Thread #16919256
File: 1770091962080676.png (766.3 KB)
766.3 KB PNG
March? We meant April edition
previous >>16916464
1045 RepliesView Thread
>>
>>
>>
File: 189213545109.jpg (20 KB)
20 KB JPG
>>16919256
Five more days of pointless chattering by people with little to no professional training in spaceflight or anything remotely connected to it.
>>
File: 1753514329768.jpg (224.3 KB)
224.3 KB JPG
Zepplins are a sub-sub category of Balloons. But they are balloons.
>>
>>16919258
When we operate the SSTO vehicle for easy space access.
>>
>>
File: The Hedonistic Imperative - David Pearce.jpg (10.4 KB)
10.4 KB JPG
Space colonization will most likely increase future suffering. Life spreading to other planets means that the amount of suffering produced will increase exponentially, if life in the future is on average bad.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7nsv4n_Bgk
https://reducing-suffering.org/omelas-and-space-colonization/
>>
>>16919258
SLS is delayed because its an unproven system. Once a rocket gets ~10 launches there's no real reason to delay at least as far as the rocket is concerned. except a day or two for weather, but thats just a fact of life.
new projects like mars missions and things will keep being a launch window or two late just because each one is a completely novel project with a lot of moving parts.
>>
>>
File: antidepressants.webm (1.7 MB)
1.7 MB WEBM
>>16919271
>Life is a net good actually and it has been most times and most places in human history.
Prove it
>>
>>
>>
>>16919268
>suffering is bad (I should never work out)
>life is net suffering (kill yourself NOW to end it please)
>the more total suffering there is the worse it is (whether or not an African child is starving right now is discernible to me and matters)
There are so many retarded premises in this one.
>>16919273
Follow through on your premises. Is the rest of your life net bad too?
>>
>>
>>
File: 1763388751039.jpg (65.2 KB)
65.2 KB JPG
>Mentioning an eceleb unprompted
>>
>>
>>16919268
>>16919273
>Fatalistic nihilism
By their own philosophy, the best argument to refute these guys is to kill them.
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 423948239482.jpg (194.3 KB)
194.3 KB JPG
>>16919305
BepiColombo was supposed to have a lander but they canceled it.
>After arriving on Mercury’s surface during ESA’s BepiColombo mission, this lander is expected to deploy instruments with a micro-rover (left) and to penetrate the surface with a ‘mole’ (below).
https://www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Images/2001/11/BepiColombo_s_lander
>>
now that its confirmed that spacex is polluting the atmosphere with toxic particles, can we finally enforce mandatory recycling of manmade space objects? if you want to bring them back to earth then they need to be brought back for recycling. space companies need to be forced to pay the recycle companies too.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16919319
>>16919315
My logic is fallacious, Red Pandas exist, Red Pandas are not Pandas, I would never accept people trying to convince me they are.
Zepplins are not Balloons, Submarines are not Balloons.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 2026-02-24-001033.png (35.4 KB)
35.4 KB PNG
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2026053135270334515
>>
>>
>>
File: 6cip11ky34lg1.jpg (1.3 MB)
1.3 MB JPG
>>
>>
>>
File: Ohnonono.png (45.5 KB)
45.5 KB PNG
>>16919378
They’re in a delusional cult anon, go easy on them.
>>
File: Spacecolony3edit.jpg (102.1 KB)
102.1 KB JPG
>>16919378
Artificial colonies are fine too
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: gjyfgyj.jpg (169.8 KB)
169.8 KB JPG
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=76Lw5LBCXYI
>Starbase Pad 2 Flooded! | Starship Update
>>
>>16919396
My assumption without googling is that carbon is highly volatile but heavy enough to stick around [in a tenuous atmosphere], and abundant enough in the solar system to be accounted for with constant micrometeorite impacts and space weathering.
The more fun answer is that there are secret semi-surficial deposits we haven't found yet and that there is enough native residual carbon to make methane ISRU a possibility. Though I bet even if that WERE the case it would be a limited resource and would require geological exploration and deposit source area consumption
>>
>>
>farmers are starting to refuse to sell their land to create more data centers
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/02/im-not-for-sale-farmers-re fuse-to-take-millions-in-data-cente r-deals
just more evidence that data centers in space will become the most economically viable way of doing things
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
Highly violotiale will mean different things to different fields of science. The fact that carbon doesn't literally explode when exposed to air or water means something, if Carbon is "highly violotile," what do you call potassium "super violotile"?
>>
>>16919432
It is believed that when the Moon formed, with an object slamming in to Earth and a debris ring then coalescing into a ball of melt, that yes Carbon was very volatile in that regime and that explains why the Moon is extremely carbon hyper-deficient... but otherwise maintains almost the exact same fingerprint refractory mineral ratios as terrestrial Earth rocks with less volatile minerals that can survive melts such as plag feldspar and olivine and pyroxine with oxygen atoms
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: images.png (11.3 KB)
11.3 KB PNG
>>16919437
Ironically it seems like there's plenty of iron on the moon
>>
>>16919437
From what I remember the explanation for a lack of iron oxide minerals has more to do with the geophysicists believing it has to do with Theia's mantle material (heavy iron) being retained deep within Earth's lower mantle while Theia's upper mantle and crust (way less iron) is what took the glancing blow and was ejected into orbit to form the Moon. I don't know the geochemical explanation off the top of my head, been a long time since I have thought about this I must admit
>>
>>16919424
>>16919428
You always have the atmosphere in nevada so you can make a giant heatsink
>>
File: Jared hothead.png (634.9 KB)
634.9 KB PNG
Those radiators don't seem to be working so well.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16919299
>>16919281
>>16919277
>>16919273
life is so good I want to take it from other people
>>
I don't feel like waiting for the 300 second cooldown so hello /sfg/
Do you think chemistry class is nerfed to keep people from making drugs and blowing shit up? They have all sorts of machinist classes in addition to theoretical mechanics classes but no one offers practical laboratory classes you could use to put what they teach in chemistry to too much use.
>>
>>
>>
>>16919461
Yeah, I am in those classes right now and I quite like it, but I feel like the gap between language used at the hardware store and class is wider than the gap between my my physics based engineering classes.
>>
>>16919463
https://www.youtube.com/@duganashley1337/videos
okay, now the question is only of theoretical interest
>>
>>
File: the-pacifist-richard-hescox.jpg (123.8 KB)
123.8 KB JPG
This is what Elon wants to do with "rail guns" on the Moon. Despicable
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: yes2.jpg (25.7 KB)
25.7 KB JPG
>>16919471
>>
>>
>>
File: Artemis_I_heat_shield.jpg (3.1 MB)
3.1 MB JPG
>>16919258
>spoils your whole lunar program
heh, nothin' personal
>>
>>
File: 1738200009919507.jpg (601.5 KB)
601.5 KB JPG
Any word on if NASA even has the tooling for the ICPS?
>>
>>
>>
File: 1419218488944.png (251.7 KB)
251.7 KB PNG
with V3 we'll finally make it orbit on flight 12
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: Ascender 9 flew.jpg (82 KB)
82 KB JPG
>>16919264
>>16919331
Incorrect. Of course, it is considered a spaceplane
>>
File: B O R E D.gif (2.9 MB)
2.9 MB GIF
LAUNCH SOME FUKKEN STICKS
>>
>>
>>
>>
>Mach 0-3 normal ramjet usage or potential rocket boost
>Mach 3-5 begin alkali seeding, air beginning ionization
>magnetohydrodynamic generator turns on
>kinetic energy of the incoming ionized hypersonic air is immediately converted to electrical energy through interaction with a transverse magnetic field via the Hall Effect
>energy is stored for supercooling of the accelerator saddle magnets + other magnetic systems in SMES/supercapacitors/superconducting flywheel(s)
>allows for creation of a plasma bubble to reduce drag
>plasma field can also be used to steer/bounce off of atmosphere
>plasma firld creates a virtual cowl allowing for ideal airflow and “shock on lip” condition
>Mach 5-8 natural air ionization dominant
>massive energy extraction
>MHD accelerator gains energy proportional to increase in speed running in tandem with the MHD generator
>mach 20+ flight and space access
>plasma braking for reentry
Id say why havent they done this yet but they already have and have for decades now
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 470173main_magnetosphere2_full-2-1024x768-1.jpg (237.5 KB)
237.5 KB JPG
>>16919366
lack of magnetic field is the primary issue and a big deal but somehow midwits like to pretend magnetosphere is unnecessary even though we'd all die without it.
>bro dude, it's so simple you just like, launch a rocket from this floating ball and like land on that other red ball, if we did that on the moon why can't we do mars lol
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: Horizon Warhead on Replicator planet.mp4 (1.9 MB)
1.9 MB MP4
>>16919471
One of the best scenes in Stargate, hands down.
>>
>>
File: HB4PAm1aUAAq14_.jpg (69.1 KB)
69.1 KB JPG
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16919666
20.5 Earth years. Assuming the human body doesn't heal itself in any way and perfectly retains radiation damage. The expected death rate of taking 5 sieverts in a single acute does is 50%. At the rate of irradiation received on the Martian surface, it would take 20.5 years to have a 50% chance of killing you, assuming humans are perfect black bodies.
>>
>>
File: dedc9c82a8bbf9378921b752973b1620.jpg (84.4 KB)
84.4 KB JPG
Why are all of NASA's previous rockets not considered commercial, when it was all designed and built by external companies? The Saturn V is as much Boeing as is SLS.
>>
>>
>>
File: Hegseth Tenacity.png (1.1 MB)
1.1 MB PNG
>At Colorado space firms, Hegseth casts Pentagon bureaucracy as the enemy
Hegseth contrasts “builders” with Beltway primes as administration leans into procurement overhaul
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16919691
>>16919690
In fact, I could do a substantially better job than the IAU at defining all the things and how they are different from them.
I definitely wouldn't define Mercury as not a planet and then ignore my own definition.
>>
>>
The School of Space Exploration was unveiled in Beijing, aiming to provide talent for deep-space exploration and space science. The school will build a curriculum covering 14 first-level disciplines/major categories, including aerospace science and technology and planetary science. In addition to the existing 97 courses, 22 new core courses will be added, covering directions such as interstellar dynamics and propulsion principles, interstellar travel, environment perception and utilization, planetary dynamics and habitability, and interstellar sociology and governance.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16919720
No, exotic is a subjective term, so nothing can be exotic as a fact. I am probably not exotic to you, considering you speak English, meaning we most likely share a similar culture and are part of the same subspecies.
All humans are exotic to Europans, since we don't share any evolutionary history and therefore don't look much alike, down to the fact we don't have the same number of limbs.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: hq720.jpg (81.7 KB)
81.7 KB JPG
>>16919742
It'll be like a weather forecast, uhh we'll experience a solar flare in two hours, everybody get into the tunnels if you don't wish to die
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: DRACO.png (345.3 KB)
345.3 KB PNG
Hey NTRfags.
They run on liquid hydrogen. They are heavy. They have solid cores made of uranium which is very heavy. You're talking roughly 10x the dry weight. They are very low thrust. You need shields between the engine and any cargo or crew. They have questionable longevity. Chemical engines will essentially run forever if they are well designed, but NTRs have issues with hydrogen erosion and melting their internals. They are radioactive *as hell* once you start running them. Anything you do with the stage once you start the engine has to take that into consideration. Basically they ruin the mass ratio in the rocket equation. The high isp is pretty much cancelled out by the reduction in mass ratio.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 2026-02-24-001035.png (102 KB)
102 KB PNG
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2026331814135238866
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: HB8WEdHW0AAUt4N.jpg (346.4 KB)
346.4 KB JPG
>Chinese satellite company mizarvision has been publicly leaking US military movements in the Middle East ahead of a conflict with Iran
https://nitter.net/FaytuksNetwork/status/2026362629090861107#m
Isn't this what the space force is for? Why aren't they doing anything to protect the military from foreign spies?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16919831
What does the public leaking have to do with anything. Isn't part of the strategy to amass a strike force and make sure your target knows it's there. I'm sure Iran could obtain these from their Asiatic friends even if they weren't public.
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 4983242039.png (18.8 KB)
18.8 KB PNG
Road delay. I guess it will be a static fire because 4 weeks ago Elon Musk said 6 weeks.
>>
File: National Space Society Space Forum, Feb 19, 2026_ A Conversation with Tory Bruno 56-21 screenshot.png (2 MB)
2 MB PNG
>Today, we put a spacecraft in orbit, and it stays there. The propulsion is either from the rocket that put it there or for station-keeping. Once it's in its raised orbit, it doesn't go anywhere else, except for maybe a small adjustment. We need to be able to maneuver well in an environment where we might be attacked, which is called "dynamic space operations." We need to move assets to safer places, replenish them, and support them. We don't have much of that capability yet, and China is working on threats in orbit every day. This environment is getting worse, and we need to catch up fast. I came to Blue Origin to work on this problem, as I've been concerned about it for a long time. We need to be able to cruise through space like a destroyer or corvette to patrol, surveil, and protect assets.
Tory reveals why he left ULA for Blue
>>
File: National Space Society Space Forum, Feb 19, 2026_ A Conversation with Tory Bruno 1-2-3 screenshot.png (2 MB)
2 MB PNG
>>16919849
>On the human exploration side and the lunar side and the Mars side, we have several vested interests in the moon. The moon is a national security regime. There's a reason why China is going full boore to get there and it's not for the benefit of all mankind. It's because it has strategic value. It is the ultimate high ground and it is rich tremendously rich in resources and even just beyond the moon to the near earth objects um there are imagination defying quantities of rare earth metals uh precious metals helium 3 on the moon and on these asteroids that have just tremendous value and ultimately um have strategic value but also will literally change our human destiny.
The Moon is a national security priority.
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 2026-02-24-001036.png (418.1 KB)
418.1 KB PNG
https://x.com/xDaily/status/2026397062841893006
>>
>>
File: hank johnson.jpg (65.9 KB)
65.9 KB JPG
My fear is that the whole low earth orbit region will be so overly populated with satellites that it will tip over and capsize.
>>
>>
>>
File: AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.jpg (72.8 KB)
72.8 KB JPG
>>16919893
>>
File: hank.jpg (101.6 KB)
101.6 KB JPG
>>16919893
Could it fall on Guam, making it tip over? Get Elon Musk in here.
>>
>>
>>
File: the ummah can into space.png (25.8 KB)
25.8 KB PNG
>>16919706
Even the fucking warlords can into space nowadays
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16919914
Its 5G speed anywhere on the planet in Antartica, in Arctic, in Japan, in Cayman Islands, in Galapagos Island, etc.
150Mbps anywhere in the world with <20 ms latency from smartphone is a serious technical feat. 5G cellular towers only have range of ~1 mile. So if you're not within 1 mile, you're not getting 5G/LTE.
>>
>>
>>
File: 1756470133942230.png (81.9 KB)
81.9 KB PNG
>self driving by 2018
>mars colony by 2018
>hyperloop across america by 2018
>>
>>
>>
>>16919879
>>16919914
That's faster than landline or fixed wireless internet in most of America.
>>
File: file.png (464.4 KB)
464.4 KB PNG
>>16919929
no it isn't
https://www.speedtest.net/global-index/united-states
>>
>>16919848
Static fire then stacc then launch
I love that despite the fact I live in DFW I'm always FUCKING TRAVELING DURING A STARSHIP LAUNCH
I ONLY GOT TO SEE IFT-2 IN PERSON ELON LAUNCH MORE STARSHIPS SO I CAN DRIVE DOWN AND SEE THEM
>>
>>
>>
File: 1763004147859573.png (585.7 KB)
585.7 KB PNG
ISS got a view of kiev being hit by russian missiles
https://www.reddit.com/r/CombatFootage/comments/1rdgngm/iss_timelapse_ captures_ballistic_missile_strikes/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5VHETDtQ_M
~4:05 in the video
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16919952
AI fundamentally can’t be sentient, sentience/agency/vitality is not a product of material manifestation alone. Might as well try to argue effect can precede cause as well. Of course this won’t stop them from trying to mimic the appearance of it but it won’t change the fact that an AI will never be able to act as an independent agent, it will always be beholden to a command/input from a human to act.
>>
>>
>>16919955
It's possible but requires analog structures to the ones in the human brain that interface with the extracausal.
There has to be some sort of quantum interaction in the loop to get an actual Being attached to the computer. No telling what you'd end up with though—probably not a human soul.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: Elementary Dear Data.png (1.5 MB)
1.5 MB PNG
>>16919952
A computer can never be truly sentient no matter how hard we try. We can and will get asymptoticly close, and the distinction between man and machine will become blurred. But it will never be the same thing
>>
New FCC license request
https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/els/reports/STA_Print.cfm?mode=current&appl ication_seq=148899&RequestTimeout=1 000
Purpose of operation:
>To launch and operate space stations on mass simulators for upcoming Starship-Super Heavy test flights. To further test the payload deployment mechanism of the Starship vehicle, SpaceX seeks special temporary authority to launch and operate space stations on mass simulators for upcoming Starship-Super Heavy test flights and use these space stations to communicate with SpaceXs satellite constellation and earth station network for a short duration as those simulators reenter and demise. SpaceX expects the mass simulators to demise within 90 minutes of deployment. These suborbital test flights will originate at Starbase, TX and are expected to reach peak altitudes of up to 350 km.
No. of units:
>10
>Start: 2026-04-07
>End: 2026-06-06
>>
>>
File: 1756401992609301.png (953.9 KB)
953.9 KB PNG
>we're going to mars
>oh no sorry we're going to the moon
>wait wait scratch that we're going to LEO
the meme is real. "we're going to starbase" is next.
>>
File: Fm2j3XwaYAA6EbY.jpg (138.7 KB)
138.7 KB JPG
>NASA is targeting approximately 9 a.m. EST, Wednesday, Feb. 25, to begin rolling the SLS (Space Launch System) rocket and Orion spacecraft for Artemis II off the launch pad and back to the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB) at the agency’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida. Teams will continue to monitor winds and temperatures in advance of the roll.
>The approximately 4-mile trek is expected to take up to 12 hours. Once back in the VAB, teams will immediately begin work to install platforms to access the area of the helium flow issue. Teams also will take advantage of the time in the VAB to replace batteries in the flight termination system and retest it, and replace additional batteries in the upper stage.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: HB9OW2kXsAAbT0y.jpg (295.2 KB)
295.2 KB JPG
Artemis II crew will be at the State of the Union tonight?
https://x.com/gtwhitesides/status/2026425437836992705
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: manifest destiny.png (60 KB)
60 KB PNG
>>16920000
I need to hear the words again
>>
File: rocketman.png (950.7 KB)
950.7 KB PNG
>>16919960
We are literally and unironically building a vessel for Thoth to reincarnate into, and he'll open the way for the rest.
We as a species have always built bodies for the gods using the limits of our technical abilities, and those limits are approaching a bridge to the true divine. It's going to get messy.
Glass the Earth, demigod war eventually.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16919952
>>16919955
>>16919975
>[laughs in binary]
>>
>>
>>
File: file.png (39.2 KB)
39.2 KB PNG
>>16920023
>>
File: does_he_know.jpg (124.9 KB)
124.9 KB JPG
>>16920027
>>
>>
File: 1755851080403256.jpg (189.7 KB)
189.7 KB JPG
>>16919387
titan is the coolest spot body in the solar system and i'm tired of pretending it isn't
>>
>>
>>
File: Screenshot 2026-02-24 233433.png (1.9 MB)
1.9 MB PNG
>>
>>16919922
Back then Musk wasn't on the radar at all. No one thought about Mars as anything but fiction. No one thought LEO constellation was a thing. No one thought commercial/reusable rockets were gonna be a thing. No one thought electric vehicles were going to be a thing. No one thought self driving were ever gonna be a thing in our lifetime. No one thought AI was gonna be a thing. No one thoughts mass produced humanoid robots would be a thing. Hell we even made a scifi TV series depicting daily rocket laucnehs.
They all stayed in the realm of scifi. And now they're all being realized, pushed by 1 man.
1 single fucking man delivered nearly all of them, or are on the verge of delivering all of them.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16920076
>No one thought LEO constellation was a thing
Yeah this is the one that really gets me. It was just the other day that starlink was a highly speculative and risky venture and now it's just normal, part of the background.
>Of COURSE there are thousands of internet satellites in low orbit, why wouldn't there be?
>>
>>
>>16919774
>>16919776
Just send some of the atmosphere to Mars, it would only take a couple ship flights.
>>
>>
>>16919778
hydrogen comes with its problems no matter what sort of engine you try to run it in
>The high isp is pretty much cancelled out by the reduction in mass ratio.
oh you're a retard, nevermind then, sorry for interrupting your crayon snack time
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
why would anyone want to use spacex? how many poor niggas even is there in nebraska that don't have good internet? and yjk those niggas don't got money to fund thousands of rocket launches to maintain the constellation. i bet you can't even game on it because of the latency so it's basically a worthless product that costs billions that's sold to homeless people in third world countries for pennies.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 180ms.jpg (5.4 KB)
5.4 KB JPG
>>16920179
Im playing world of warcraft with 180 ms latency. Server is in France, and I'm in west coast US. Normal fiber (from my old place thats few miles away) latency is also ~180 ms for the same gaming server, for the record. For pinging google.com, I get <20 ms latency on starlink. And even 15ms latency. Avg ping from starlink app shows 20ms latency. 30 watt power usage. Maybe 1 or 2 daily interruption that lasts ~1s on record. That can happen even on any connection for that matter that its completely irrelevant.
A full year of usage of Starlink and its been great. Downloads speeds are getting close to 50 MB/s, that is 400 Mbps speed(up from ~150-200 Mbps a year ago). Uploads are ~30-40Mbps (up from ~15Mbps just a year ago) now.
Pics related. Gaming latency.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1651153615236.jpg (96.9 KB)
96.9 KB JPG
spehs
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16919776
He told you.
>a few solar shades would also be a good start
You cool that shit off and stick it somewhere. Maybe you sequester it in underground wells. Maybe you send it somewhere that could use the carbon.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1744278008011973.png (3.9 MB)
3.9 MB PNG
spehs
>>
File: on-my-way-strut.gif (196.8 KB)
196.8 KB GIF
Uh oh, back to the VAB again
>>
>>16920179
It will never cease to amaze me how few people can even contemplate someone not having access to shit outside the cites.
There is a whole another portion of the population that flat out doesn't exist to urbanites.
>>
>>16920205
its not even for enterprises really, its a very specific service for mass data backhaul, basically replicating a fiber but using satellites (less throughput ofcourse)
Amazon LEO is already going to go after enterprise customers/businesses first instead of regular consumers because Starlink is already there, its a smart way for them to differentiate
>>
>>
>>16920327
my mother's side of the family would be called hillbillies 10 miles from the nearest building in the US and they had serviceable internet in the middle of a forest 30 minutes from the nearest small town in 2003
>>
>>
>>16920330
I think that depends a lot on where you put the dishy
if you have very clear skies (no roof, trees etc in the way), then I don't think there should be many interruptions
the satellite handovers are happening all the time, that is not where interruptions come from, its if the sky is blocked
>>
>>
>>16920333
For the few people that are lucky there is a lot who don't get that privilege.
I can drive 15 mins and it's the difference between having FTTH and DSL (not even cable lmao), from the same ISP no less.
I consider myself lucky with FTTH but everyone else does not.
Most of who I know are on WISPs because of DSL nonsense.
If I had to move, it would be bleak.
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1761826329256960.png (263.7 KB)
263.7 KB PNG
>>16920341
>>
>>
>>16920346
Cum sprinting: who can nut the hardest to propel themselves backwards a distance of three feet. You are allowed to nut as many times as you can muster, while floating towards the finish line at a staggering 0.00019m/s
(message edited, reason: linked to the wrong post)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 8K AI upscaled deadpool screenshot.jpg (10.3 KB)
10.3 KB JPG
>>16920446
so you can't see the blood of slain Martians
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16920330
I can guarantee you that your fixed wireless gets more interruptions than starlink by a long shot. Even in my own home, dumb wifi router latency spikes happen from time to time. And you do that over large distances with lot of disruptions in the middle. What little disruptions from Starlink are themselves unnoticible for gaming, as I said. I play mmo and play with groups of 25+ or 40+. Almost no noticible issues. If you're paying for the same for fixed wireless, you're dumb.
>>
>>
File: 1767695742919615.png (75.4 KB)
75.4 KB PNG
>>16920346
>>
File: Screenshot_3.jpg (181 KB)
181 KB JPG
No wonder BO wants to reuse "Never Tell Me the Odds" for the third NG launch; apparently the third booster is nowhere near complete.
>>
>>16920079
>Sentience is possible, so it should be possible to create a sentient machine. It's basic logic.
That's a non sequitur.
You should argue that if humans are sentient then it's possible for physical processes to give rise to, underlie, etc. sentience. (True)
Then you need to argue that there's no obvious reason that it's only possible for humans to be sentient and not for non-human physical processes. (Likely enough, arguably true)
You still need to argue that this shifts the burden of proof onto those that claim sentient machines are impossible (Normally the default, except that in this case you're trying to argue that sentient machines are possible, so the burden of proof would otherwise be on you).
At the end it amounts to the fact that there's no obvious reason to believe that machine sentience is impossible and that it's reasonable to believe that it's possible absent such evidence. It's a weak argument, but at least it's not nonsense.
>>
>>16920346
@grok if the solar system disappeared and you were in interstellar space in our current location how long would semen propulsion to alpha centauri take. take into account you could perform a burn multiple times a day.
>>
>>
>>16920496
Well it is cheaper than Starlink's fastest plan, about $85/mo, and the Starlink hardware has a substantial upfront cost.
I've been contemplating switching more since they made the hardware rental free, but it seems like you have to go with the max plan to get the free hardware, which would up my monthly cost.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16920516
>>16920518
They do hardware rentals now, at least that was the case in my aera the last time I checked.
Highest plans gets you a free install, loner Starlink Mini and a wifi extender
>>
File: 2026-02-26-001037.png (413.2 KB)
413.2 KB PNG
https://x.com/Jackkk/status/2026715211370213878
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: das kinder.jpg (34.6 KB)
34.6 KB JPG
>>16920511
He should have eaten all of his food
>>
File: HCDL-z0XAAIqIjU.jpg (456.8 KB)
456.8 KB JPG
>>
>>
>>16920557
Not gonna lie the starliner report made all the sunk cost shit actually not cool in the slightest.
At first SLS was "haha look at all the money but it should fly and not kill anyone atleast"
But now you can only think that the same NASA that pushed for the garbage that is starliner has ultimately fielded Artemis 1 and 2 and there is a good chance this thing kills astronauts which really would entomb SLS's Shuttle heritage.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16920565
>>16920572
Even lowlife spacenoids will be smart enough to understand orbital mechanics. They'll already be smarter on average than Earthers from the founder effect, and the unforgiving environment of the colonies and habitats will prune the low end constantly.
>>
File: voyager-max expandable inflatable habitat.png (353.3 KB)
353.3 KB PNG
https://payloadspace.com/voyager-max-space-team-on-expandable-tech/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16920597
Nonsense; everyone said musk couldn’t just cowboy engineer Starship from welded steel and look what they have done. Starship tanks hold immense pressures for sustained amounts of time. You can easily bring a roll of steel and make huge multi-storied tin cans that can hold ~1atm, leaks would be a non-issue and even if they appeared would be an easy remedy.
>>
>>
>>
File: ezgif.com-animated-gif-maker.gif (1.8 MB)
1.8 MB GIF
hubble vs webb
>>
>>
>>16920614
how do astronomy fags cope with the fact that if you went out and bough a telescope and pointed it at that, it would be black with a few white dots
or are they cool with it and mad like me about the pr guys painting rainbows on space
>>
File: 58yzmbe9ocf51-3.jpg (62.9 KB)
62.9 KB JPG
>>16920628
>>
>>
>>16920628
the short answer is that simply being able to conceptualise that what you're seeing is so far and so old is in and of itself cool, and the long answer is that you end up buying astrophotography gear to end up making your own worse versions of these pictures
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: uh oh.png (778.2 KB)
778.2 KB PNG
ULA is not launching Vulcan until an investigation is complete on the solid booster "observations" they've been having lately.
>The U.S. Space Force said it will not fly additional national security missions on United Launch Alliance’s Vulcan rocket until an investigation is completed into a performance anomaly during a Feb. 12 launch.
>A halt in national security launches is a setback for ULA as it seeks to increase Vulcan’s flight rate and establish a steady operational tempo. The company recently projected 18 to 22 launches this year as it works through a backlog of roughly 80 missions spanning military and commercial customers.
>With Vulcan missions on hold, the Space Force is now reliant solely on SpaceX to carry out national security space missions until Vulcan returns to flight.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16920648
>Messier did his observing with a 100 mm (four-inch) refracting telescope from Hôtel de Cluny in downtown Paris, France
Damn. Still though, at least he didn't have to put up with modern-day light pollution.
>>
File: jyjty.jpg (224 KB)
224 KB JPG
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g7850x_Q2NA
>Is Development of SpaceX's Starship Really Slower Than SLS?
>>
>>
File: IMG_0166.jpg (39.2 KB)
39.2 KB JPG
>>16920387
His medical emergency? Too much faith of the heart
>>
>>16920723
kind of a joke to talk about Starship "losing momentum" when comparing it to systems where the max time between launches is the min time for the others
also assuming that the launches where starship blew up didn't result in new data and changes
I'm pretty sure the leaks and problems with pipes/pipe components could have happened in previous flights (meaning that it was somewhat random or they only became problems when the pressures were pushed higher than previously)
SLS is still having problems with basic systems and the development was started 16 years ago and is basically built upon reusing old systems anyway
>>
>>
File: Screenshot 2026-02-26 075330.jpg (190.6 KB)
190.6 KB JPG
Ship 39 is moving to Massys for testing
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: bezo.png (247.9 KB)
247.9 KB PNG
>>16920782
you forgot
>BONG is prospering
Jezos will usher in a new age for the american Man.
>>
File: 1754485885144704.webm (511 KB)
511 KB WEBM
>SpaceX astronauts training for lunar landings ahead of the Artemis III crew
>Could do Mars too
Holy FUCK.. Just when you thought he dropped out he DELIVERS!
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2026673345471852693
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2026673345471852693
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2026673345471852693
>>
File: 1725885053408782.jpg (32.3 KB)
32.3 KB JPG
>>16920813
>>
>>
File: 230308-stokespace-630x364.png (202.3 KB)
202.3 KB PNG
>>16920782
Aren't you forgetting someone?
>>
File: spin launch.jpg (114.8 KB)
114.8 KB JPG
>>16920818
Just one
>>
File: 2026-02-26-001039.png (296.3 KB)
296.3 KB PNG
https://x.com/FelixSchlang/status/2027052190532059353
>>
>>
>>
Been a while since I’ve cared to tune in to a rollout. This new mobile stand looks weird. Also impressive just how damn fast they move the ships up the road now; none of this inching crawling shit that Shuttle and SLS do. This thing is hauling ass down the highway lol
https://www.youtube.com/live/p9YEPLYiL54
>>
File: 1745795068953238.jpg (6.5 KB)
6.5 KB JPG
>>16920826
is this true
>>
File: 2026-02-26-001040.png (655.3 KB)
655.3 KB PNG
>>16920826
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9YEPLYiL54
>>
File: 1742570617549786.png (387.8 KB)
387.8 KB PNG
>chinks have an entire space station next door to their Hubble
kek
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: hfthdrtf.jpg (282.9 KB)
282.9 KB JPG
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3CJjP-XfKQ
>NASA Wants What Musk Wants: Moon Bases and Mars Colonies | Interesting Times with Ross Douthat
>>
>>
File: tyjtfy.jpg (230.1 KB)
230.1 KB JPG
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jg_HVXUWyrw
>Tower 2 Almost Ready for Starship Launch! NEW Starbase Flyover Report 119
>>
>>
File: Hopper.gif (1.7 MB)
1.7 MB GIF
>>16920838
Getting from there to here
>>
>>
>>
File: 2026-02-26-001041.png (17 KB)
17 KB PNG
https://x.com/audrey_decker9/status/2027048287358857330
>>
>>16920771
Dream Chaser was previously scheduled for Q4. Unfortunately, I don't think Vulcan availability was holding it back. They have their own stupid problems.
I'm guessing that non-security missions like Leo (was Kuiper) are going to take up the slack. Next up was supposed to be a GPS satellite in March, but I think that is also considered a security mission and will be moved to Falcon 9.
>>
>>
>>
File: HCGNkYybQAEjWzG.jpg (1.1 MB)
1.1 MB JPG
https://x.com/StarshipGazer/status/2027057286888444104
>A close look at Starship 39's leeward side visible for the first time.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 2026-02-26-001043.png (30 KB)
30 KB PNG
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2027091562057060631
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1759621107770552.jpg (1.3 MB)
1.3 MB JPG
>>16920910
Seems to be gas management for the raptors
>>
>>
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=H2rbQUifAy8
Mars Space Elevator:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=H2rbQUifAy8
>>
File: 1772137622547.jpg (49.5 KB)
49.5 KB JPG
It's time to discuss Umbriel.
>>
Are data centers even economically viable on the ground even if NIMBYism isn't a thing? Aren't these companies burning money to such a huge extent without any clear mega use case to justify the capital expenditures?
>>
>>
File: Iapetus.jpg (140.9 KB)
140.9 KB JPG
for me it's Japetus
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: Screenshot_20260227-075032-970.png (148.7 KB)
148.7 KB PNG
>>16920934
>Japetus
Mistaken spelling due to confusion with a biblical Jew
There was no letter J in the ancient world.
>>
>>16920934
>>16920944
Why is it like that? Flash from the mold?
>>
>>
File: Screenshot_20260227-075910-713.png (529.1 KB)
529.1 KB PNG
No more time wasting science nonsense
>>
>>16920950
Science is important and should be the priority of NASA.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RECuQaaGGfA
>>
>>
>neutron now q4 2026
How does your schedule slip by one entire year within two months?
Early december Peter Beck was still publicly saying that they're working towards a Q1 launch date before that they were shooting for before new years.
What the hell happened that could warrant this much delay?
>>
>>
>>
File: HCHRdrOWQAAQl8D.jpg (481.5 KB)
481.5 KB JPG
stretching time
>>
https://x.com/MollySOShea/status/2027121198212251828
>It was Musk's idea to just hotstage on the second Starship flight. It was pushed after the first flight and then before the second flight, they had a functioning hotstage and it worked the first time
kek
>>
>>
>>
File: HCHcH_yXUAAEfap.jpg (1.2 MB)
1.2 MB JPG
https://x.com/spacex/status/2027143801949618205
>>
File: HCHb8d8bYAAykux.jpg (1.2 MB)
1.2 MB JPG
>>16920979
>>
File: HCHcEXHXEAA8cqm.jpg (1013.7 KB)
1013.7 KB JPG
>>16920982
>>
File: HCHcGSeasAAOM2_.jpg (2.6 MB)
2.6 MB JPG
>>16920983
>>
File: longshot space representative.jpg (716.7 KB)
716.7 KB JPG
>>16920977
reminder https://www.idahostatejournal.com/news/local/logan-man-convicted-for-c hild-pornography-sent-to-prison/art icle_a57b3223-869f-58bb-9b7c-453cd2 a685d9.html
>>
File: 43289472.png (149.1 KB)
149.1 KB PNG
>>16920983
Starship V2 was a failure.
>>
>>16920990
>Starship V2 was a failure.
Arguably, yeah. It went poorly enough that they've given up on Move Fast And Break Things, because they found the tipping point where it's slower to do it that way than to act methodically to clear uncertainty on the ground where they can, even if it needs new ground testing facilities to be built (see >>16920964 ) instead of just YOLOing everything. V2 easily cost them a year.
>>
>>
>>16920996
This is also true. Unfortunately a lot of the risk could have been cleared on the ground first instead of needing to use post-production mitigation techniques to try and address flaws as they were uncovered, and it took four flights to fix every major system flaw that caused major damage or destroyed the ship, with Flight 11, the fifth V2), being the first fully successful flight with no major and damaging system failures.
>>
>>
File: because I am hard.jpg (355.5 KB)
355.5 KB JPG
>>16920982
I'm tired of waiting. I want to see two ships have sex already.
>>
File: 1237643.png (46.8 KB)
46.8 KB PNG
>>
>>
File: 1772129039973466.gif (353.8 KB)
353.8 KB GIF
>>16921005
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 2026-02-27-001045.png (58.7 KB)
58.7 KB PNG
>>16920968
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16921015
>>16920968
Hot staging was clearly the correct decision.
>>
File: file.jpg (1.3 MB)
1.3 MB JPG
https://x.com/jeff_foust/status/2027129265548874189
>From the earnings release: “Updated the Neutron development schedule following the stage 1 tank test failure, with Neutron’s first launch now targeted for Q4 2026.”
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 2026-02-27-001046.png (48.2 KB)
48.2 KB PNG
>>16921051
still coming as far as I know, its just that it takes quite a bit of time, there is a lot of paper work, the underwriting bank have to go to institutional investors to get them to invest in the pre-IPO slice (the main reason to do the IPO, i.e. to get funding from the public markets), lots of regulatory things
https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5LWNvcHk_9593a347-9f87-4e2c-a871-14f6212 77005
>>
>>
>>
>>16921063
because the point is for SpaceX to raise a lot of money like on the order of 50bil
maybe there was a way to do that with getting retail involved pre-IPO but that would create unnecessary risks and might not even be legally possible due to credited investor etc stuff
>>
File: 2026-02-27-001047.png (2.2 MB)
2.2 MB PNG
>>16921070
lol
>>
File: 2026-02-27-001048.png (60.5 KB)
60.5 KB PNG
>>16921056
>>
>>
File: 2026-02-27-001049.png (26.4 KB)
26.4 KB PNG
>>16921076
>>
File: 2026-02-27-001050.png (492.4 KB)
492.4 KB PNG
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2027189961548828708
>>
>>
File: 2026-02-27-001051.png (16.4 KB)
16.4 KB PNG
>>16921080
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2027216789927784559
>>
>>
>>
File: NHQ20260225_admin_0002~large.jpg (131 KB)
131 KB JPG
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: HCITVxtaEAAhIPK.jpg (158.5 KB)
158.5 KB JPG
https://x.com/KevZag/status/2027204048806629639
>Uh, what do you mean your composite QUALIFICATION article was a hand layup while your follow-on flight tanks were automated fiber placement...?
>>
>>
File: 1767216992209428.jpg (272.2 KB)
272.2 KB JPG
>Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Ted Cruz, R-Texas, announced Thursday he will convene a full committee executive session next week to vote on a two-year NASA reauthorization bill that would direct the agency to establish a permanent lunar base and preserve the International Space Station through at least 2032.
shits getting real
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16921102
bullshit excuse. they were caught in a lie, and panicked. watch the hand waving and "its almost ready" bullshit continue, quarter after quarter, year after year. this program is like the never ending dreamchaser scam.
just cancel it so the engineers and investors can move on with companies that favor results over rhetoric
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1742043257655255.jpg (188.3 KB)
188.3 KB JPG
>>16921075
>Peden
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16921112
>>16921115
Yeah his only MO is to use NASA as a jobs-maximizing agency; Gateway isn’t permanently manned so he doesn’t care, but a lunar base? Now mission control has more of a reason to stay online and keep more jobs in TX. Keep ISS alive twenty million more years? Same thing. Expect Cruz to be extra bullish on LEO projects in the upcoming future too
>>
>>
>>
>>16921102
>QUALIFICATION article
>“ummmm yeah we think the problem came from this funny little HAND-LAY process we had a THIRD PARTY CONTRACTOR do, bc the automated machine we need isn’t done yet, teehee!”
Are they actually fucking retarded?!
>>
File: 1000024929.jpg (360.4 KB)
360.4 KB JPG
>>16920983
What is this lump? I don't remember seeing it on previous versions
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16921258
its more like it will launch sometime around 4/20. it could launch before or after that date, but the launch is likely in mid-late april. its just that there is alot of testing that spacex needs to do ahead of the launch, and that testing will likely end in deep into april.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16921325
>>16921326
gateway bros i dont feel so good...
>>
>>
>>16921325
>>16921326
its the smart move. going from artemis 2 to a moon landing with a completely untested lander would be a nightmare
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1750530888049021.png (385.3 KB)
385.3 KB PNG
what's he thinking right now?
>>
File: 0 2026-02-27 160212.png (2 MB)
2 MB PNG
Administrator Jared Isaacman
Associate Administrator Amit Kshatriya
Lori Glaze, acting associate administrator for Exploration Systems Development Mission Directorate and Jareds holla back girl.
>>
>>
>>
>>
https://arstechnica.com/staff/2026/02/nasa-shakes-up-its-artemis-progr am-to-speed-up-lunar-return/
Berger article
>EUS and Block IB SLS cancelled
>possible Centaur V upper stage for AIV+
>Artemis III LEO mission, 2027
>Artemis IV landing, 2028
>annual missions
>possibly trending towards Gateway cut in favor of surface base
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: IMG_0170.jpg (344.6 KB)
344.6 KB JPG
>>16919285
Did we win?
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 0 2026-02-27 161232.png (1.3 MB)
1.3 MB PNG
"We apologize to the Emperor for our failure. Sumimasen."
>>
File: astronaut suicide.jpg (73.1 KB)
73.1 KB JPG
We're never going back to the moon, are we
>>
>>
>>
File: 2026-02-27-001053.png (334.2 KB)
334.2 KB PNG
https://x.com/dpoddolphinpro/status/2027400977469583526
this is retarded
>>
File: IMG_9921.jpg (153.9 KB)
153.9 KB JPG
>>16921355
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 0 2026-02-27 161137.png (1.1 MB)
1.1 MB PNG
"It's not NY fault! Landing on the Moon is really hard and I need more time to finish the project!"
>>
>>
>>
File: 1731523331683646.jpg (444 KB)
444 KB JPG
Fuck you.
>>
>>
Cancellation of the Exploration Upper Stage and Block IB upgrade for SLS rocket
Artemis II and Artemis III missions will use the SLS rocket with existing upper stage
Artemis IV, V (and any additional missions, should there be) will use a “standardized” upper stage
Artemis III will no longer land on the Moon; rather Orion will launch on SLS and dock with Starship and/or Blue Moon landers in low-Earth orbit
Artemis IV is now the first lunar landing mission
NASA will seek to fly Artemis missions annually, starting with Artemis III in “mid” 2027, followed by at least one lunar landing in 2028
NASA is working with SpaceX and Blue Origin to accelerate their development of commercial lunar landers for Artemis IV and beyond
We're boned.
>>
File: HLS_Starship_rendering.jpg (172.7 KB)
172.7 KB JPG
Good night, sweet prince.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
Oh and this has to pass Congress btw, so even if they want to go 120% on this current plan, that's at least a couple of months before they can even get started on it and of course the result of Artemis II will also heavily impact the final budget and plan. The idea that this new version of Artemis III can launch in 2027 is delusional to the extreme.
>>
>>
>>
Let's be very honest again, we don't have a commercially available heavy lift vehicle. Falcon 9 Heavy may someday come about. It's on the drawing board right now. SLS is real. You've seen it down at Michoud. We're building the core stage. We have all the engines done, ready to be put on the test stand at Stennis... I don't see any hardware for a Falcon 9 Heavy, except that he's going to take three Falcon 9s and put them together and that becomes the Heavy. It's not that easy in rocketry.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
Artemis III is now a LEO missions that will practice docking with a lander in mid-2027. Artemis IV will land on the Moon (10 months later) in early 2028. Artemis V will be in late 2028 (10 months later) and will also land on the Moon.
Ten month cadence on SLS. Guttsy call.
>>
>>
>>
>>16921393
If everything goes perfectly for China, they could actually launch in late 2028 or early 2029. Their 2030 timeline is them already accounting for any potential delays or unforeseen accidents. While the the LM-10 is still a year away from maiden flight, once the rocket is ready, they're planning for a very aggressive testing and launch schedule.
This is helped by the fact that the LM-10's YF-100K engines are already being used by the LM-12 and that the CZ-10 also shares common traits with the CZ-10A/CZ-10B, which will allow them to iron out some potential issues before the LM-10 even takes it's maiden flight and to scale up production a lot more aggressively.
>>
>we’re testing, we’re testing, we’re testing
Not delivering though so who gives a fuck
>our partners say they are on board, our partners support this
Yeah what the fuck else are they going to do? Say they can’t do it and pull out of mega contracts?
FUCK NASA
>>
>>16921409
Swapping out the ICPS for a Centaur V should give SLS a pretty significant performance boost. A big part of why SLS was still limited to NRHO with EUS was because it was supposed to be delivering Gateway modules and lander segments along with Orion.
Or it could be incrementally tiptoeing towards getting rid of SLS for a more capable vehicle. It's a lot easier to do these things one step at a time instead of all at once.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16921428
I feel like it has to at least wait until Artemis II is over before committing to such a massive change. If Artemis II is a shitshow, a lot of things have to change. Honestly, changing the plan now before Artemis II is a fucking stupid idea. Launch the damm rocket, and depending on how it does, digest the data and change the plan afterwards. Imagine getting congress to approve your new updated plan and spend billions on it and then Artemis II explodes on the launchpad weeks later.
>>
>>
>>
>>16921434
They’re gonna want something in return, perhaps the agreement was the get security of more SLS launches after Art3 (well, now Art4). Plus idk how the profits work but if NASA switched over to Centaur V that’s still technically Boeing-owned via ULA although admittedly that’s a bit different than a cushy EUS contract. I think despite the money, Boeing was getting nervous and must have known delivering EUS on-time was just never gonna happen
>>
>>16921431
so? the current change in plan will have basically no effect on how Artemis 2 goes
if it blows up that just shows that things should change even more
and if it goes okay, then the fact that it kept getting delayed and leaking etc is already showing things aren't going great
the status quo sucks already
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16921437
>if it blows up that just shows that things should change even more
That's the point. What's the point of changing the plan now, when you're likely gonna to have to change the plan again in a few months when Artemis II launches. Just consolidate all the changes and budget request into one package.
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 2026-02-27-001054.png (342.5 KB)
342.5 KB PNG
https://x.com/NASAAdmin/status/2027408590902841414
3min video
>>
>>
File: 2026-02-27-001055.png (2 MB)
2 MB PNG
>>16921448
>>
File: 2026-02-27-001056.png (2.5 MB)
2.5 MB PNG
>>
>>
>>
For the Artemis IV lunar landing mission, NASA also will need to human-rate a new upper stage for the SLS rocket. The vehicle currently uses a modified Delta IV upper stage manufactured by United Launch Alliance. But that rocket production line is closed, and NASA only has two more of these stages. With the cancellation of the Exploration Upper Stage, NASA will now procure a new stage commercially. NASA officials only said they will seek a “standardized” upper stage. As Ars has previously reported, the most likely replacement would be the Centaur V upper stage currently flying on Vulcan rockets.
Human "rated" Centaur.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>The goal is to reduce the turnaround time from one launch every 3 years, down to under a year between launches by 2027, and preferably to 10 months between launches by 2028.
Might as well also ask for a teleportation machine. Why the fuck are this fucking plans always have so unrealistic timelines. I know that it's not gonna happen, not by 2028, Jared knows that it's not gonna happen, everyone knows that it's not gonna happen. Setting this unrealistic goals just gets NASA laughed at when the timelines have to be delayed again and again.
Also, spending however many tens of billions to scale up SLS launches to once a year by 2032 is hilarious when it's also obvious that the SLS is on the chopping block. You're spending billions on a dead rocket, on the 0.1% chance that it can scale up fast enough to beat the chinese.
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 343242342.png (17 KB)
17 KB PNG
>>16921454
Who is this?
>>
>>16921468
Because canceling SLS is just simply not an option so the only other realistic thing is to say
>well, we’re going to order you to fly a shit ton of SLSs now
Jared knows he can tell Congress that he simply needs more money for ludicrous SLS launch costs, that will perhaps slowly go down from $4 bil a launch to maybe something a little more “tasteful” like $1.5 to 2 bil per launch, and Congress has an unlimited wallet keep that in mind. Because the alternative is telling congress that this simply isn’t getting done and that SLS isn’t flying after Arty4
>>
>>16921468
They want Apollo performance without Apollo bucks
They had multiple production lines and an actual army of people, like Starship
This all looks like they're going to launch Orion as a payload into LEO for Starship to dock with after fueling and haul to Lunar orbit
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: tipped landers.jpg (147.1 KB)
147.1 KB JPG
>>16921476
Looks like Intuitive Machine's lander from CLPS
>>
>>
>>
File: 1772210617966866.png (15.3 KB)
15.3 KB PNG
>>16921476
do you recognize it now?
>>
File: fallovertip.jpg (420.9 KB)
420.9 KB JPG
>>16921488
yes
>>
>>
>>
>>16921468
Like anything NASA did in the last few years, it's because of politics:
>Here's how we'll beat China to the moon
>Congress approves even if ot was impossible from the beginning
>Schedule slips
>Oh, hey Congress, you know we need more money to actually fulfill our mission
>Hopefully gets enough money to do something, holds jobs and international partners as hostages
>>16921481
Lmao
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
One likely reason for the insane idea of having the crew landing and two SLS launches in 2028, is that Trump is obsessed with being the president that got America back to the Moon. Maybe this is how Jared got another chance at NASA, he promised Trump that he could get American boots on the Moon before 2029.
>>
>>
>>
File: ohno.webm (2.2 MB)
2.2 MB WEBM
>>16921497
yeah if you wanna go 0.000001mph
>b-but if i make the sail 1000km wide
shut the fuck up
>>
File: 2026-02-27-001057.png (225.2 KB)
225.2 KB PNG
>>16921345
https://x.com/SciGuySpace/status/2027404173801591138
>>
>>16921495
This was something NASA was putting off for years
>ML2 construction fails, contractor literally embezzles billions
>New SRBs explode in testing
>EVA suits fail to materialize
>Service module from ESA is undersized and underpowered
>SLS can't even manage a launch every three years
>>
>>
File: HCLJU7AWcAArWrc.png (62.4 KB)
62.4 KB PNG
>>16921345
>>16921507
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 3432423.png (560.7 KB)
560.7 KB PNG
This is how the envision to bring humans back to the Moon.
>>
>>
File: 2026-02-27-001058.png (37.8 KB)
37.8 KB PNG
https://x.com/SciGuySpace/status/2027428918131618122
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: IMG_0171.jpg (844.7 KB)
844.7 KB JPG
>>16921527
Congress had their fun, but the important question is whether or not Congress *realizes* that these programs have unironically amounted to nothing, and promise nothing in the future, and that there needs to be a huge shift to commercial in the next 10 years unless the Moon is to be chinky china red
>>
>>
>>
File: 2026-02-27-001059.png (294.3 KB)
294.3 KB PNG
>>16921448
https://x.com/SpaceX/status/2027435344635773086
>SpaceX shares the same goal as NASA of returning to the Moon with a permanent presence as expeditiously and safely as possible. We look forward to working with NASA to fly missions that demonstrate valuable progress towards establishing a permanent, sustainable presence on the lunar surface. Frequent human exploration flights help establish a sustainable presence for humans in space.
>>
File: Capsulecucked.jpg (32.7 KB)
32.7 KB JPG
>>16921542
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: SN6 hop.webm (1.8 MB)
1.8 MB WEBM
It's been a long road
>>
>>
>>
File: 2026-02-27-001060.png (289.4 KB)
289.4 KB PNG
https://x.com/KenKirtland17/status/2027411426805940425
>>
>>
>>
>>16921555
>like almost zero (0) progress has been made since 2020 and the covid era
There's been zero progress made since Constellation was first conceived, Orion hasn't even flown crew yet and it was proposed 20 years ago.
>>
>>16921555
>>16921573
your definition of zero and progress is useless and therefore wrong.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: laughing mission control.jpg (32.8 KB)
32.8 KB JPG
>>16921583
nope, I will keep bullying muskrats with basic facts until your god emperor stops lying and finally does what he set out to do.
>>
>>16921584
Oh gotcha—so we have managed to make ground testing articles over the last 20 years, whereas fifty years ago Apollo was able to conjur flight-usable hardware from scratch over only a 4 year period.
We can basically land on the Moon tomorrow if we wanted to, right??
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16921587
you dont even understand what basic facts are. you're too stupid and poisoned with TDS. its rotted your mind.
>>16921589
doesn't need an excuse. you think it does because you also fit into the above description.
>>
File: 2026-02-27-001061.png (150.2 KB)
150.2 KB PNG
total gateway death
>>
File: HCLrSeWXsAAZTmU.jpg (293.4 KB)
293.4 KB JPG
https://x.com/FelixSchlang/status/2027441843600769439
>The chopstick simulators are being attached around V3 SN1 (Ship 39) currently, time for a squeeze test!
>>
File: 2026-02-27-001062.png (2 MB)
2 MB PNG
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhJRzQsLZGg
>>
File: rocket.lez.jpg (130.3 KB)
130.3 KB JPG
>>16921609
is this the same like when you start out with just a few gentle feels of a girl to see if she's ready for the heavier groping?
>>
>>16921538
It's not even about jobs. It's about getting contracts for companies in their districts that donate to their campaigns. These politicians don't give a fuck whether someone is employed or working a "good-paying" job LMAO
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16921624
the point is to test Orion docking and other systems safely
I guess it also makes it easier for SpaceX and BO (no need to get the landers to moon orbit, whatever that may be, so no need for a bunch of refueling launches)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 191119-spacex-starship-artist-rendering-ew-1204p.jpg (221.7 KB)
221.7 KB JPG
Interesting, this image appears to show a starship with a full heatshield in the lunar vicinity.
>>
>>
File: 1748788349977515.png (52.7 KB)
52.7 KB PNG
>>16921602
>TDS
what? lol you're so butthurt you can't even get your meme terms right
keep coping muskrat, you're an embarrassment and a funny one at that.
>>
The fact remains, would it not be simpler to use Starship V3, as is, for the entire lunar landing? If we just want speed, how is engineering an entire bespoke HLS Starship going to be faster? Sure you take a payload hit, but NASA wasn't even utilizing the full payload anyway in all their planning. It would essentially take the same amount of refuel flights, and you get less than 60% fuel margin (boohoo). and if the heatshield is truly Mars-return-capable, then it's Moon return capable
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16921644
yes, because it has no flaps, no heatshield, special landing thrusters. the current starship testing includes none of that. and changes that drastic are not going to be implemented and production-ready quickly. V3 at least already exists, youve seen it down at Boca Chica
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16921656
I’m not making excuses for their ass-sitting, I’m just pointing out that if you get v3 working all you have to do is take off the flaps on the upper stage and put some superdracos in or whatever. It’s minimal work. Finalizing SS that can actually go orbital is a majority of the work here; HLS is the final 5% push with little trinkets
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1766127807962613.jpg (1009.9 KB)
1009.9 KB JPG
MY FUCKING GOAT
YES YES YES
>>
>>16921679
not the absolute best, but something that is pretty good and fully reusable
instead of just getting something to orbit, the goal is to have a fully reusable rocket that has good payload
V3 will probably stay somewhat "frozen" for a while before bigger changes into v4 or whatever so they can actually start doing HLS and launching payloads
but doing that before you have a system that works as a reusable system would be somewhat pointless, they already have F9 to launch mass into orbit
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16921682
to expand on the point and make it even clearer
SpaceX could have made starship v2 in a way that the upper stage is expendable
but would that be cheaper than the current F9? I highly doubt it, not for a very long time in the very least
so it would be basically pointless from the POV of launching a bunch of starlinks (has to be cheaper than F9 or it doesn't make sense) or a permanent lunar presence
getting to orbit would have slowed down the development for no benefit when the goal is the get to a fully and rapidly reusable launch system that enables much cheaper cost of payload to orbit compared to their current already existing launch system (Falcon 9)
>>
>>
File: 2026-02-27-001063.png (25.4 KB)
25.4 KB PNG
https://x.com/spectatorindex/status/2027481097240777111
>>
>>
>>
File: starlink.jpg (306.5 KB)
306.5 KB JPG
I just ordered Starlink, frens. Hoping the latency and handoff jitter is not too bad or I might be stuck on 25Mbps fixed wireless for eternity.
>>
File: 2026-02-27-001064.png (68.3 KB)
68.3 KB PNG
>>16921726
https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5LWNvcHk_68a0019e-43cc-4168-8fd2-f4a8b81 d7309
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16921345
>https://arstechnica.com/staff/2026/02/nasa-shakes-up-its-artemis-prog ram-to-speed-up-lunar-return/
>Berger article
>EUS and Block IB SLS cancelled
>possible Centaur V upper stage for AIV+
>Artemis III LEO mission, 2027
>Artemis IV landing, 2028
>annual missions
>possibly trending towards Gateway cut in favor of surface base
>>16921741
>Mars is a shithole. Moon for the next ten years lol
This but unironically
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: whale sealab.jpg (71.4 KB)
71.4 KB JPG
>>16921757
Whales are intelligent.
>>
File: trump neat.png (723.2 KB)
723.2 KB PNG
>>16921760
>>
>>
File: maxresdefault.jpg (79.9 KB)
79.9 KB JPG
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQru-Ol7DWU
https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1oJMvRvAQwRxQ
Rocket Lab launching a suborbital hypersonic mission in T-5:00
>>
>>
File: Screenshot 2026-02-27 155236.png (500.8 KB)
500.8 KB PNG
mhmm mhmm mhmm
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: HCMjbBpWkAAb7gn.png (69.9 KB)
69.9 KB PNG
https://x.com/SciGuySpace/status/2027503513803108548
>I guess we know who successfully placed the anti-SpaceX provision in the Cruz reauthorization legislation for NASA.
>>
>>
File: Hoshi wtf.png (2.1 MB)
2.1 MB PNG
>>16921787
Does NASA have some clause where after you serve as administrator you have to go on to become a faggot?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16921801
it means they can start working on more stuff simultaneously
won't speed up when it becomes operational, but could very well speed up the ramp in cadence and speed up the factories etc needed for the payloads
>>
File: 2026-02-28-001065.png (172.6 KB)
172.6 KB PNG
>>16921787
https://x.com/SciGuySpace/status/2027512151405998173
>>
>>16921809
The future is Starship and New Glenn anyways. Those billions being thrown at shitty providers (who can’t deliver) would be better spent by giving it to SX and Blue and asking for deep-space capable vehicles for crew and cargo
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16921742
I honestly don't see what convinces people Mars is a better first target than the Moon. The only one I can understand is that it's a better place to not put all our eggs into one basket, but there's not a lot of Earth extinction events that also wipe out the Moon.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16921832
It is electron that can't compete with the F9, outside of the small sat payload market to unique orbits
>>16921830
Earth after an "extinction event" is still more inhabitable than mars..
>>
>>
>>
File: 1738946124869646.gif (3.3 MB)
3.3 MB GIF
>product can't compete
>oh except when it can
what an incredible argument.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16921787
I look forward to the accounting games NASA will play to avoid this
They'll probably do some ridiculous shit like awarding contracts before and after the fiscal year turnover, ghost missions like Veritas, and more
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16921838
That depends on the type of extinction event, but it's true most would still leave something in decent condition. It's why if something did wipe out civilization on Earth that would be a colonization target.
>>
File: Screenshot_1.jpg (132.9 KB)
132.9 KB JPG
>>16921867
Was probably meant to get the hypersonic ramjet vehicle on the correct trajectory.
>>
File: finally, some faith of the fucking heart.jpg (44.8 KB)
44.8 KB JPG
>>16921355
>or both
>>
>>16921830
The moon is an arid, airless, carbonless shithole
Mars has plenty of carbon and water, and a little bit of atmosphere which you can compress and use as a resource. The sand is normal sand, not jagged microparticles of glass that will fuck up everything.
>>
>>
>>
File: obamna.png (224.4 KB)
224.4 KB PNG
>>16921897
>erm if anything all Jared did was add another mission!
Stop acting like things are a-okay you half glass full fag
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: Twilight.jpg (1.8 MB)
1.8 MB JPG
>>16921917
You aren't missing anything desu just future pain and suffering
>>
>>
>>16921924
Is the top one from the episode where Archer gets space dementia and forgets everything at the end of each day, so T'Pol becomes his wife to look after him and they retire to some planet?
I've heard of this one but haven't seen it.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: sls contrators.jpg (7.5 KB)
7.5 KB JPG
>And then he said he wanted us to cut the SLS build time down from 3 years to 10 months
>>
File: Screenshot from 2026-02-28 14-41-06.png (122.9 KB)
122.9 KB PNG
Guys, stop spreading misinfo
EUS, Block 1b, Gateway are not cancelled, because only congress can cancel them. NASA would be literally breaking the law if it halts these programs.
>>
File: 1744087611983640.png (82.1 KB)
82.1 KB PNG
why the chinese bois salty tho
>>
>>
>>
File: endeavour engines.jpg (708.5 KB)
708.5 KB JPG
>>16921947
there are perfectly good RS25s collecting dust in some boring museum. I vote we rip them off so we can do apollo 9 take 2 sooner
>>
>>
File: donald using zettaflare.gif (549.5 KB)
549.5 KB GIF
>>16921924
>slightly-aged T'Pol
>>
>>16921952
AI Mode
All
Exact matches
Visual matches
About this image
Feedback
AI Overview
The provided text expresses a pessimistic view on the current state of a major international space initiative.
The text suggests that the Artemis program, once seen as a symbol of cooperation among developed nations, has failed or fallen apart ("become a mess").
It highlights a decline in global unity and the functional success of high-level international projects.
Translation
The Artemis program, which was once a symbol of unity among civilized nations, has thus become a complete mess.
Dive deeper in AI Mode
AI responses may include mistakes. Learn more
>>
File: 1757539626278868.png (2.1 MB)
2.1 MB PNG
this shit looks cursed
>>
>>
>>16921956
SOVL
>>16920583
sovlless
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: GATEWAY_(Moon_Space_Station).jpg (1.3 MB)
1.3 MB JPG
Can't help but notice Gateway wasn't mentioned at all, and isn't even in the new renders.
It's over... (good)
>>
>>
>>
File: SLS fans 2026-02-28 18-08-53.png (102.2 KB)
102.2 KB PNG
>>16921979
Why are these people so fixated on this expendable piece of shit?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: HCO2MncWgAAioQN.jpg (722 KB)
722 KB JPG
foggy
>>
>>
>>16921990
On this page and maybe some more elsewhere
>>16921454
>>
>>
>>16922033
>>16922034
Thanks
>>
>>
>>
File: Screenshot 2026-02-28 130039.png (64.3 KB)
64.3 KB PNG
How many times have EUS and 1b been cancelled?
>>
File: 1538795760498.png (267.9 KB)
267.9 KB PNG
>>16922081
>>16921944
>>16921345
All this has happened before, and it will happen again.
"Cancellation" means nothing if Congress just write it into the next authorization or budget bill. And they have and will again.
What they actually need to do is expend some political capital and halt this absurd struggle. End the zombie programs.
Pretending this time it will actually stick is just naive.
They need to win the argument in both houses to stop it, which wouldn't be difficult if the party in control of all three branches gave a shit about space.
>>
>>16922081
>>16922082
I remember during the DOGE cuts, they just directed the EUS engineers to work on it quietly. Clearly Congress will pull out all the stops to protect this rocket.
>>
File: EUS EDS.png (259.5 KB)
259.5 KB PNG
*titanic violins playing in the background*
>>
>>
File: 1737548953958105.jpg (20.5 KB)
20.5 KB JPG
>>16922097
>>
>>
>>
File: 1729170388647286.jpg (707.4 KB)
707.4 KB JPG
>>16922105
it was a fucking antenna retard. We are not derailing the thread into polshit over this.
Cope.
>>
>>
>>
>>
They won't cancel the most energetic rocket ever. And they also can't - it's the law this rocket is built.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: EFT-1.jpg (82.7 KB)
82.7 KB JPG
>>16922140
I am the enemy
>>
>>
File: 2026-02-28-001071.png (29.6 KB)
29.6 KB PNG
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2027632111264612715
>>
File: SLS contractors2.webm (2.7 MB)
2.7 MB WEBM
>>16922140
>>
>>
File: 1749754619533939.webm (3.1 MB)
3.1 MB WEBM
>>
File: 1630436145529.jpg (130.1 KB)
130.1 KB JPG
>>16922140
based
>>
>>
>>
>>16921969
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bVNTNeNMH8Q
You think you can hop better than the best? You'd trip a hundred times going anywhere.
>>
>>
File: HCQi1CbXQAAZeqq.jpg (88 KB)
88 KB JPG
>>16922148
exoatmospheric interception kino is back on the menu
>>
File: Spaceguy5 SLS.png (48.5 KB)
48.5 KB PNG
>>16922140
Yes you literally are
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16922074
Yesterday when Isaacman said they were standardizing SLS to not have custom upper stages and then put out graphics showing SLS using a Centaur V.
see >>16921454
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16922199
don't pretend to be retarded
>>16922200
Correct anon, Isaacman said they were >not< going to use custom upper stages.
>>
>>
>>
File: 4194.png (1.4 MB)
1.4 MB PNG
>>16922179
Yi Long Ma cannot be allowed to launch American astronauts to the Luna
>>
>>
File: uyguyg.jpg (106.1 KB)
106.1 KB JPG
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8VwRdui50FY
>NASA chief Jared Isaacman discusses major changes to Artemis program to get it "back on track"
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16922277
It shouldn't and it makes more sense to offload it to Vulcan or New Glenn but whatver, I think using SLS keeps Congress le happy and it somehow leads to Jared's goal of launching SLS more often. I think Jared naively thinks they can and should get Space Launch System Block 1.1 (or whatver it will be called) to shuttle-tier launch cadence where they are launching once every three or four months. Obviously this should not and is not going to happen, but a man with big ears can have big dreams
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: JOORVJXOCJAHVCGIIDAO2V5C3E.jpg.jpg (129.4 KB)
129.4 KB JPG
meanwhile, spektreworks is slapping starlink(starshield?) mini dishes on their shahed clones.
is starshield literally just starlink but only for DOD?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: HCRS9dnbEAQPvEA.jpg (2.4 MB)
2.4 MB JPG
>>
File: kairos.png (176.4 KB)
176.4 KB PNG
>>16922338
falcon-1-itus
>>
>>16922338
if it's not listed in https://spaceflightnow.com/launch-schedule/ how the fuck was I supposed to know about it
>>
>>16922343
By using the superior site
https://nextspaceflight.com/
>>
File: file.png (548.3 KB)
548.3 KB PNG
>>16922343
>>
>>
Grok?
Human-rated launch vehicles are certified rockets designed with enhanced safety, redundancy, and reliability to transport humans into space. Key operational systems include SpaceX’s Falcon 9 (Crew Dragon), while upcoming systems include NASA’s SLS (Orion), Boeing’s Starliner, and India’s Human-Rated LVM3 (HRLV). These vehicles feature abort systems and stringent structural requirements
India human rated. FH isn't. Neither is Starship.
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: Ham_the_chimp_(cropped).jpg (149.4 KB)
149.4 KB JPG
I think NASA needs to get back to the basics in launching monkeys for test flights of crew hardware
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: maxresdefault.jpg (228.6 KB)
228.6 KB JPG
>>16922338
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pfexN0a5mAo
>Live: KAIROS Flight 3 Launch (No Commentary)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VxG5A5D5638
>{Kairos] Space One Kairos 3 launch live commentary
>T-55:00
Hold on, I just got back from work
>>
File: 2574.jpg (68.2 KB)
68.2 KB JPG
>>16922333
If a human were to sit atop of a Falcon Heavy right now it would kill them instantly. That's the Musk personal touch.
>>
>>
No Active Certification: SpaceX has not pursued human-rating certification for Falcon Heavy.
Focus on Starship: SpaceX shifted focus to Starship, making the costly redesign or qualification of Falcon Heavy for humans unnecessary.
Starslip will be the death of SpaceX.
>>
>>
File: japanese consternation.png (324 KB)
324 KB PNG
https://x.com/Kairos_SPACEONE/status/2027921403966902525
>Pre-launch Information for Kairos No. 3: Kairos No. 3 was scheduled for launch on March 1, 2026, at 11:00:00, but based on the results of weather analysis, today's launch has been canceled. The new launch schedule will be announced as soon as it is determined.
>>
>>
>>
https://x.com/NASAAdmin/status/2027928360341672076
>>
File: chucklebike.jpg (19.2 KB)
19.2 KB JPG
>>16921956
Chuckle brother looking ahh rover.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>16922337
>>16922353
I wonder what the latencies are for those in military, if they hit sub 10 ms latency because infinite frequency allocation allows infinite number of bandwidth space
>>
>>
>>16922814
nah, there's a hard physics latency and compute latency, thats probably ~10ms or so, and then there's scheduling distribution that affects majority of the latency people see as their packets are distributed, delayed, smoothed out over time period so as to not cause congestion.
Its called TDMA
>>
>>16922822
and I bet internally spacex has multiple options to change the scheduling of the packets as well for various tasks, some can be first come first serve for the lowest possible latency, others can be buffered out for smoothness and compute efficiency