Thread #34299562
HomeIndexCatalogAll ThreadsNew ThreadReply
H
I came to the conclusion, that women hate good, intelligent, emotionally mature and open, empathic men the same way they hate short, ugly men.
I think it comes down to the fact that they see these men as litmus test for themselves that they know they wouldn't pass.
Also, men with higher intelligence are impossible to be used so these women avoid them.

They would rather go for a dumb, high masculinity, low inhibition, high aggressiveness men even if they looks like neanderthals. These seem to be popular with women here in Poland.
Women simply didn't develop beyond their primal urges and it's especially noticible today where they can have a free choice of the litter.

So my question is - since it;s a adv board - are there any countries left where women value good, intelligent men? If so, where is that?
+Showing all 47 replies.
>>
>>34299562
That is a factor, but if you use your intelligence to gain social status then it's no longer a problem.
>>
>litmus test for themselves that they know they wouldn't pass
so like, you with women basically
>>
>>34299563
I was thinking of adding that part, that sure, later on when they want to settle (double digit body number, 3 kids etc) they MAY want a guy like that only to use him anyways.
I mean look at Musk or Bezos - do you think they TRULY found women who actually want THEM?

>>34299567
I hope you die, femmorhoid.
>>
>>34299563
To continue, if I made a shit ton of money, I would use it to do a research of where the last few good women live and move there. Although, that is probably the only good way even for the average guy today.
>>
>>34299562
Women naturally prefer strong men exclusively, yes. How they interpret that (omg he's so tall/rich/violent) is entirely their problem. No there aren't countries with an actual exception to this rule. Those of us who are condemned by God to be weak just have to make peace with solitude.
>>
they prefer a dumb man, easier to steer
handsome retards are usually dumber too, since they have to use their wits alot less, especially when its about women
they also prefer excitement, mystery, entertainment, "good" men are usually "boring"

their primal urge would be to be with someone who is ideal for raising children, dumb and unpredicable males are the opposite of that, so what they are doing is listening to their little selfish needs that require entertainment
>>
>>34299574
>No there aren't countries with an actual exception to this rule.
I beg to differ, maybe it's my neverending optimism or something.
The very few instances where I had experiences with women from Asia or Africa, it was night and day with what Polish women were like to me.
They were much nicer and DID give me signs of appreciation, even if not in a romantic meaning. But I think it can be done.
That would make sense - it's the freedom of modern western women which made them animalistic like that.
Women in poorer countries know they depend on men, so they seek the stable, good ones more so than the emotional/dopamine craze like western women do.
Also, good and intelligent =/= weak, although yes, I know what you mean. And that pic rel made me kek so thanks anon.
>>
>>34299570
>femmorhoid
heard that one a lot, got anything a bit more original? or are you completely braindead you fag
>>
File: unnamed.jpg (50 KB)
50 KB
50 KB JPG
>>34299562
Thanks for the laughs.
Women had a deep perception, honed by millenia of evolution to detect real intelligence from the apperence of it.
Real intelligence is what make people learn fast and survive in the jungle, predating lesser beings and submiting their peers into collaboration.
In the sex evolutive war, men try to hack the female brain faking it, while women improve their discerning skills. It's even possible that languaje appeared just for male sapiens to show wit.
Probably your shows of "intelligence" in front of the ladies are pathetic in their eyes.
See, having a very expensive car shows, in fact, intelligence. Even if the owner never attended a school.
>>
>>34299582
>their primal urge would be to be with someone who is ideal for raising children
I think I explained it well in the next post anon >>
>>34299583
I think it's the other way around. They are being taken care of by the daddy govt (funded by men) so they actually don't need a stable man.
They can go for what they crave internally in their animalistic core, as you said
>so what they are doing is listening to their little selfish needs that require entertainment
That's what their choices are like that. They literally reverted to caveman days.

>>34299587
You clearly have no idea what "intelligence" really means.
>>
>>34299570
>I was thinking of adding that part, that sure, later on when they want to settle (double digit body number, 3 kids etc) they MAY want a guy like that only to use him anyways.
>I mean look at Musk or Bezos - do you think they TRULY found women who actually want THEM?
No one truly wants anyone. If you see a hot woman, you want her body and the feelings of love are dependent on her staying in shape.
If a woman sees a hot guy, she wants his body, his money, or his status. It's actually better for men because they have multiple options beyond looks.
>>
>>34299587
>Real intelligence is what make people learn fast and survive in the jungle, predating lesser beings and submiting their peers into collaboration.
What you are talking about is EQ, which is not what a real intelligence is.
Purely intelligent man will ignore status quo when it's wrong, will be ahead of most people in seeing patterns (covid vax, epstein case), basically he's going to be the antithesis of an NPC in all/majority of regards. Also he will score high on Mensa IQ test.
What you are talking about is a HANDY man, not intelligent one. Stop changing definitions of words so they fit your narrative.

>>34299595
Yeah but the guy will want 70% of women, and another will want 80% of women.
>It's actually better for men because they have multiple options beyond looks.
Illusion of options. They will want an exceptional man in any regard of "options" you are talking about.
Literally no one nowadays except for boomers maybe says "try harder", not even redpillers don't do that anymore. Everybody knows it's in vain and the goalpost moves all the time.
>>
>>34299591
>You clearly have no idea what "intelligence" really means.
Then please explain what it is to you.
I can tell you that natural born intelligence (the only that women can find useful to seek) is not linked to education, and humans had been lowering their intelligence since neolithic times due to civilization making life easier.
My point is what women appreciate is practical intelligence that make individuals more efficient in their adaptation to the environment.
>>
>These seem to be popular with women here in Poland.
Granted. I've never seen Poland.

>>34299587
That sounds sexist
>>
>>34299597
>Yeah but the guy will want 70% of women, and another will want 80% of women.
So they have lower standards and are willing to have sex with anything. Does that imply moral superiority?
>Illusion of options. They will want an exceptional man in any regard of "options" you are talking about.
>Literally no one nowadays except for boomers maybe says "try harder", not even redpillers don't do that anymore. Everybody knows it's in vain and the goalpost moves all the time.
You say that, but the majority of men have had sex. Incels are still less than half of men.
>>
>>34299597
>which is not what a real intelligence is.
Yeah and your dick is actually bigger when measured by total fluid volume displacement instead of inches
>>
>>34299600
I never said it's linked to education. On the contrary, I don't think that. I explained it already here >>34299597

>>34299604
>So they have lower standards and are willing to have sex with anything. Does that imply moral superiority?
Where did I imply moral superiority. I just pointed out flaws in your thinking, that it's stupid to compare the difficulty of a man vs a woman in terms of finding a partner.
Also it deviated too much from the main topic now.

>You say that, but the majority of men have had sex. Incels are still less than half of men.
One can be incel and non-virgin. What you just typed doesn't negate what I said.
>>
>>34299562
If your 'intellect' is just reciting book facts and complaining/agreeing about Trump or Poland, you aren't smart, you’re a bore.

Women don't hate 'intelligence'; they hate the lack of nuance. Real intelligence is having your life together: a career, health, a clean living space, and hobbies that aren't just consuming product. If you’re a fat lummox who thinks being 'nice' replaces basic hygiene and social calibration, that's your problem.

Stop being a pervert and go touch grass
>>
>>34299618
>Where did I imply moral superiority. I just pointed out flaws in your thinking, that it's stupid to compare the difficulty of a man vs a woman in terms of finding a partner.
Probably the part where you defined a "good" woman.
>One can be incel and non-virgin. What you just typed doesn't negate what I said.
"Wanting an exceptional man" is a bit at odds with the fact that more than half of men were selected by women. It's not possible for >50% to be exceptional.
>>
>>34299622
AI wrote this post. Even thought parts of it are true, it clearly lacks soul. Also it defends women and denies reality, especially this part:

>Women don't hate 'intelligence'; they hate the lack of nuance.
>>
>>34299624
>"Wanting an exceptional man" is a bit at odds with the fact that more than half of men were selected by women. It's not possible for >50% to be exceptional.
Slightly above 50% doesn't sound so good. Also, I was talking about the leftover, single women, who have these standards mostly.
The fact that you are denying crazy female standards and the rise of singleness nowadays, also the hoeflation, proves you are a retarded NPC.
>>
>>34299624
>>34299633
Plus, yeah, those who didn't get the exceptional men, they went for the low IQ ones that they know they can use easily. As I said in OP.
>>
>>34299633
>Slightly above 50% doesn't sound so good. Also, I was talking about the leftover, single women, who have these standards mostly.
Have you heard of supply and demand?
>The fact that you are denying crazy female standards and the rise of singleness nowadays, also the hoeflation, proves you are a retarded NPC.
Or maybe I am selected because I worked instead of whining.
>>
File: images.jpg (5.7 KB)
5.7 KB
5.7 KB JPG
>>34299640
>Or maybe I am selected because I worked instead of whining.
Shut the fuck up, you didn't do shit.
>>
>>34299643
Have you ever heard of the crab mentality?
>>
>>34299562
You came to the wrong conclusion. Women enjoy good men, and they enjoy intelligent men and they enjoy empathic, open men. They love men like this and pray to find one fervently for themselves.

The problem is that many men today, around 81% of all men, are bitch-made. Which means yes many men out there are those things, they lack the one thing that holds it all together, a fucking spine.

Women want the man to have these nice and warm cuddly qualities but not at the cost of the man being an overly agreeable neurotic doormat. And 81% of so called "good men" are people pleasers, ass kissers, they don't just give the nice guy service to the woman, he gives it to everyone, absolutely everyone, even to people who disrespect him. Even to people who disrespect his woman. And it's men like that they hate. And other men should hate them too.
I've seen weak spineless men like this in action too. They will be in a group setting, and someone or multiple people will talk shit about the guy's girlfriend or wife and disrespect her, disrespect the guy himself, and the guy just nods and awkwardly smiles "haha good one guys!" and does absolutely nothing. Doesn't even cut them out of his life, continues to kiss ass. Men like this will always be revolting.
>>
>>34299562
My problem with intelligent men is that they're generally unhappy.
I'd rather be with a guy who's having a good time than a guy who'd rather tell me 6 different reasons why what we're doing is stupid.
>>
>>34299751
>They love men like this and pray to find one fervently for themselves.
That would make me the most desireable man in the world right now but it's the furthest from the truth.
So I'll stick to my conclusions, thank you.

Also even >>34299752 A FEMALE agrees with me.

>>34299752
But you know, a man can be intelligent, but also have the happy go lucky personality. Sure, his outlook on society may be gloomy and dark, but that's because things ARE shit.
He will still try and keep a smile in his daily life, he's not going to be an emo 24/7. SO just admit you simply like lies and you live by them.
>>
>>34299562
You are retarded. Kindness is actually the #1 most important trait for relationships, and intelligence is very attractive in itself.

The problem is that women aren't attracted to out of shape, poorly dressed, boring, broke, emotionally unstable, socially inept autistic dorks who think they're smarter than they actually are, show no masculine backbone or assertiveness or competence, who expect women to approach them and split the bill 50/50, and who "are nice" only in the most shallow, performative, transactional way, and think they're owed sex for it.

Be a more attractive, well-rounded person, stop using dating apps (ever), and stop caring about what "the average woman" does or likes (by your warped incorrect estimation). You only need 1 good woman, and that's not easy to find anywhere, but also not impossible.

>are there any countries left where women value good, intelligent men? If so, where is that?
Literally every single place where people live. God, you people are pathetic.
>>
>>34300837
>That would make me the most desireable man in the world right now but it's the furthest from the truth
Yeah there's a reason it's far from the truth, it's because what you estimate of yourself is not true. And that's okay, because everyone has an inner prick or asshole in him, every man has a dog in him. What separates the men from the fucking pinnochios is one is honest about it, and is therefore in control of it. The other is dishonest about it, lying even to himself and is therefore not in control of it.

You're acting like a nice guy, not a kind guy. Nice guys are pieces of shit that nobody likes, not even the nice guy himself. Because nice guys, their good deeds have strings attached, their gestures of niceness are never free. They're emotional debts, and the issue these debts to people who don't even ask for it. It's intrusive as fuck and desperate and not nice in actuality, it's controlling and overbearing horse shit.

Kind men are kind because they want to be kind, full stop. No expectation if return, no ulterior notice, just an abundance of feeling positive and having some to spare and giving it to someone who needs it and that's all. They are even kind to people who don't even deserve it, because they understand those are the people who need it most. It actually inspires others to help themselves up.

Nice guys would never do that in a million years, giving freely to someone who they dislike. That would require not being able egotistical Trainwreck. And nice guys are always that every time
>>
Women love good and intelligent men. Your problem is that you are neither.
>>
>>34299562
Bwahagaga

It's always them. Never stop coping
>>
>>34299562
>women hate good, intelligent, emotionally mature and open, empathic men
Do you see yourself as being those things?
>>
>>34299562
They don't, in fact they love them, you just don't fit the description.
>>
>>34303358
>>34303427
All lies.
>>34299562
You are 100% right. Female creatures dislike intelligent men because they can't be manipulated and also because they can relate to the dumb brutes more since foids are dumb themselves. Females have smaller brains, so being forced to think about anything else than their shallow feelings is too much for them.
>>
>>34299562
No. Asians pretend to to get your money.
Also, you're not intelligent.
I'm not saying that to shame you into thinking you're wrong. You're right. It just took you too long to realize it.
>>
File: Europa.jpg (314.2 KB)
314.2 KB
314.2 KB JPG
>>34299562
Men are checking out of society at an alarming rate.
>>
>>34303456
Maybe start using your intelligence for things like manipulation and love magic. You're not that intelligent after all if you can't get a woman to like you.
>>
>>34299587
>Women have a deep perception
Women's intuition is a meme you dumb whore
>>
>>34303456
If smaller brains is bad then aren’t women selecting for intelligence by choosing larger/taller men?
>>
>>34302484
Fuck off you clueless simp
>>
>>34303473
Are you retarded or just pretending to be retarded to be retarded?
>>
>Modern man. Picrel.
That skull shape. They don’t even make them like that anymore. Dude has an occipital, compared to she smoothebrains that pass for humans these days.
>>
>>34303576
You should think about the quality of your post before you post stuff like this
>>
>>34303686
Cute.
>>
>>34303661
>actually replying to that
You nigger
>>
>>34303456
>that guy is handsome and rich but ewwwwww he's smart
Find just one instance of a woman saying this. If you can't, that's admitting you are a low IQ virgin.

Reply to Thread #34299562


Supported: JPG, PNG, GIF, WebP, WebM, MP4, MP3 (max 4MB)