-more-work-to-do-on-criminal-justice-equity

>>1513800
god your life is humiliating

>>1513800
>literally the opposite of what I said you White Zoomer
Why you being racist to whites all of a sudden?

>>1513800
>>they didn't say they didn't want to hire white people they just said they wanted to hire non-white people instead of white people
Where did they say "instead of white people"? How do you know it was instead of white peopel rather than in addition to white people?
>https://i.imgur.com/aFCfuoS.jpeg
Counterpoint: You worship a retarded orange chomo who likes to rape kids.

>>1513800
>https://www.foxnews.com/politics/harris-rittenhouse-verdict-shows-there-is-a-lot-more-work-to-do-on-criminal-justice-equity
That doesn't say they want him dead. It's just people commenting on a trial.

>>1513790
Misquoting means you can't refute what was actually said.

>>1513805
>Where did they say "instead of white people"? How do you know it was instead of white peopel rather than in addition to white people?
Your generation doesn't know how percentages work because your teachers are woke
>>1513806
>Democrats saying that he should have let himself be murdered doesn't mean they wanted him to let himself be murdered
>>1513807
>I hate all White men

>>1513709
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killing_of_Austin_Metcalf
>its fine he was probably bullied
>it was self-defense
>he was made to do it
>he deserves to kill because racism.
I hope you die

>>1513709
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Chicago_torture_incident
this should've been YOU

>>1513826
>LOL I used buzzwords that makes me one of you XD!!!
if you were an adult you would cringe

>>1513803
>the foreign shill that continues to exist in /news/
It keeps being humiliated in /news/ - and every single time it posts in threads which it abandons when it knows its wrong opinions are proven to be more than wrong by others - because the projecting foreign lolcow shill is insecure. Thus it continues being the lolcow of /news/. It would know how to avoid being constantly humilated if it didn't want to be the resident lolcow here. Or it has a humiliation fetish.

>>1513709
>>1513824
Does frisco texas have a majority black government?

>>1513803
That between >>1513825 and >>1513828 projects by using a word that is a staple of those who aren't adults. Itself using a buzzword. And continues to project. It indeed has a humiliation fetish, demonstrated by its need to post in /news/, then when it is further humiliated by others it abandons threads it infects. Which has happened every single time it does. Thus it is indeed the lolcow of /news/. It knows how it can avoid being said lolcow, but it has that humiliation fetish.

>>1513819
Concession accepted.

>>1513819
>Your generation doesn't know how percentages work because your teachers are woke
Ok explain it then. how are percentages relevant here?
And can you answer the previous question. How are they "hiring black people instead of white people" rather than "hiring black people in addition to white people"?
Was it bad that previously white only companies started hiring black people after segregation ended in places like the USA or south africa? That decreased the percent of white people at the company.

>>1513829
america has a huge chunk of black supramacists and apologists like you. so you should die

>>1513834
>How are they "hiring black people instead of white people" when they say that they want the PERCENTAGE of black people to increase and the PERCENTAGE of white people to decrease
I can't explain how percentages work to a zoomer
>>1513832
see https://i.imgur.com/aFCfuoS.jpeg

>>1513839
>https://i.imgur.com/aFCfuoS.jpeg
Projection.

>>1513839
Can you answer this question:
>Was it bad that previously white only companies started hiring black people after segregation ended in places like the USA or south africa? That decreased the percent of white people at the company.

>>1513850
>Was it bad that companies which previously discriminated based on race stopped discriminating based on race?
no. Now can you answer this:
>Is it bad that the NYT currently discriminates based on race?

>>1513858
So how is that case different?

>>1513858
>>Is it bad that the NYT currently discriminates based on race?
How is it different? You just acknowledged the previous "whites only" policy was discriminatory.

>>1513879
>>1513863
>You just acknowledged that discrimination 100 years ago was bad
>So why do you think that discrimination is still bad?

>>1513880
>It's ok to start hiring black people to make up for how you only hired white people
>But not too many

>>1513882
>It's okay to not discriminate
>But it's not okay to discriminate

>>1513883
>Noooo you have to hire more whites!
Please keep explaining how wanting to keep up the white ratio is somehow not discriminatory.

>>1513880
Why can't you answer the question. How is the NYTime case different?

They just said they are hiring more non-white people because they are underrepresented in the nytimes. Just like what happened elsewhere after jim crow ended.

>>1513885
>Noooo you have to hire the most qualified people regardless of their race!
Yes. Doing otherwise is discriminatory.
>>1513887
>How is discriminating based on race different from not discriminating based on race?
This isn't a serious question, you're trolling.

>>1513890
can you believe you wasted another day larping as a white american? did you get anything out of it

asian women are obsessed with white men

>>1513890
>Doing otherwise is discriminatory.
You know until suddenly "oh looks like all the most qualified people are white. What a coincidence!"

Companies, especially media ones, are allowed to want more diversity in the opinions and perspectives of their ranks.

>>1513890
What makes it discrimination when the nytimes does it, but not after Jim Crow ended?

>>1513909
Yeah, that's what it supposed to look like you colossal faggot. Because whites actually are the best and hiring minorities is a direct expression of racism and discrimination. Why else would you want them if not to discriminate against the best? Would you not otherwise just hire the best?

>and hiring minorities is a direct expression of racism and discrimination
Thanks for admitting that Trump is racist for hiring Krash Patel the drunkard as head of the Feds, >>1514041

>>1513914
>What makes it discrimination when the NYTimes discriminates, but not when other people stop discriminating?
lol
>>1513909
>NYT
>diversity in the opinions and perspectives
LMAO
>Companies are allowed to racially discriminate
maybe in your country, but not in America

>>1514065
Yeah try not to have too much of a tantrum when this lawsuit crashes and burns.

>>1514065
>>What makes it discrimination when the NYTimes discriminates, but not when other people stop discriminating?
>lol
You aren't answering the question. You are just claiming the NYTimes situation is "different" and somehow magically discrimination, without providing evidence for it.

What's the key difference that makes one discrimination but the other not?

>>1513406
Is anyone seriously believing that the new york times isnt discriminating against white men?

>>1513406
that bitch needs white cock so much its insane.

>>1514086
No, anons like this >>1514078 >>1514077 know NYT is racist and sexist, but those anons are also racist and sexist

>that bitch needs white cock so much its insane
And that's just the faggot brown shill in /news/ that constantly projects

>>1514094
You have shown zero evidence of discrimination from them.

You simply said hiring more black people is racist now but it wasn’t racist in I
Other cases. But you didn’t explain what the difference is between the cases.

>>1514161
https://i.imgur.com/aFCfuoS.jpeg

>>1514202
i accept your concession that the nytimes is not racist.

>>1514202
That's just a https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thought-terminating_cliché

You're getting angry because a double standard in your reasoning has been pointed out. So you're resorting to spamming the same meme over and over because you aren't smart enough to think about what you are saying.

You need to operate under the delusion that
>"liberals are pretending not to understand things, making discourse impossible"
because you are an imbecile who is incapable of explaining or even understanding your own beliefs.

You're willing to put in a lot of effort into typing your posts, but you can't actually answer a single question properly. Instead you just mock them and act like they are bad questions. If you were capable of explaining the difference, you'd have answered it by now. Instead you have evaded the question when asked 5 different times. If there is a difference between the two scenarios, you are a retard who incapable of noticing it and explaining it.

>>1513790
>>Hiring a single Black person specifically because they are Black because you publicly said you don't want to hire White people
>that's racist and illegal
Except they are still hiring white people and haven't fired all the white people at the new york times. So your assumption is clearly bullshit.

>>1514211
>>1514219
It's already been proven that NYT stated that they intended to discriminate against White people though. Thanks for admitting you're illiterate and proving the point in >>1514202

>>1514219
Good post. More effort than he deserves, though.

>>1513806
>that doesn't say they want him dead
>It's just the Vice President saying that Rittenhouse deserved to be murdered
Leftists will say shit like this and then pretend you aren't violent terrorists.
>>1513805
>>1513793
>that doesn't say they want to hire a smaller percentage of White people
>it just says they want to hire a bigger percentage of non-White people
Leftists will say shit like this and then pretend you aren't racists who don't understand math.

>>1514229
Yeah again; what is the difference between doing so now and doing so when Jim Crow ended?

>>1514223
>It's already been proven that NYT stated that they intended to discriminate against White people though.
No, they didn't say that. They said they were going to hire more black and latino people.
Yes, I know you're going to respond with this:
>>1514229
>>that doesn't say they want to hire a smaller percentage of White people
>>it just says they want to hire a bigger percentage of non-White people
But you still haven't answered the question. Why was it ok that companies wanted to hire a smaller percentage of white people when jim crow ended?

>>1514238
>>1514245
>doing so
what are they doing? What specific example from Jim Crow are you using? Are you even 18? Are you American? Do you know what Jim Crow was?

>>1514211
"I accept your concession" is something an insecure beta bitch would say.

>>1514247
heres an example, 1964 civil rights act made it illegal to discriminate based on race in job hiring.

>>1513684
>our
Who are you with? Hush fag.

>>1514297
Correct, which is why the NYT is now being sued because they are illegally discriminating based on race in job hiring. Thank you for proving us right.