Nope.
>t. Also speak 4+1 languages

>>34303690
You don't view yourself as smart? Why? Does it not take a high IQ to be able to learn those languages?

>>34303698
You can be stupid in five languages. Just because you know how to speak doesn't mean you actually know anything about life itself.

>>34303698
It's a stupid thing to view yourself as a smart person for two reasons:
1. it opens up a vulnerability for others to challenge you and your aforementioned intelligence
2. makes you unlikeable and unrelateable.
It's probably smarter and wiser to not factor this into anything. Natural talent develops naturally.

>>34303715
>>34303719
I see. Alright. This makes sense!

>>34303719
>to view yourself as a smart person
Now what if someone else thinks you're smart because you know so many languages?

>>34303737
That's on them. Leave it at that.
Just thank this person's compliment and move on

>>34303739
Alright

>>34303674
That depends if you are smart on top of knowing 5 languages.
It was common for slaves in the old era to speak many languages as they were used as translators.

>>34303674
I don't think so. Your income is a better measure of IQ.

>>34303674
kids working in tourist places know a lot of languages too you need to be smarter than that

>>34303919
So I would be smart if I was a professional footballer making millions each season?

>>34303674
Yes, but no guarantee of success just frlm that. AI makes your skill less valuable.
>>34303919
If you're so smart why are you dead, mr scott adams

>>34304154
>mr scott adams
Who?

>>34303674
It's a skill, at the very least.

>>34304359
Yep, just like sucking a golf ball through a garden hose.