Thread #16916464
File: Boeing's_Starliner_crew_ship_approaches_the_space_station_(iss067e066735)_(cropped).jpg (2.1 MB)
2.1 MB JPG
Piece of dogshit - edition
previous >>16913749
755 RepliesView Thread
>>
>>
>>
File: HBi9oHjWgAAmGkX.jpg (154.6 KB)
154.6 KB JPG
https://x.com/SpaceflightNow/status/2024576713858912566
>Here's Boeing's statement regarding the Starliner Crew Flight Test report discussed today:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1744003711887848.png (3.1 MB)
3.1 MB PNG
>SpaceX can land its rockets in The Bahamas again — and will do so very soon
>A Falcon 9 first stage will land on a drone ship in Exuma Sound during the Starlink Group 10-36 mission, which will launch 29 of the broadband satellites to low Earth orbit from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station.
>Liftoff is currently scheduled for Thursday (Feb. 19), during a four-hour window that opens at 5 p.m. EST (2200 GMT).
https://www.space.com/space-exploration/launches-spacecraft/spacex-res ume-rocket-landings-bahamas-after-s tarship-mishap-debris
>>
File: 1761572554443773.png (409.5 KB)
409.5 KB PNG
fucks going on?
https://nitter.net/Acyn/status/2024576497676407294#m
>>
>>
File: 1755006794891274.jpg (380.8 KB)
380.8 KB JPG
>Disagreement over crew return options deteriorated into unprofessional conduct while the crew remained on-orbit
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16916487
>NASA Human Factors interviews
>66 NASA and Boeing employees, NASAHFACS framework
>The Starliner mission delays and uncrewed return were caused by a mix of technical issues as well as human and organizational factors. Most NASA interviewees agreed that returning the crew on Dragon was ultimately the right decision while many Boeing employees disagreed, downplaying the technical risks. These differing risk perspectives persist today. Addressing organizational issues- such as expectations, assumptions, and requirements- offers a critical path forward to preventing future human and organizational factors from exacerbating performance problems and improving overall mission safety.
>5.2.3 Leadership
>Boeing mission leadership just wants to undoock, risks be damned, because that's what they did when they worked Shuttle
>"People said, ‘Why bother? He’s driving in one direction and that’s what he wants.’"
>Strong personalities within CCP and Boeing were seen as overly optimistic in presenting data, which some interviewees interpreted as lobbying rather than objective analysis.
>"If you weren’t aligned with the desired outcome, your input was filtered out or dismissed."
>"I heard them berate the safety engineers off muted mics."
>"It’s not an environment that is inviting to dissenting opinions."
>Following the mission, many interviewees perceived a lack of accountability among senior leaders, noting a greater emphasis on managing public perception instead of acknowledging and addressing the mission’s significant failures. Rather than demonstrating ownership of the issues, leaders were perceived as deflecting responsibility, which undermined trust within the workforce and among key stakeholders.
>>
>>16916487
Though also
>“NASA wasn't blaming Boeing, but everybody else was. […] You know, it's our program. We're responsible too. Nobody said that. And nobody within NASA [or outside of NASA] has been held accountable. Nobody. We're 11 months after it happened, and there's been no accountability at all, from any organization.”
>STAR team (general CCP investigation) General findings (excerpt)
>Resources and skills were not adequate during key design activities prior to contract award
>The rigor in resolving issues identified by NASA during design reviews was less than expected.
>At the beginning of CCtCap, the focus was on SpaceX human spaceflight design maturity, with a preconceived notion that Boeing was more experienced in human spaceflight.
>NASA was unwilling to enforce the contract terms on Boeing due to prior cost and schedule over-runs and the potential consequence of enforcement.
>Shared Accountability Model did not operate as planned. The burden was on NASA to prove it was unsafe.
>Qualification tests had shortcomings.
>Lack of spare hardware available impacted ability to conduct testing when technical/performance questions arose.
>Unrealistic launch dates influenced Boeing design and build decision making.
>>
>>
File: 2026-02-19-000996.png (2.1 MB)
2.1 MB PNG
>>
File: 2026-02-19-000997.png (2.6 MB)
2.6 MB PNG
>>
>>
File: 2026-02-19-000998.png (1.9 MB)
1.9 MB PNG
>>
>>
File: 1752962680182862.png (2.1 MB)
2.1 MB PNG
nasa ninjas dont look as cool as the spacex ones
>>
File: 2026-02-19-000999.png (2.4 MB)
2.4 MB PNG
>>
>>16916497
>>16916505
these things arent going to be finished until the end of the year at this rate
>>
File: 2026-02-19-001000.png (1.9 MB)
1.9 MB PNG
>>16916500
https://youtu.be/Pr8dwTk8d40?si=IYtuv7nYH_UBbEeN&t=300
>>
>>
>>
File: 2026-02-19-001001.png (17.3 KB)
17.3 KB PNG
https://x.com/SciGuySpace/status/2024573085597225109
>>
>>
>>
File: Starliner announcement2.png (1.6 MB)
1.6 MB PNG
Starliner will never fly again.
>>
>>
>>16916522
I know you’re just joking but it’s worth reiterating that this is entirely boeing’s fault and they purposefully hid data from NASA to save face and try to keep up the facade of prestige and nearly killed two astronauts, and seem to have no remorse for doing any of this
>>
File: boeing.jpg (64.2 KB)
64.2 KB JPG
>>16916521
>>
>>
>>16916525
Oh is that so? That’s not what the documents say.
>it’s just a joke
When you’re trying to gargle on daddy Trump and Lonny it’s easy to dismiss anyone pointing out their failings as just humorous jokesters I guess
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16916525
it seems like a great deal of fault lies with NASA ignoring the apparently obvious signs that Starliner was having an incredibly troubled development and green lit a crewed launch without closing out several issues with the craft. claiming this is entirely Boeings fault just reeks of Challenger levels of horseshit
>>
File: 4010718.jpg (84.6 KB)
84.6 KB JPG
Starship parts washing up in a Tambohorano commune in Madagascar. From the rough translation it suggests 3 months are being given for it to be retrieved or it will become their property.
There's a facebook link, but I can't add it to this post because it's being considered as spam
>>
>>16916567
You can get the link from this post
https://x.com/mcrs987/status/2024596978282197428
>>
>>16916480
We're in slow-motion disclosure.
Spielberg's been part of the public opinion management on aliens for decades, and he has a movie coming out in June that's just a palatable mush of half-truths to prime the masses for info coming out over the next 10-ish years.
The real kicker is that they're not "aliens," just humans from previous interglacial periods.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16916582
VERY. Those engineers pictured at the scene are already replicating our technology at a rate much faster than China, by an order of magnitude. The race to the moon and Mars is lost to Madagascar. It's over.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16916487
This made Type A when Skylab didn't
I'm starting to think they weren't telling us everything about the thruster failure during dock
It sounds like the astronauts saved themselves and the ISS from complete catastrophe and should be getting fucking medals
>>
>>
>>16916606
Isaacman was pretty clear in the presser that if it wasn't for Butch and Suni and the flight controllers on console using all their savvy and breaking standard flight rules to bring back the thrusters they probably wouldn't have made it.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 2026-02-20-001004.png (219.1 KB)
219.1 KB PNG
https://x.com/SERobinsonJr/status/2024617161130725396
>>
>>
File: HBjiiwoXQAANVvQ.jpg (215.5 KB)
215.5 KB JPG
>>
>>
>>16916487
Due to the loss of the spacecraft’s maneuverability as the crew approached the space station and the associated financial damages incurred, NASA has classified the test flight as a Type A mishap. While there were no injuries and the mission regained control prior to docking, this highest-level classification designation recognizes there was potential for a significant mishap.
>>
File: 1743562177759.jpg (65.2 KB)
65.2 KB JPG
>>16916628
The Pristine Snow Ball versus the Filthy Rotten Orange.
>>
>>
>>
>>16916470
a new thing to add to the list:
>SpaceX has entered the bidding for a $100 million competition to create voice-controlled, AI-enabled drone swarms.
in other words, SpaceX is joining the military industrial complex.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 2026-02-20-001005.png (429.8 KB)
429.8 KB PNG
https://x.com/SawyerMerritt/status/2024610072706355444
https://techcrunch.com/2026/02/19/spacexs-starbase-city-is-getting-its -own-court/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16916651
>>16916646
>It's too hot you'll never get the Iron.
TURN ON THE AC IN YOUR EXCAVATOR! If you stood exposed on the surface of Mars or Venus you would die. If you can pump pressurized air into the mining rig on Mars you can pump cold air into the one on Venus. Nobody can explain why it's diffrent.
>>
>>
>>
A source recently told Ars that two NASA astronauts, Woody Hoburg and Jessica Wittner, have begun training for a potential “Starliner-2” mission that could take flight during the first half of next year, should the uncrewed test flight in 2026 go well.
"Hoburg Memorial Middle School"
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1767735405305.jpg (108.2 KB)
108.2 KB JPG
>>16916659
Most of the metals tested in the study I took this graph from retained more than 80% of their strength at the surface temperatures of Venus. Copper, bronze, and stainless steel aren't typically made structurally integral materials anyway. A material 80% as strong as structural steel can't be used to build anything?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16916657
Well if it's not just a bribe or money laundering disguised as graft, I'd say it's because SpaceX has access to an entire network of orbital satellites which can be used to maintain communications with and transmit nav data from drone swarms, and Tesla does not.
Sounds like they might think fiber optic tethers is a meme, because they want to move away from individual meat operators towards literally skynet.
>>
>>
>>
>>16916698
>>16916694
Man kind made it quite far without modern computers computers. Vostok-1, the Rocket that made the first man commit space flight, had an entirely mechanical clockwork computer.
This is, of course, ignoring man kinds long-standing ability to build buildings where it is one temperature on the inside but a different temperature on the outside.
>>
File: Screenshot 2026-02-19 195540.png (706.6 KB)
706.6 KB PNG
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16916716
https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/nasa-report-with-redac tions-021926.pdf
>>
File: Screenshot from 2026-02-19 21-01-54.png (123.9 KB)
123.9 KB PNG
Is it possible?
Will Orion actually complete a crewed mission this year?
And before Starliner?
>>
>>16916711
No that's wrong. We maintain large heated rooms at thousands of degrees surronded by an atmosphere that is less than the 100°C. Why would we be unable to do the opposite? Why is it possible to insulate a hot room from a relatively cold planet but not a cold room from a hot planet.
Are you a material scientist do you know something I don't about insulators?
>>
>>
File: but_bigger.jpg (53.5 KB)
53.5 KB JPG
>>16916659
>There is no way to fix that with existing technologies.
>>
>>
>>16916720
Heat only flows from hot to cold. The process for getting around that involves adding more heat to the system which also needs to be rejected, and must be hotter than the environment it's being rejected into. Making a hot box is trivial. Making a cold box is not.
>>
File: 1768508171927297.jpg (342.6 KB)
342.6 KB JPG
>>16916718
>If you weren’t aligned with the desired outcome, your input was filtered out or dismissed
>>
>>16916720
you can insulate the hot room from the outside colder area somewhat, but it will still lose heat, but that can be fixed by heating it up a bit
in the opposite case you would have to refrigerate the cold room as heat would slowly seep in but the problem here are the temperature differences
it should be possible in principle, but it would require massive amounts of power and you would have to create that power somewhere outside the cold room because otherwise it would just heat it up
perhaps you could have some kind of power plant that works in thousands of degrees of ambient temperature but idk, basically everything melts, so you would probably have to bring power through a wire from the colder upper atmosphere where you could have a power plant
probably not impossible but what you suggest is not something that has been done ever
>>
>>
File: 2026-02-20-001007.png (38.5 KB)
38.5 KB PNG
>>16916727
>>16916720
https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5LWNvcHk_4eccee8e-ad7e-4609-9b59-080cb02 2c2ab
>>
>>
>>16916725
I am well aware that heating is easier than cooling. The question was if thermal insulators work the same for cold box in hot land and hot box in cold land, which I'm 99% certain they do. Then it's easy to just bring more cold air to the cold box, Venus has two surfaces, at the other surface (the type Sol, Juipiter, and Saturn have) it's only a little hotter than Earth is.
>>16916727
Why not bring new air to the insulated container? Don't tell me large-scale air circulation has never been done because humans make CO2 from oxygen it would be needed on Mars, too.
Also, nuclear reactors work this way, cooling by bringing new cold water and "throwing out" "used" hot water. Water is less fluid than either Earth or Venus atmosphere.
>>
>>16916731
>This is essentially a nuclear-powered, actively cooled Venus habitat module—doable on paper with today's materials, just very heavy and expensive. Concepts like this appear in NASA Venus lander/power papers (e.g., Stirling duplex systems). Scaling up or optimizing insulation/COP would make it more practical. If you specify a different room size or power source preference, I can refine the numbers!
>>
>>
>>16916736
The wonderful thing about having a real atmosphere (yes I'm well aware Mars technically has one) is passive flight, the upside to having an atmospheric pressure of 93 bar is flight becomes trivial.
The cold air comes from the "boats" where everything but raw resources come from.
>>
File: 281c6e918165e2dd.jpg (36.6 KB)
36.6 KB JPG
>>16916740
>>
>>
>>
File: Noel_Sickles_Crash_of_the_USS_Macon.png (1.7 MB)
1.7 MB PNG
>>16916747
oh, you mean lighter than air. I figured you meant gliders which is also retarded.
you know there's a reason we've all but abandoned lighter than air flight.
>>
>>16916747
Grok, is she right?
No way! Hot air balloons, specifically solar-heated Montgolfieres, are a promising, low-cost technology for Martian exploration, allowing for long-distance aerial imaging, atmospheric measurements, and sampling of diverse terrains. Due to the thin atmosphere, they must be large, lightweight, and utilize sun-heated air for buoyancy, often requiring specialized, robust deployment systems.
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1747630913584355.gif (319.1 KB)
319.1 KB GIF
wouldn't be funny if something malfunctioned and the thing went ahead an launched?
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1765017701305.jpg (65.1 KB)
65.1 KB JPG
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16916688
I feel ya
>>16916691
8 days is plenty enough to hurt
>>
>>
>>16916786
It's not much cold required... but what am I talking about balloons can't lower and lift things, balloons on Mars are about the height of balloon to mass lifted. If Balloons aren't practical for lifting a 3,000 cubic foot box on Mars it litteraly can't be done.
>>
>>
>>16916811
You definitely could make it work somehow. Maybe good insulation, and a balloon filled with phase change material that will evaporate after a while and lift the prob back into the temperate zone to cool off
>>
>>
>>16916805
What makes you think you're not enslaved right now, little mon-keigh?
>>
>>16916819
Aced it, which is why the thread is so quiet right now.
https://www.nasa.gov/blogs/missions/2026/02/19/nasa-begins-artemis-ii- launch-pad-ops-after-successful-fue l-test/
>>
>>
File: SN11 landing.webm (2.7 MB)
2.7 MB WEBM
>>16916830
Tradition
>>
>>
>>
>>16916818
Mining outposts inevitably require logistics, if we are talking full scale colonies that exist to do more than just mine. Be it boats, trains or even trucks, it's just impossible that all the resources you want and need are going to be all clumped together. Under your colony. Just constant Balloon convoys taking cooled air down and resources back up.
>>
>>16916837
Masses of ice would be a better coolant than air. Thick insulation, and a chunk of ice slowly melting. Then before it melts away, your balloon activates to lift you back into the upper atmosphere. This could all become routine.
>>
>>
>>
https://x.com/nypost/status/2024692232100467020
Exoplanet scientist murdered
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: Troposphere V.webm (2 MB)
2 MB WEBM
>>16916588
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16916882
MANY SUCH CASES
SAD!
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/05/06/us/university-of-pittsburgh-profess or-killed
>>
>>
>>
File: 1766760977437201.jpg (293.9 KB)
293.9 KB JPG
Ground clutter starting to be implemented in KSA
>>
File: 1761030702866660.png (2.3 MB)
2.3 MB PNG
>>16916914
And IVA demo...
>>
>>
>>
File: trump aliens debunked 2026-02-20 21-43-35.png (301.5 KB)
301.5 KB PNG
Show's over, folks.
There are no aliens, and we're never leaving this solar system.
>>
>>16916994
The only reason I'm not dismissing this outright is the apparent existence of exotic propulsion systems that would make the ongoing development of conventional aircraft and ships completely pointless if we had them, and our budget is not infinite enough just to build conventional systems for a masquerade. This still leaves a lot of difficult questions, like "of all the hellholes of the galaxy, why would they choose to come here without trying to make themselves known?"
>>
>>16917006
Sentient life might be quite rare. They might find us very interesting for that reason.
Also, our access to nuclear weapons depended on the Shinkolobwe mine in the Congo. Without that, the Manhattan Project might never have gotten off the ground. It's a very unusual deposit, and it could be almost unique in the galaxy in combination with a native sentient race.
>>
File: yrliet with braids.png (1.1 MB)
1.1 MB PNG
Xenogfs for all true american patriots
>>
>>
File: its_time_to_deliver.png (290.5 KB)
290.5 KB PNG
>>16916660
So, assuming all goes well from now on (lmao), Boeing will have to do 5 test flights of this shitbucket before operational missions.
>>
File: Screenshot 2026-02-20 034715.png (131.1 KB)
131.1 KB PNG
>>16916994
why are you posting some literal who
>>
>>
File: 1765199197982718.jpg (378.4 KB)
378.4 KB JPG
KSA terrain lined up with an Apollo landing site.
>>
File: 1766597675845.jpg (215.7 KB)
215.7 KB JPG
>>16917026
I don't know why he posted this random guy, probably politics, but this random guy is right. FTL isn't real. Trump is either doing a distraction play or negotiating with terrorists who will never be satisfied with the truth.
>>
>>16917067
I think the jury is still out. I think FTL propulsion has been ruled out. Even if you did have a MacGuffin, you’d fly into a fucking rock or rogue planet or space peanut. Before even thinking about radiation. Might very well be some exotic stuff that allows you to go from A-B instantly. Let’s give it 50 more years before we close the book on that.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: FE8MNajVQAQlJDf.jpg (390.7 KB)
390.7 KB JPG
spehs?
>>
File: AS11-44-6642HR.jpg (709.3 KB)
709.3 KB JPG
>>16917115
spehs
>>
>>16916631
>>16916634
I'm wish Starbase would eventually be closed to the public. If they want to launch multiple ships a week from the site, they can't have it swamped with tourists. Have a tour bus bring in paying people instead.
>>
File: 1724605210677507.jpg (382.9 KB)
382.9 KB JPG
>>16916914
>>16916915
I hope KSA is multi-thread optimized. I want to see threadrippers running that shit.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16917130
They would not have built / are building so many employee residences there if they intended to evacuate all the time.
Its a R&D site for now, but sure, they do intend to scale this site to mass launches. By then they want the safety factor to have the evacuation boundary at the limit of the residentially built environment, the edge of the build site and town. Fuck this needing to evacuate 5 miles, its excessive. South Padre isn't leaving for any launch, so the village of Starbase can stay occupied too. Only the beach is closed with launch activity
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16917186
>muh evolution
You’ve empirically observed speciation occurring? You’ve watched an animal turn from one species to another? That’s amazing. That’d be the first time it was ever observed/recorded. You know, as is typically required when you do scientific studies and experiments on phenomena, you first observe and record it. You should write a paper given your singular and unique experiences, though it might hurt in terms of validity if you can’t find anyone else who isn’t also able to empirically observe species turning into new species.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>muh accretion
You’ve empirically observed a protoplanetary disk turn into a planetary system? You’ve watched rocks turn from rubble to celestial bodies? That’s amazing. That’d be the first time it was ever observed/recorded. You know, as is typically required when you do scientific studies and experiments on phenomena, you first observe and record it. You should write a paper given your singular and unique experiences, though it might hurt in terms of validity if you can’t find anyone else who isn’t also able to empirically observe planetesimals turning into new planets.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: HBjtbfCagAAumC8.jpg (782.9 KB)
782.9 KB JPG
https://x.com/RGVaerialphotos/status/2024629096471548025
>>
File: Solar_system_mass_distribution_ppm_chart.svg.png (658.3 KB)
658.3 KB PNG
>>
File: HBjtbfDbYAAAZtb.jpg (954.4 KB)
954.4 KB JPG
>>
Is the vacuum of Space supposed to be the depths and the firmament the atmosphere? What are the pillars?
Why did God include a passage in his word that would be wrongly interpreted for centuries after it was written?
>>
>>16917201
Everybody knows there is a lot of quantitative evidence in the half-life estimation of terrestrial zircon crystals to suggest that the planets are way older than simple mathematical creation estimations, unless half-lives behaved way different than they do know like 2,000 years ago but it’s obvious this is unlikely
>>
File: HBjtbfHbQAAUM4I.jpg (807.4 KB)
807.4 KB JPG
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16917210
The bible’s purpose isn’t to offer scientific truths, why are you using it as such? It’s salvation poetry and genealogy and foreshadowing and ultimately the good news of Jesus. Who, by the way, made the planets and space billions of years ago (for humans to control one day)
>>16917217
Why would He go out of his way to deceive me, that is stupid. To suggest God lies or deceives is incorrect.
>>
File: Wic-cover-2.jpg (58.7 KB)
58.7 KB JPG
VELIKOVSKY WAS RIGGHTTTT
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16917203
>denies science is real
Science relies on empirical observation and recording of phenomena which is then tested and experimented
Phenomena which are never empirically observed/recorded and are instead just insisted as being obvious fact based off of a narrative when they can’t in fact be observed/recorded are definitionally non-empirical and thus non scientific. If you believe otherwise you are free to point to what should be a wide swathe of empirically observed and recorded examples of species becoming other species via macroevolutionary change. If you cannot do this you automatically concede. No book is magic and animals are not “magic” either.
>>
File: Tychonian_system.svg-3.png (316.5 KB)
316.5 KB PNG
for me, it's the Tychonic system
>>
>>
>>
File: Trofim_Lysenko_portrait.jpg (564 KB)
564 KB JPG
>>16917233
preach it brother, after all /sfg/ is a Lysenkoism/Lamarckism general.
we've all been lied to
>>
>>16917237
Yup, that’s what happens when your internal sense of logic/truth (imago dei) conflicts with the narrative you’ve been indoctrinated to accept when the two conflict (ie you know what defines one concept you hold dear, yet you accept a complete obliteration of that definition when another concept you’ve been really trained to swallow whole requires it). Fascinating. Now this is an observation on the nature of human behavior.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16917241
this seems like very sophisticated projection
you seriously think the only way to deduce that evolution makes sense is to directly observe speciation empirically?
almost nothing in science is really based on direct empirical observation
many things are not observable directly even in principle by humans (such as subatomic particles transforming into other particles)
>>
if someone doesn't know about Na+/H+ antiporters they have absolutely zero fucking authority to hand wave about evolution and be a smug retard.
It's basically the equivalent of a flerfer not even knowing about any Apollo missions besides 11.
lol
>>
File: pathways.png (1.7 MB)
1.7 MB PNG
>no starship flights has reduced /sfg/ to talking about biology with a YEC
ohoogogogohohhohoho
>>
>>
Oof. Looks like somebody struck a nerve. Overweight nerds get really upset when you point out that their interpretation of a bunch of old bones in mud getting put together to resemble giant dragon chickens is retarded, and that having that presented to them as fact when they were small children has just given them an emotional attachment to the idea.
Imagine you do this with ghosts.
>Ghosts are hecking real you fucking chud okay!?
>okay, where are they? Can you observe them?
>i-it’s happened plenty! Like this haunted house where someone said the door moved on its own!
>okay, a ghost is one way to interpret how that observation may have occurred. Couldn’t it feasibly have been something else though?
>no there’s like hecking teams with electric ghost detection technology!
>Many of those are proven hoaxes and frauds, you know
>REEE ACCEPT THE SCIENCE
Suddenly you replace ghost with dinosaur lizard and tiktaalik growing fish legs and a cock so he could fuck on land 400 gorillion years ago when no one would ever be able to actually see or know it and every smug “intellectual” of 110 IQ loses their minds. Really interesting social discourse at play there.
>>
>>
>>16917253
you know, I really don't think you even know what evolution *is*.
I think your retarded YEC parents turned you into a retarded YEC and as a result your brain didn't bother registering what you were (hopefully) taught in 10th grade bio.
>>
File: Pygmaclypeatus.png (678.8 KB)
678.8 KB PNG
Pygmaclypeatus is cute <3
>>
>>
>>16917257
Indeed. Being as all things were created through the Logos (logic), all of creation is interrelated and a personal reflection on some level of the creator, and indeed humans being made in His image have the same form of rational logic and order which allows them an intuitive understanding of this order and logic which created them and all the things surrounding them. A truly beautiful tapestry. I’d imagine at least some high tier people on here subscribe to Russian cosmism given the subject matter.
>>
>>
>>
File: Nautilus_belauensis_from_Palau.jpg (1.7 MB)
1.7 MB JPG
there are only two Nautiloid genera left :(
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 4047.jpg (47.1 KB)
47.1 KB JPG
>>16917203
Explain this titwad
>>
>>
File: GGKLx.jpg (95.5 KB)
95.5 KB JPG
>>16917281
>opens article
lel
>>
>>
File: 1761076581863659.jpg (179.9 KB)
179.9 KB JPG
>wake up
>check sfg
>tons of posts
>oh something good must've happened
>its all schizo posting
we need more launches
>>
>>
File: HBlVjvwbUAEuR8O.png (89.1 KB)
89.1 KB PNG
>https://x.com/coastal8049/status/2024746387301343534?s=20
>In January @russianforces
pointed out odd behaviour from the Russian ELS/TUNDRA satellite early warning system. The co-ordinated westward drift in apogee longitude appears to have ended in a co-ordinated manner.
What are the Russians up to? Also why when I look at the semi major of these satellites it seems to naturally increase and then maneuver to go down?
>>
File: WTF.png (65.5 KB)
65.5 KB PNG
>>16917290
>>
>>
Ever hear the tale of the Tortoise and the Hare? SpaceX is the hare, quick, active, but easily distracted by Mars and Al. Blue Origin is the tortoise, slow but methodical, dead set on the main goal, The Moon. @JeffBezos clearly implies here that they will beat SpaceX to The Moon.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16917192
This has actually been observed twice. You just won't look it up because you don't really want to know because you're afraid it will conflict with your religious beliefs. Once you really start to understand you will know that science deals with the material universe and religion deals with the immaterial. There is no conflict to be had
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1768465420496839.png (253.2 KB)
253.2 KB PNG
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: really.jpg (264.6 KB)
264.6 KB JPG
>>16917426
>V2 changed Spacex
>>
>>
>>
File: 1742229744243300.png (1.4 MB)
1.4 MB PNG
oh... so she got a boob job...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 2026-02-21-001010.png (17.7 KB)
17.7 KB PNG
https://x.com/CSI_Starbase/status/2024950505051742334
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: average sfg poster.jpg (138.8 KB)
138.8 KB JPG
>>16917452
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1657771859620.png (616 KB)
616 KB PNG
>>16917505
and me too
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>Tory Bruno says he joined Blue Origin to work on ‘urgent’ national security projects
>Bruno, former CEO of United Launch Alliance, said he decided to join Blue Origin to work on important national security projects
>He noted that his portfolio at Blue Origin includes Blue Ring, a highly maneuverable spacecraft bus. The company is offering Blue Ring for both civil and national security applications, including a mission scheduled for launch later this year supported by a Defense Innovation Unit contract.
>“It has an enormous amount of delta-v,” Bruno said, referring to change in velocity. “Once it has arrived at its destination orbit, it can maneuver away from that orbit, above it, below it.”
>“I’m going to put artificial intelligence on the spacecraft so it has a high degree of autonomy as well when it’s on orbit,” he said, adding that Blue Ring ground control centers will also incorporate AI to help operators address spacecraft anomalies or threats.
>>
>>
File: 2026-02-21-001011.png (2.5 MB)
2.5 MB PNG
https://x.com/FelixSchlang/status/2025096444038836305
>>
>>
File: you-saved-our-lives.jpg (76.5 KB)
76.5 KB JPG
>>16917662
i know, wretched isn't it
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1742641263799035.jpg (83.3 KB)
83.3 KB JPG
Give it to me straight, are those Artemis II astronauts going to burn up on reentry? The heat shield STILL hasn't been tested with the planned reentry trajectory.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16917677
I wouldn't be surprised either way
they have a lot of experience with catching the boosters now, but I guess the aerodynamics of the new booster, v3s etc have not been integration tested even if they could test and make relatively sure that the tower works
>>
>>
>>
File: 1765070501448347.jpg (106.9 KB)
106.9 KB JPG
>>16917695
?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16917698
>>16917700
Also, if disposable heat shields are such a solved problem with big margins, then why didn't the Artemis 1 heat shield perform the way their computer models said it would?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16917704
this guy >>16917689
I was being imprecise with my quoting because I'm a lazy nigger.
>>
>>
>>16917708
If I act excited for this then I'll be obliged to be excited when China lands men on the moon before America manages to get back. So you see, it is my misplaced sense of national pride which prevents me from being excited about my country doing a thing.
>>
>>
>>
File: IMG_0159.jpg (206.9 KB)
206.9 KB JPG
Holy kino this emblem goes crazy
>>
>>
>>
>>16917682
The heatshield may not be great by modern-day stadards (i.e. Dragon)
see
>>16917696
But it held up well enough to ensure a safe and very much survivable reentry.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1753372649978318.jpg (151.1 KB)
151.1 KB JPG
SLS is kill
>NASA Troubleshooting Artemis II Rocket Upper Stage Issue, Preparing to Roll Back
>NASA is taking steps to potentially roll back the Artemis II rocket and Orion spacecraft to the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB) at the agency’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida after overnight Feb. 21 observing interrupted flow of helium in the SLS (Space Launch System) rocket’s interim cryogenic propulsion stage. Helium flow is required for launch. Teams are actively reviewing data, and taking steps to enable rollback positions for NASA to address the issue as soon as possible while engineers determine the best path forward. In order to protect for troubleshooting options at both Pad B and the VAB, teams are making preparations to remove the pad access platforms installed yesterday, which have wind-driven constraints and cannot be removed during high winds, which are forecasted for tomorrow. This will almost assuredly impact the March launch window. NASA will continue to provide updates.
https://www.nasa.gov/blogs/missions/2026/02/21/nasa-troubleshooting-ar temis-ii-rocket-upper-stage-issue-p reparing-to-roll-back/
>>
File: homeless SLS.jpg (46.8 KB)
46.8 KB JPG
>>16917734
>>
File: link.jpg (23.6 KB)
23.6 KB JPG
>>16917734
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: KSC future.jpg (599.9 KB)
599.9 KB JPG
>2154 AD
>Indian-descended Floridians roll out the SLS shrine for the yearly Scrub Festival as they have done for generations, the original meaning long since lost. 100 oxen pull the gaudy flower-covered transporter along a road of crushed Alabama river sand, some faithful pilgrims throw themselves beneath the treads for blessings in the next life
>>
File: GOOLD.jpg (130.2 KB)
130.2 KB JPG
>>16917721
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16917747
the problem is hydrogen. people think using a molecule that can leak through solid objects is a good idea. it isnt. its like programmers using 0 for false and 1 for true. just because you can doesnt mean you should.
>>
File: 1751583489140273.jpg (63.5 KB)
63.5 KB JPG
>>16917734
>>
>>
File: 43247234892.png (43 KB)
43 KB PNG
Elon Musk will skip Mars and go to Mercury instead. Because there is a higher solar irradiance, and what they learned on the Moon is much more applicable on Mercury than on Mars. My prediction is that he will start tweeting about going to Mercury around the time BepiColombo starts orbiting Mercury.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16916656
I can explain. Rejecting heat to a hotter environment is extremely inefficient, especially as the difference grows. Contrary to the opposite case (heating), your waste heat works against you and any particular design will simply have a maximum achievable temperature difference.
In the case of a sealed vessel, no work at all is required to maintain pressure. It’s hard to imagine a worse comparison.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: IMG_2595.jpg (805.6 KB)
805.6 KB JPG
>>16917734
helium valves are absolutely relentless
>>
>>
>>16917792
actual retard
>>16917794
is there a cold part of Venus where you can perform excavation? I'm unaware of any
>>16917798
actual retard
>>
>>16917802
Oh you can't read. I said you could pump cold air into the excavation site, like how you can pump breathable air into an excavation site on Mars.
You then said cooling isn't comparable to pumping air which made me think you couldn't read. Thanks for confirming it.
No cooling is needed to take already cold air and move it somewhere.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1749376511707072.jpg (123.4 KB)
123.4 KB JPG
/SFG/ BTFO
>Why Nuclear Thermal Rockets are Pointless
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nFrVo19vCNA
>>
File: Jeff Bezos 4.jpg (560.4 KB)
560.4 KB JPG
God, this off-season is really long
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1765591626742508.png (129.1 KB)
129.1 KB PNG
>>16917734
I just want to see a lunar landing in my lifetime is it really that hard to ask?
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1601296276261.jpg (568.4 KB)
568.4 KB JPG
>>16917823
>Why is SLS such a piece of shit?
>>
File: 0 Hay Hay.jpg (214.5 KB)
214.5 KB JPG
"Hey Hey! Takes us to Mount Splashmore now!"
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16917805
>Things in insulated boxes do can remain at a different temperature than environment around the box for a period of time
>Boxes can be moved
Which one is disproved by high school knowledge of thermodynamics?
>>
>>
File: trappist 1e.png (2.7 MB)
2.7 MB PNG
This actually exists btw
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
Fuck!
>>16917867 is for this retard >>16917855
>>
>>
>>
>>16917871
forgot to paste the link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YhU4DwzzEKs
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 2026-02-21-001019.png (705.7 KB)
705.7 KB PNG
bringing "cold air" from Venuses upper atmosphere with insulated pressure vessels to a surface base which is another insulated pressure vessels is basically the same as cooling earth down by dropping a giant ice cube into the ocean a la Futurama, but somehow even more retarded
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0SYpUSjSgFg
>>
>>16917882
how about compressing the heat into very dense bricks and just ejecting them out onto the venusian surface? a rover could just leave a trail of them as it trundles ever onwards, like goats do with their little poo balls.
>>
File: happening.jpg (13 KB)
13 KB JPG
>>16917734
Get this: ICPS is a Delta IV derived upper stage. The tooling for said upper stage has been dismantled!
>>
File: spacenews.png (647.4 KB)
647.4 KB PNG
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
Space junk returning to Earth is introducing metal pollution to the pristine upper atmosphere as it burns up on re-entry, a new study has found.
Published today in the journal Communications Earth & Environment, the study was led by Robin Wing from the Leibniz Institute of Atmospheric Physics in Germany. Using highly sensitive lasers, he and his team of international researchers observed a plume of lithium pollution, tracking it back to the uncontrolled re-entry of a discarded Space X Falcon 9 rocket upper stage.
Elon destroying Earth's atmosphere. Killing all life on the planet.
>>
>>
>>
>artemis has to roll back
>multi day process
>unspecified repair
>probably 2 weeks
>roll back to the pad
>multi day process
>another WDR
>3 days
>week to analyze data
>assuming everything checks out (it never does) it can launch
>month until the next launch window
>anything can go wrong in that month go delay the entire thing
im starting to understand why there are so many moon landing denialists. it seems impossible that nasa launched 17 apollo missions (9 of them went to the moon) in like 3 years back in the late 1960s
>>
>>
>>16917874
Explain your whole idea in one post, including what the excavators are doing, where the cold air is coming from and what it has to do with pressurized vessels on Mars.
Otherwise just admit that it's dumb.
>>
>>
>>
File: NASA then vs now.jpg (1.9 MB)
1.9 MB JPG
>>16917902
>>
>>
>>
>>16917921
they'd all been through a war too. just listening to those guys talk and reading their books, they were tough, confident and smart and eminently practical from the engineers to the control staff to the pilots. and yeah, the risk didn't make people flinch much.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 40k imperial guard winter assault.jpg (92.1 KB)
92.1 KB JPG
>>16917955
It's almost like "Guardsman"
>>
File: 2026-02-22-001022.png (174.1 KB)
174.1 KB PNG
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2025352946733490471
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: artemis_1_red_team_arrival_next_to_sls.jpg (246.4 KB)
246.4 KB JPG
FUCK YOU JARED
MAKE THEM TAKE A MANLIFT AND FIX IT ON THE PAD LIKE SPACEX DO
YOU KNOW YOU WANT TO
>>
File: MSS%20on%20crawler.jpg (89.9 KB)
89.9 KB JPG
>>16918012
We used to be a serious country
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16917905
The excavators dig things, possibly just Venusian regolith, that can be processed into things, as things are needed to live.
The excavation area needs to be cooled because 400° is too hot for humans or semiconductor based computers to operate. So, an insulated box with at least two air locks is created on the surface.
At ~52km, where temperatures are only 32° but the atmosphere is still desner than Earth's is at Sea Level, an air capture and cooling facility is suspended.
Balloons each take a trailer's worth of air down to the surface and pump in that cold air to the surface base after a valve pumps the same amount of stale air out. This needs to be repeated constantly because material scientists are cucks and don't have a perfect thermal insulator, and because humans and machines generate heat while excavating things.
This has to do with pressurized vessels on Mars, because they prove you can circulate air, as humans turn Oxygen into Poison, and you would need to constantly add more oxygen while removing the CO2 to keep people alive, all while pressure gradually leaks out from mechanical imperfections that would inevitably exist in buildings able to have 8,000+ people live and work in and around them.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16918044
Correct. And if the latest findings are true, the Venusian clouds might be 60% water, making life much easier for the sky station.
https://phys.org/news/2025-10-venus-clouds-reanalyzed.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1704606351459508.jpg (629.8 KB)
629.8 KB JPG
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16918076
ISRO's GSLV does that
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geosynchronous_Satellite_Launch_Vehicle
>>
>>
>>
>>
>New data suggests dark energy may not be constant.
>Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument(DESI) map hints dark energy density changed and expansion slowing.
>Some physicists calculate weakening dark energy could lead to Big Crunch in 20 billion years, breaking standard cosmology model.
Big happenings (again) in the cosmology world
>>
>>
File: 4844674.png (791.5 KB)
791.5 KB PNG
You don't need cooling to operate on Venus.
Rover that doesn't need electricity
https://www.nasa.gov/general/automaton-rover-for-extreme-environments- aree-2/
Semiconductors which can withstand the conditions on Venus
https://techport.nasa.gov/projects/92917
Maybe there is some way you could mine on the surface and somehow bring it to the sky but even if, can it compete with mining asteroids and flying the needed resources to Venus?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16918124
>Maybe there is some way you could mine on the surface and somehow bring it to the sky
Just have a big scoop with a balloon connected to a canister of liquid nitrogen. It will gradually boil off, then once it's all boiled it will quickly expand and become buoyant. lifting the rig back into the upper atmosphere
>>
File: mechanical rover proposal 2026-02-22 20-38-46.png (350.6 KB)
350.6 KB PNG
>>16918124
Interesting
>>
>>
>>16918153
How's it supposed to take any measurements without any electronics at all? They talk about signalling but not about how it actually does any work down there. Maybe it could blindly take a sample and send it back up.
Just seems like a grift. This Saunder fag has been working on it since 2017.
>>
>>
File: 296385495.png (1.2 MB)
1.2 MB PNG
>>16918156
https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/niac_2016_phasei_saund er_aree_tagged.pdf
>>
>>
>>16918157
1 gravitationally bound mass of rock, ore, and basic resources like water with an atmosphere that is, while thin, non-corrosive and thick enough to provide meaningful radiation shielding and the potential for melt or minor gas-addition based terraforming efforts.
>>
File: 1747975432602622.jpg (523.7 KB)
523.7 KB JPG
>>
>>16918076
strangely enough that would describe how the Voyager probes worked. they were placed in orbit on a liquid fueled launch vehicle and attained their trajectory towards Jupiter using a solid fuel kick stage.
>>
File: nasa giant tortoise.png (936.1 KB)
936.1 KB PNG
Good news: we might not ever return to the moon but we are returning giant tortoises back to Galapagos.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16917918
Does anyone else have this feeling that it's all just a scheme for these people to leech money?
They don't actually care about launching anything on the moon, these tests and delays can go on forever because there will always be a reason for another delay.
Meanwhile they still get funded cause politicians are afraid of China doing it first. It's the same with Musk and his "let's go to Mars" bullshit.
In fact one should be afraid that they won't delay it, cause what if something goes wrong during the launch? Then it's over for good.
>>
>>
>>16918204
I think people underestimate just how difficult these programs really are. I think the real answer lies somewhere between grift and genuine desire and interest and along the way they're subject to political whims and technical issues.
>>
>>
File: spacex turtle shell.jpg (928 KB)
928 KB JPG
>>16918180
TTD
>>
>>
>>
>>16918210
>I think people underestimate just how difficult these programs really are.
I understand this i just don't think that these time tables are even remotely realistic, especially if you consider the economic situation in the world right now. Mid 2030s if we're lucky.
>>
File: 2026-02-22-001023.png (248.2 KB)
248.2 KB PNG
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2025567596183998940
>>
>>
File: 1745677205987.png (135.8 KB)
135.8 KB PNG
>>16918226
No, this is retarded, we should be doing better than we we 50 years ago, 50 years before the last moonlanding rockets didn't exist yet, the very basic understandings of Space were being penned and the radio wasn't standard equipment for every private in a military yet.
It took 9 years for the Saturn project to go from work begining to Saturn V landing people on our moon. Only 5 and a half to get Saturn I orbit.
It has been 15 years, it took 11 years for the first orbital flight.
>>
>>16918032
This proposal fundamentally ignores the crushing reality of Venusian physics, specifically regarding pressure, buoyancy, and thermodynamics.
First, the surface of Venus operates at roughly 90 times Earth's atmospheric pressure, meaning any surface structure must be an extreme pressure vessel akin to a deep-sea submarine, not merely an "insulated box." Second, physically dragging a balloon of lower-density, 1-atmosphere air from 52 kilometers down to the surface would require colossal energy just to overcome the immense buoyant force of the dense lower atmosphere. Third, if that air were compressed to survive the ambient surface pressure during descent, rapid adiabatic heating would cause its temperature to skyrocket, entirely nullifying its use as a coolant. Finally, the thermal mass of a "trailer's worth" of air is hopelessly insufficient to offset the relentless heat transfer from a 460°C supercritical environment. Comparing this to Mars is inherently flawed, as Mars requires containing internal pressure in a cold vacuum, whereas Venus requires surviving catastrophic external pressure and blistering heat.
Would you like me to run the thermodynamic math on exactly how hot that air would get if compressed to Venusian surface pressure?
>>
>>16918032
Venus’s 92-bar, 464 °C surface instantly crushes and roasts any insulated box or airlock through conduction, 17 kW/m2 radiation, and convection, while the proposed balloons deliver no coolant whatsoever: the 52 km CO2, upon forced descent, compresses adiabatically and conducts ambient heat to arrive hundreds of degrees hotter than the base, and the repeated energy required to overcome buoyancy and drag for trailer-scale volumes generates far more internal heat than it could ever remove, in machinery that dissolves in sulfuric acid under the crushing differential. Mars 1-bar habitats inside vacuum prove nothing about resisting 92 bar of superheated corrosive gas that is trying to flood inward through every joint.
>>
>>16918032
The proposal collapses on basic thermodynamics and mechanics.
First, air lowered from ~52 km would be compressed and heated adiabatically as it descends, so it arrives hot, not cold; any “cooling” is erased before delivery.
Second, continuously moving and pumping dense gas through a ~50 km gravity well against Venus’s enormous atmospheric pressure requires vast work—orders of magnitude more energy than any plausible excavation could supply—making net cooling impossible.
Third, balloons there have limited buoyancy and payload; lifting “trailers’ worth of air” repeatedly is physically unrealistic.
Fourth, an “insulated box with airlocks” on a 400 °C surface ignores heat flow through structure, seals, and moving machinery, which would overwhelm any insulation.
Finally, the Mars analogy is irrelevant: Mars habitats manage small internal leaks, not continuous, planet-scale heat and pressure exchange with a supercritical atmosphere.
>>
>>
>>16918032
The balloon scheme collapses on a basic physical fact: Venus's surface atmospheric pressure is roughly 90 times Earth's, while at 52 km it is approximately 1 atmosphere. A balloon buoyant at 52 km cannot descend to the surface, because the crushing ambient pressure below would compress and destroy it long before it arrived — it would need rigid walls thick enough to withstand ~89 additional atmospheres, at which point it is no longer a balloon but an implausibly heavy pressure vessel. More importantly, the work required to push any gas from 1 atm down into a 90 atm environment is thermodynamically enormous; you are not passively delivering cool air, you are fighting a pressure gradient equivalent to pumping fluid nearly a kilometer underwater, continuously, for every breath taken. The "cold air" itself is also Venusian CO2, not oxygen, so it cools the habitat but does not sustain life without a separate separation process the proposal ignores entirely. The Mars comparison actually undercuts the argument rather than supporting it: Mars requires pressurizing outward against near-vacuum, which is structurally and energetically the opposite problem from Venus's surface, so demonstrated Mars techniques say nothing useful about surviving 90 atm and 465°C.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16918266
A submarine is a water balloon. Otherwise, Zepplins aren't balloons since they use rigid internals, too.
>>16918251
>vessel akin to a deep-sea submarine
Is 1km "deep sea" now.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: canadapoke.jpg (1.1 MB)
1.1 MB JPG
>>16918279
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16918204
Women just wanna feel good about themselves and get socially affirmed that they're doing a hecking good
If society overnight changed and would socially affirm genocide women would do it (they already do, abortion...)
>>
>>
File: htfhf.jpg (171.4 KB)
171.4 KB JPG
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L96asfTvJ_A
>Explaining Why NASA's Starliner Report Is So Bad
>>
File: Alysa Liu_2026 Winter.png (442.6 KB)
442.6 KB PNG
>>16918288
>>16918290
>overhyped event with cringey commentators
>too much internal drama
>billions wasted on training and equipment
>happens every 4 years
>pic unrelated
>be SLS
>>
>>
File: marsshadow_opportunity_1024.jpg (150.3 KB)
150.3 KB JPG
>>
>>16918299
Manley believes Calypso lost the forward/backward degree of freedom during initial docking attempt. The aft thrusters in bottom and starboard dog houses had failed, leaving only some on the top and port sides functional.
The failure to dock wasn't from abundance of prudence in risk assessment. Calypso at one point physically could not approach ISS without rotating off axis, and it certainly could not dock without crashing into ISS.
Also there probably were nitrogen tetroxide leaks everywhere which caused all sorts of problems.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>capsule that almost fucking kills it's crew and leaves them stranded on the ISS is called calypso
>after the greek myth of calypso, where a woman keeps a man captive and stranded on an island.
they couldn't have picked a better fucking name for it honestly, meme magic does it's work again.
>>
File: bf1_zeppelin_death.webm (2.9 MB)
2.9 MB WEBM
>>16918243
Didn't we establish that he keeps "forgetting" airships?
>>
File: 2026-02-22-001024.png (16.1 KB)
16.1 KB PNG
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2025485689811345812
>>
>>
>>
File: 1740914883451900.jpg (889.3 KB)
889.3 KB JPG
>>16918315
get outta here with that pussy shit
blue ghost is cooler
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
Venus atmosphere means your dirigibles can rise/fall just by taking on ballast
Nothing needs to be manned, no pressure vessel nonsense, only need to keep the electronics cool unless we develop stuff that'll work at 500 degrees
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16918388
The Cube, it's just a big ass freighter constructed in space, which only goes back and forth between Mars and Earth. Ships only fly up and down from the surface to move stuff from the Cube. I will ignore all energy requirements or orbital mechanics in favor of it being cool
>>
>>
File: philo-farnsworth-in-lab-2310016610.jpg (97.6 KB)
97.6 KB JPG
>>16918395
fusion happens all the time m8
get out of your basement and look up to the sky sometime, there's like big balls of fusion fire up there
>>
>>
>>
>>16918391
if starship is flying then going wider is the only way to go if they want to improve it.
Funny how Starship continued getting closer to ITS with each iteration, but now they are stuck with pencil Starship because at first they scaled down it way too much.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: Screenshot_20260222-185335.png (383.8 KB)
383.8 KB PNG
>>16918388
Construction of the Sky Ladder with anchor points (counterweights) of 6000t, located 120000km away.
>>
>>
>>
>>16918399
Aside from the silly Borg shape why this should be bad?
The voyage takes months and a big vehicle has advantages in terms of living space, possibly some artificial gravity by rotation, safer life support because of redundancy.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16918441
The DeltaV required to deorbit a large enough object to destoy a planet is less, but like interplanetary war is MADness, not to mention how having less population and more consumer upkeep would effect the Martian ability to build rockets.
>>
>>
>>
>>16918326
not wrong, but that was evidence for a different problem: exhaust impingement causing overheating. The helium leaks and weird acid byproducts were the evidence for N2O4 leaks degrading the non-space-rated O-rings.
>>
File: oof.jpg (30.5 KB)
30.5 KB JPG
>>16918300
>>be SLS
oof
>>
File: 2026-02-22-001025.png (256.2 KB)
256.2 KB PNG
https://x.com/travelgov/status/2025636042007605353
Tamapaulitas is the state on the other side of the border of starbase
>>
>>
File: tyjtyj.jpg (251.5 KB)
251.5 KB JPG
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hl94aiKfR8U
>Big Things Are Happening For Starship V3
>>
File: SLS YWNBAW copypasta.jpg (171.6 KB)
171.6 KB JPG
>>16917734
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>Marshall is, without question, feeling the heat of the private sector. SpaceX already delivers cargo to the International Space Station, and the company’s founder, Elon Musk, says his proposed Falcon 9 Heavy rocket should ready by next year. If successful, Musk’s rocket would lift 53 metric tons to orbit, nearly as much as the 70 tons of the SLS’s initial configuration. Musk’s rocket will fly for a small fraction of the cost of the SLS, and has cost American taxpayers nothing to develop.
>Yet the Falcon 9 Heavy is no sure bet, and though he’s diplomatic, May can’t resist taking a shot at it.
>The SpaceX rocket’s development has been shrouded in secrecy, and arguably it’s more complex than the SLS. The NASA rocket has just four main engines, but Musk’s heavy-lift rocket straps together three of his Falcon 9 rockets, and each of those rockets is powered by nine smaller engines.
>Complexity is the enemy of rocketry, because the more complex a system is, the more ways in which it can fail. So proponents of the SLS point out that only four big engines need to be lit for its launch, whereas the Falcon Heavy needs 27.
https://www.houstonchronicle.com/local/item/NASA-Adrift-Part-2-29938.p hp
>>
File: 1756258905807488.jpg (977.8 KB)
977.8 KB JPG
>>16918510
Oh the days of thinking 27 engines was a lot.
>>
>>16918388
>Use starship to create a orbital elevator
>use orbital elevator to create a big spacestation factory/spaceport
>create large NTR spaceships at your spacefactory
>explore&colonize the solarsystem.
>start mining the asteroid belt
>use unlimited resources to create massive o'neill cylinders at all the lagrange points
>move humanity to the o'neill cylinders
>clean up earth and return everything not worth saving back to nature.
>turn earth in to a nature reserve&massive museum of humanity&vacation resort.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1598231476191.png (160.4 KB)
160.4 KB PNG
>>16918527
>If you fuck around with us, if you do something bad to us, we are gonna do things to you that have never been done before
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 2026-02-23-001027.png (25.2 KB)
25.2 KB PNG
https://x.com/Robotbeat/status/2025651918630977811
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1590334785030.png (411.6 KB)
411.6 KB PNG
>Just catched up on the news
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: fhtfhtf.jpg (225.7 KB)
225.7 KB JPG
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5_zhr5Z6KuU
>"The Gigabay's Next Level" | SpaceX Starbase
>>
>>
>>
File: 1000024888.jpg (1.3 MB)
1.3 MB JPG
She's live!
https://www.youtube.com/live/Q4Tl4kbEO3I
>>
>>
>>
File: 1670320651082859.jpg (170.1 KB)
170.1 KB JPG
>>16918607
>catched
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16918651
this is awful!
Very surface level.
Reads 1 line off the powerpoint then spends 5min reading and thanking donations
Goes on retarded tangents: >gamers don't look up ->tarkov->streamers that were in the military that play tarkov teach me stuff
Let me know when Ria goes live with Starlink Group 840-756.
>>
>>
>>16918688
mission control looks like a joke. some bitch eating food the whole time, fatass at capcom would literally die if he had to get up in a hurry, a fucking snack table like its kindergarten. youd think mission control of all places would have some standards
god id love to go in there and fire everyone
>>
I don't mean this to be snarky or anything but remember that there was a time before Falcon 9 rampup activity w/ starlink, I'd say around covid when that started and we started getting a bajillion F9 launches, and at that time Atlas V was considered America's workhorse rocket.
Just trying to point out that Atlas V is/was pretty good, and it's funny to think that there's a real possibility that it only launches one (1) human launch ever, and that Butch and Suni might be THE ONLY humans to ever fly on Atlas V
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 2cb5d54d11dd5ca9.jpg (28.8 KB)
28.8 KB JPG
>>16918509
>more thruster failures than entire apollo program combined
>>
>>
>>16918748
>Cryo test
[math]\unicode{x2705}[/math]
>Engines installed
[math]\unicode{x2705}[/math]
>Static fire
[math]\unicode{x2705}[/math]
Let's goooo!! Starship flight 12 FTW
[math]\unicode{x1F680}[/math][math]\unicode{x1F680}[/math]
>>
>>
>>16918754
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2015657360253960418
>>
>>
>>16918680
Eh, it's about on par with what I'd expect the average JSC/KSC visitor would take away from the experience. They got her
It's actually extremely rare to see ANYONE talking about spaceflight in admiration so even if it was just a summary it's still more than you usually get
>>
File: GhYoUVPW8AAbTaX.jpg (239.7 KB)
239.7 KB JPG
>>16918299
>42 minutes
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: F8Sm9u9aoAAxkn9.jpg (572.7 KB)
572.7 KB JPG
>>16918651
Not my idol
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1764257312561.png (59.8 KB)
59.8 KB PNG
>>16918937
>Post Pandemic
Team politics and celebrity worship isn't new to this decade.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
What’s lil Lonny’s explanation for how we definitely went to the moon and definitely will be back soon and then will definitely be on mars when it’s STILL a coin flip whether his next rocket launch implodes upon reaching suborbital altitudes? Kek.
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1731869503306018.png (1.2 MB)
1.2 MB PNG
>>16918997
I like the idea, but not the artstyle
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
Wait what is the logic behind orbital refueling?
You'd still have to launch all that fuel into orbit first. Might as well just build a larger vehicle with more fuel?
Because that way you get one single launch with multiple stages that can do whatever instead of several launches.
Is it even practical?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16919133
Well for one thing it’s way easier to reuse a 9m or even a 12m Starship, instead of a fucking 30m one or some other obscenely large rocket—and 9m is already about the biggest size payload bay you need even for our heaviest imaginable payloads. You can start colonizing the moon and mars with 9m diam payload bay, 12m might make it a bit easier, but it’s already good at 9 and if you truly have rapid reusability (or at the very least insanely durable reusability with minimal refurb requirements) then it’s really trivial and just requires lots of launches, which oldspace would fall a numbers problem but obviously SX can handle it
>>
>>
>>
>>16919143
>>16919133
>>16919114
>>16919106
>>16919060
>spam/flooding
>>
>>
File: Centaur VACES.png (1.6 MB)
1.6 MB PNG
>>16919133
someone calculated before that one ACES refueled in orbit (which is the Vulcan upper stage minus the advanced features sadly) has more delta-v than a Saturn V can provide. So basically you use much cheaper rockets to do the job of the much more expensive rocket.
>>
>>
File: 2026-02-23-001032.png (39 KB)
39 KB PNG
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2026011919950238056
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1770002239403458.jpg (189.7 KB)
189.7 KB JPG
literally nothing happening in days for what is supposed to be the busiest year ever for spaceflight
>>
>>
File: 4043.jpg (584.9 KB)
584.9 KB JPG
>>16919106
yeah
>>
>>