File: sony-a7iii-shutter-failure-guide-me-info-and-questions-in-v0-g4qsm7z07gyc1.jpg (1 MB)

1 MB JPG

A7iii

File: canon-r6-shutter.jpg (1.2 MB)

1.2 MB JPG

>>4501605
For me, it's EOS R series.

>>4501602
kodak has more frames but the fuji has the better flash switch and looks better

>>4501605
>>4501607
>film thread
>open
>Inbreed brandfags fighting

>>4501816
Canoniggers win again and BTFO the Snoy. Stay mad.

File: Scan-140423-0007.jpg (877.5 KB)

877.5 KB JPG

>>4501602
If you want a shitty film camera with "character" just get a 30's late model Kodak Brownie 2 (one NOT made of cardboard!) or any other working lowest end 120 camera. Mine was £2 + postage and looked and smelled like it had spent last 80 years in cold attic. While finder mirrors are corroded and lens bit fuzzy it works fine. The single meniscus lens is surprisingly sharp for what it is.

File: 52440020.jpg (3.6 MB)

3.6 MB JPG

>>4501602
I've had a lot of fun with the Kodak waterproof disposable.

File: 08560028.png (4.9 MB)

4.9 MB PNG

>>4501999
Agfa's waterproof disposable is quite nice as well.

>>4501602
get a reusable disposable like the ilford sprite

>>4501837
I actually picked up a cardboard one for 4 euros, cleaned the lenses and glued the mirrors back in place. Fun to use but the cardboard was bending inwards making it near impossible to open and it wasn't very happy with the 120 film spool either.
I still need to develop the film but I got a better box camera for 10 euros in the meantime, one that actually works well with 120 film, a Zeiss Ikon one.
Will probably get some developer tomorrow and get those negatives ready.

File: Untitled.jpg (371.2 KB)

371.2 KB JPG

>>4504195
With Brownies and other really low end 6x9cm 120 cameras think contact prints (or perhaps a phone screen). A 32" desktop screen does not give justice to the photos.

the funsaver is legit the best disposable
but the fuji one is a close 2nd.

both cost too much though.