>>2866235
its basically the same as stolen valor

>show of character
if you think the clothes you wear are a 'show of character' you are the biggest fucking mark around

Wearing camo has been a bullshit way to signal you're a faggot who knows nothing about agriculture, farming, or sustainable country living while simultaneously signaling your desire to be seen as 'country aka NOT A CITY BOY' for over 10 years now

next you're going to tell me driving a lifted truck didn't make you a badass country boy?

>>2866248
Don't respond to drive-by phone posters.

>>2866251
jebaited

>>2866251
idiot. why did you write this block of text if you read my sentence? you agree! also, I didn't read anything you said.

>>2866294
Too bad, I didn't read anything you said besides the first sentence of the first post

It’s because “they” are trying to coop the last vestiges of white culture and diversify it so you have no where to run. It’s why beyonce has a country album and old navy has a line of camo clothing. Your culture will be appropriated, marketed, watered down, assimilated and eventually destroyed and there is nothing you can or will do about it.

File: IMG_5982.jpg (3.6 MB)

3.6 MB JPG

>>2866235
Silly sweaty, it’s 2026, if you want hunter street cred you realtree your guns

>>2866251
>over 10 years now
Wearing camo as daily wear has been the provenance of townies with no jobs, crust punks, hipsters, and the performatively country since the the Vietnam War. And before the 80s, hunters just wore brown and all the camo was milsurp.

People in realtree when not actively hunting are only not in these categories when they’re too poor to have a second jacket, using your hunting clothes as daily wear is bad for scent control and also the longevity of what were reasonably expensive garments (compared to solid color clothes). This has been the case since before Jim Crumley started selling Treebark.