Thread #34304128
File: 1751743422006672.png (48.9 KB)
48.9 KB PNG
If you asked for something and the langauge was
>Written statement Identifying -legal authority 'under' which it was destroyed
Would this not be an 2 sided request? And wouldn't the only answer be like a yes or no answer?
>Law is stated on record -legal authority under which (if or if not)
Kind of like a pastor marries and says -the legal authority invested in me- I now pronounce etc.
the only way to answer meaningfully is with a l yes or no answer
Correct?
5 RepliesView Thread
Showing all 5 replies.>>
>>
>>34304155
oh i know comprehension isn't a requirement to be in government in america. yes
If i said if no longer in your possession or destroyed, provide a written statement identifying- the legal authority under which it was destroyed.
Does it put a fire under their ass having to confirm if yes or no, the record requested was destroyed lawfully?
>idk maybe someone who can show me they operate within something can see this
>>
>>34304180
Not the English law student but I think I understand you, maybe.
You're trying to get some document from somebody and they're saying they don't have it. And you want them to provide a legal explanation of why they don't.
Is that essentially it? (It really is NOT clear). If I'm close, then your second version is better.
>>
>>
>>34304128
Your statements are ill formed, no one understands your words, and you are ESL so legal wording in a foreign language is beyond you.
Consult a lawyer in the correct feild and pay them money to do the work.