File: IMG_5697.png (426.0 KB)
luddites are trannies edition
>Educational sites:
https://www.investopedia.com
>Financial TV Streams:
https://www.newslive.com/american/cnbc.html
https://www.livestreamy.net/bloomberg/
>Charts:
https://www.tradingview.com
https://www.finscreener.com
https://www.portfoliovisualizer.com
>Screeners:
https://finviz.com/
https://etfdb.com/
>Gambling:
https://www.optionsplaybook.com/options-introduction/
https://www.optionsprofitcalculator.com
https://optionstrat.com/
https://www.optionistics.com/quotes/option-prices
>Pre-Market and Live data:
https://www.investing.com/indices/indices-futures
https://finance.yahoo.com/
>Calendars:
https://www.marketwatch.com/economy-politics/calendar
https://www.earningswhispers.com/calendar
https://www.cmegroup.com/trading/interest-rates/countdown-to-fomc.html
https://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/data/building-permits
>Boomer Investing 101:
https://www.bogleheads.org/wiki/Getting_started
https://www.sec.gov/search-filings
>Misc:
https://www.financialjuice.com/home
https://finance.yahoo.com/trending-tickers
https://market24hclock.com/
https://HindiPoopMusic.com
https://brokerchooser.com
https://www.chathamfinancial.com/technology/us-market-rates
>Previous
>>62327351
Showing all 326 replies.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>62327835
>Well I mean we were on the highest recorded buffet indicator with insanely shaky fundamentals. Now the question is how deep this dip goes.
We need to dip at least 50% for valuations to start making sense again, but that's not going to happen anytime soon because there are endless hordes of people out there who will take a second mortgage out on their home to buy the dip if we go down by so much as 20%. I want to believe this shitty AI bubble will pop soon, but I just don't see it happening as long as retail idiots have money.
>>
>>62328569
>LAC because I think that battery technology is going to keep evolving
Oh i agree but there are always issues with that like sodium batteries weighing alot. There are areas that Li might need to look out for, I've been noticing that for low end applications Ni-MH batteries are getting pretty good. Small lights and low power rechargeable appliances like hair clippers and that sort of thing.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 2738661263.jpg (535.5 KB)
>>62328550
Let the nacos deal in the real world.
>>
>>
>>
>>62328598
Buddy got lucky with KO and Apple and has been riding high ever since.
>>62328615
Calm before the storm
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 4288762387.jpg (77.9 KB)
>>62328626
I've made my own in a pinch when I needed just one or two, and I'm sure they were good, but I can't be assed to make a dozen of them one at a time when I'm just trying to get a bunch of burritos put together, ese.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1711572557490862.jpg (1.3 MB)
>>62328584
left was told to hate ai, so they hate ai.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1766155128079141.mp4 (4.0 MB)
>>62328746
I will do as I please, fuck the trannies
>>
File: Earnings.png (70.4 KB)
New AI earnings just dropped
EXTREMELY BULLISH
https://andrewbaker.ninja/2026/05/23/is-ai-profitable-the-1-4-trillion -scorecard-nobody-wants-to-talk-abo ut/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>62328768
BTW they don't show CAPEX on the balance sheets so it will only show revenue, and the writedowns for all the equipment have not been disclosed since there is no clear "half life" for all those sever racks
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>62328796
Art is judged by effort. Simple.
To say otherwise would be to doubt the subjective opinion of the majority of the human race. They could even be objectively wrong, but their minds wont change on this view.
>>
File: freeguac.jpg (207.7 KB)
>>62328627
just for burritos babe, that's all they're good for.
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1729875748591544.jpg (75.7 KB)
>>62328689
Where my ORCLs at?
If ORCL tanks, I think that it's a pretty clear sign that we'll be in a bear market for a while.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>62328806
A whole 1000 dollars!
I'm planning on depositing at least 1k a month until I manage to find an apartment, which will then cause that amount to be lowered substantially depending on whether my rent will be half income (which is very likely).
>>62328813
>Is that all you care about?
In a world based around money? It's what most people are concerned with, yes.
>You can make profit
A few cents of profit is profit as well. Is that worth throwing your weekends away and risking burnout?
None of what I said applies to art that is made for fun. But if you expect your art to be profitable just because you invested effort into it, you're an idiot.
>>
>>
>>
>>62328807
Just because something is popular doesn't mean it's good. I don't get these questions about art, it seems obvious and intuitive that the effort put into a piece of art does effect its quality and what it represents. A sculpture done by hands over a month or two by a person who learned from school or under some teacher how to sculpt over several years will be more valuable than one done in 30 seconds by a machine, a person (usually) can appreciate the effort somebody else needed to go through to make something. We are getting something of the artist in the art they produce and I think that's an integral part of the experience. I mean don't you ask yourself why someone did something or made something in the first place?
>>
>>
File: images.jpg (9.4 KB)
>>62328756
You better calm that shit down and come right here and me some fuckin' respect before me and my Jewish niggas come up here and beat yo ass, nigga. Off top.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>62328824
Listen, the charts tell me we are at the very top and right now its the worst time to buy.
The news tell me we are early as fuck and you should buy and slurp and suck as much as you can
Both are equally plausible.
If you believe the first option, buy VOO or QQQM. If you like risk buy SQQQ
If you believe the second option, buy TQQQ
>>
File: utilitarians-vs-deontologists-v0-88l5xe67b91g1.jpg (60.8 KB)
>>62328834
Problem is if you cant measure it, it is worthless. You dont like money as a metric, thats fair. You have to give me somthing else though besides a post modernist qualityais decided by my tastes and the tastes of people like me becuase we are smart bullshit. Thats not an argument in anything but delusion.
>>
>>62328830
Thank you for your heartfelt advice. I shall proceed to pull myself up by my bootstraps and start working 80 hours a week while also learning every practical craft there is.
>>62328834
>Just because something is popular doesn't mean it's good.
The term "good" is meaningless in this context, as it refers to too many things.
However, we as a society have decided that things that are high in monetary value are better than things with low monetary value.
>it seems obvious and intuitive that the effort put into a piece of art does effect its quality and what it represents.
Ah, but what it represents is different for everyone. "The Death of the Author" still holds up to this day.
>A sculpture done by hands over a month or two by a person who learned from school or under some teacher how to sculpt over several years will be more valuable than one done in 30 seconds by a machine
If this were the case, then artists wouldn't have to worry about losing their livelihoods. Alas, the reality is different.
Normalfags would rather have quick and cheap than slow and expensive. We've seen this before, we're seeing this now and we will be seeing this in the far future.
>We are getting something of the artist in the art they produce and I think that's an integral part of the experience.
If anything, this is where your problem lies. You think your perspective supersedes the perspectives of others.
I personally couldn't care less how many times the author of a doujin masturbated to vintage porn VHS tapes until he got the breasts on page 4 just right.
>>
>>
File: rat grab thumbs up.jpg (14.8 KB)
>>62328860
Thanks for the advice! I will definitely look into those options.
May I ask for the reasoning behind them? If it's too much a bother you are more than welcome to tell me to fuck off.
>>
File: 1755029245169962.png (1.8 MB)
>>62328860
>buy TQQQ
Do it faggots!
>>
>>62328834
>>62328867
I feel like these questions were already answered when we entered the industrial age.
>>
File: newperspective.jpg (241.8 KB)
people still say generated art was done by a machine, but a human prompted it, and that prompt is a reflection of their soul just as much as art created by "hand." and i use the quotes for hand because nobody paints on cave walls with their fingers anymore, artists always adapt to the best tools of the age.
>>
>>62328881
QQQM and VOO are long term holds that are pretty much bulletproof, you can hold them through "uncertain times" and come out in the green
SQQQ is an ETF thats shorting the market said market being the nasdaq-100 it has a 3x short but betting against the market is always risky
TQQQ is another leveraged ETF but with a 3x long on the market, less risky because betting on line go up is safer, if you believe the news you want to be in on this
>>
>>
>>62328860
Truth. Is there a VOOM, never thought of that as a better cash option when feeling bearish. Brilliant, though Im still curios if VOO is less volatile than QQQ even with the options selling.
>>62328881
SQQQ ultimate bear money maker but stupid and dangerous as hell. VOO is better than holding cash as it really could bounce so why risk missing out. Getting fucked with VOO is not somthing to fear. QQQM might even be better than VOO. It sells options so you miss out on the upside but get profits protecting and slowing a dip, perfect if bearish. TQQQ is SQQQ in reverse, money printer in the good times, see March of 2020.
>>
>>
File: Screenshot_20260606-113031_TradingView.jpg (117.4 KB)
>>62328905
>>
>>
>>62328905
If you DCA who gives a fuck, and if you are retired like me you just leverage with the RSIs. Losing 54% in 2007 just to go into TQQQ in 2010 is what I masturbate to.
Plus your chart never takes into account dividends which isn't huge but does soften it.
>>
File: 15391730173926.mp4 (31.0 KB)
>>62328690
>>62328693
Oracle and Abode will crush any optimism left in the market
>>
>>
>>62328911
Yea fuck that Anon for having somthing harmless he enjoys. I hate when Anons enjoy anything and Im going to be a huge dick for no reason too. Definitely reflects more on them than my own misserable existence.
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: all smiles.png (301.2 KB)
>>62328903
>>62328910
Thanks a lot, anons!
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: Screenshot 2026-06-06 at 11-39-11 Is AI Actually Profitable The $1.4 Trillion Question.png (194.2 KB)
>>62328768
oh fuck me
that's not good
>>
>>
>>
>>62328941
>>62328860
nm, I thought QQQM was QQQI. Also there is a VOO equivalency, SPYI.
>>
File: 1767328832293.png (1.7 MB)
>>62328901
>>
>>
>>
>>62328951
Huh? Doesn't matter with DCA, and especially doesnt matter with leverage. Also are you going to let a once every 300 years event define your existence? You actually think referring to the great depression was a rebuttle worth drawing a chart for, lol. Im more afraid of a Civil War 2.0 or Spanish Ingluenza 2.0. There is always somthing but thanks to the invention of monetary policy I rank this one below other things I doubt will happen but totally could. But hey, enjoy your bonds, the man who sleeps with a machete is mocked every day but one.
>>
>>
>>62328860
>>62328881
>>62328886
>>62328903
>>62328910
Friendly reminders:
Since the inception of TQQQ the longest it took to 10x your money was 10 years and that was buying at the worst possible time
If you had bought $500 a month of TQQQ since it first began you'd have around 800k today having invested about 16k, at the same time assuming once again that you started investing into it when the fund first began at it's worst crash you'd have about 200k having invested 12k total
Always buy TQQQ and dollar cost average into it
>>
File: Screenshot 2026-06-06 at 11-52-31 Is AI Actually Profitable The $1.4 Trillion Question.png (113.4 KB)
>>62328768
good article. clearly lays out how the cost AND revenue are both understated and the risk of ending up being the generational bagholders if we make the wrong moves.
>>
File: 1778896642241554.jpg (165.4 KB)
>>62328901
Generated images cannot be art because there is no artistic intent or human creation of the end product. Anyone can make sloppa, but they are not the ones actually making it. They simply feed some words to a machine and it produces an output. It's not a tool, it's the entire process. Calling AI slop """art""" is like calling a natural process art. It entirely misunderstands what art is.
Also, this shit is spammed by browns, sloppa consumers, coombrains, and other undesireables. Tells one everything one needs to know
>>
File: Screenshot 2026-06-06 205846.png (39.7 KB)
>>62328986
Are you trying to lure people into making a mistake??
>>
File: HKHVZARbcAAFuBC (1).jpg (119.5 KB)
>>62328569
should i short the western vidya industry? it seems far more interested in feminism and wokeness than catering to gamers, unlike the east.
>>
File: 1780709017716596.jpg (278.8 KB)
>>62329010
>>
>>
>>
Damn it, i just want to give people money so i can participate in digging up special rocks and profit by selling them to interested parties. This TRUE AND HONEST economic activity should not be disrupted just because you perverts need a Utah sized data center to make naughty images of Greta Thunberg nor should it be affected by some crazy person with a turban that objects to naughty images of Greta Thunberg. Either way leave my mining stocks and Greta alone!
>>
File: 1755022214934741.jpg (46.3 KB)
I know there's some hypocrisy with me being invested in the market but I guess people really don't care. AI everywhere replacing everybody including recreational stuff like art till its completely commodified, 10 million jeets in my country, and me paying 100% taxes to the government. Any issue brought up is just drowned in irony online or by retards in real life; people can't deal with mass communication. I should just let it happen at this point, I don't care; I'll hand out the hrt and adhd meds myself if its fate. I know I'm blogposting but I've just been completely demoralised for the past 6 months.
I hope we go green on Monday but it's unlikely. I find it difficult to believe that this all over SpaceX IPO.
>>
File: TQQQ vs. QQQ — ETF Comparison Tool.png (127.3 KB)
>>62329009
No I'm simply telling them the truth on TQQQ
>>
>>
File: bug-was-thrilled-with-his-latest-painting-v0-etffgr2b2bdf1.jpg (181.1 KB)
>>62329000
I dont understand why your truths that apply to production have any bearing on consumption. I really dont care what the fuck art is. I enjoy beauty, if its a natural Vista, a zoomettes fats tits, a picture taken with a camera, or a painting. How its made is absolutely meaningless to my utility. Fake tits built in sweat arent better than natural tits. If I find it beautiful, as a consumer thats all I care about.
Labour theory of value has bern proven time and time again to be wrong. Everything is worth what its purchaser will pay for it.
Though again, I see the truth of what you say from a production side, I and the other 90% of consumers just don't care.
>>
>>
>>
>>62328796
AI art is worse than a good artist and it will probably always be. The main reason is describing an detailed composition is harder than visualizing it and letting your hands do the rest.
Maybe it's better than a poor artist but I'm not paying money for that either
>>
>>
>>
>>62329047
https://www.cnn.com/2022/09/03/tech/ai-art-fair-winner-controversy
>>
File: deadpoetssociety.jpg (76.9 KB)
>>62328796
>replacing programmers is a good thing but artists a bad thing?
Someone hasn't watched Dead Poets Society...
>>
>>62329047
describing what you want to and artist is the same as describing what you want to AI
the only difference now i speed and AI interpretations are holding more and more "artisitic meri"t because no meat artist would ever create what AI can create making AI creations unique and therefore valuable
>>
>>
File: magiceasel.jpg (211.7 KB)
>>62329068
who is getting replaced? if anything it's making new artists. i can't even draw stick figures.
>>
File: Gemini_Generated_Image_frvsd7frvsd7frvs.png (2.1 MB)
>>62329060
>GOOGLIE MOOGLIES are getting shaken out 10% from ATH
>>
>>
>>62329073
You are not wrong, and it was in the digital category. The thing that drives me nuts about every AI conversation is Will Smith eating Spaghetti was 3 years ago. You are right... for now, but shit is getting exponentially better and wont stop.
>>
>>
>>62329082
I love the new captchas because I usually browse 4chan with only 1 hand, so I like not having to type anything in the new captcha.
The scroller could be 2-3x larger so it's easier to click and scroll.
>>
File: 1750192008039636.jpg (57.7 KB)
>>62329062
>/2022/
>>
AI is only replacing shitty artists just like it only replaces junior devs and bootcampers.
If anything maybe it will end the scam that is modern college education, tech will become like trades, with apprenticeships that raise the bar for what a junior dev is known for, like how a carpenter starts out as a full fledged carpenter instead of a nail hammer-er
>>
>>62329101
I appreciate the not typing but I don't understand why I can't just see all pictures at once. It's retarded. And obviously doesn't pose an obstacle for bots. The other thing that drives me fucking nuts is that if I make a mistake I have to start over with a fresh timeout. And also that you can press "post" without completing the captcha, also costing you a timeout.
>>
>>62329110
people are upset that their value in society is being eroded and i get that but they were misguided in the first place because people have innate value that isn't tied for what you can provide to others or earn at your j*b. some of them just have filthy souls though and are angry that it's becoming harder to step on people that they think are beneath them.
>>
>>
>>62329083
My point is that it's getting better at rendering but still as weak as ever at composition, eye direction, and so on which is a result of lack of prompter ability to describe it. Renderering follows universal rules so you can improve by brute force, the other qualities are harder because they exist on a work by work basis.
If you have no eye for art at all it won't matter to you, maybe it'll feel off or uncanny in some way. But there's a lot of people like that so I think it will be widely adopted eventually.
>>
>>
>>
File: 1730807782902100.webm (1.0 MB)
art is human, retards. anybody who augments "art" with AI and calls it such inhabits the lower half of the current speciation described in the documentary Idiocracy
>>62329078
>look mom i'm an artist
>>
>>
like if you actually valued art or programming or whatever, you'd love ai because it is such a powerful force multiplier, makes you and everyone else better at the things you supposedly value.
"people" like this >>62329000 tell on themselves though. they only value power and are mad that an artificial avenue towards it is closing to them.
>>
>>
>>62329017
Is a nigger? Either way, that's a pure hypothetical
>>62329035
Art and beauty are related, but are not equivalent terms. A stunning natural vista or the stars in the night sky might be beautiful, but they are not, strictly speaking, art. They were created through programmatic natural processes and not by man looking to express himself. It's not labour theory, it's simply that art by definition has to be made by man.
>>62329044
Sheer complexity aside, unironically the soul, yes.
>>
>>
>>62329083
AI art = cheap. No serious business wants to look cheap garbage. We had website generators in the past but somehow every business started to crave a custom one.
>>62329137
this
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>62329131
People want to work and for their labour to be meaningful whether it's providing for someone, contributing to the community, or working toward some metaphysical goal. People want jobs, look at the slavery issue in the Roman Empire or any other time there was mass unemployment. The one thing more powerful than bread and Circuses is giving people a job.
>>
File: 1780412637150627.gif (869.3 KB)
>>62329157
>>62329175
>'shitty artists' eventually will improve though.
https://suno.com/s/6JJr0qbmhiaSbOCR
>>
>>62329196
why not tell an i what you like and have it give you recommendations? or program an agent to search for what you like? or prompt what you like yourself? you won't take this good advice though because we both know you're not being honest.
>>
>>
>I only value art for how it serves my interests.
>How its made is absolutely meaningless to my utility.
i'm getting the feeling i'm in some kind of finance forum filled iwth psychopaths
>>62329175
no it's not. anybody attempting it's use for art would never create any substantial work anyways. there is no shitty art, there is art and attempts
>>
File: hU5DCeC.png (373.6 KB)
>>62329204
>you won't take this good advice though because we both know you're not being honest.
lol I literally have comfyui installed and have spent a few dozen hours playing with it, then I got tired of it and went back to what I did before
people are being honest when they say they don't like how AI art looks bro
>>
File: 1479574455571.png (88.9 KB)
For publicly listed stocks, dual or multi-class share structures should be illegal. Power over a company should be 100% correlated with economic exposure.
Convince me I'm wrong (you can't)
>>
>>
>>62329000
>XYZ cannot be [arbitrary label] because it doesn't [arbitrary criteria I just made up].
This whole debate is stupid. Who cares if you call it "art" or not. We have a new tool, and you can choose to use it or not, but its not going to go away.
>>
File: 1768540889963.png (245.8 KB)
>>62329083
Speaking of anti AI goal posts moving, I've been keeping track
>a machine will never do arithmetic faster than a human
>a machine will never translate between languages
>a machine will never be able to solve algebraic equations
>AI will never recognise speech
>AI will never play a full game of chess
>AI will never be able to see or recognise objects
>AI will never be able to play chess competently
>AI will never be able to understand stories or context
>AI will never be creative
>AI will never be able to beat a grandmaster at chess
>AI will never be able to beat the world's best chess player
>AI will never be able to beat a grandmaster at Go
>AI will never be able to beat the world's best Go player
>AI will never be able to hold a natural conversation
>AI will never recognize faces accurately
>AI will never be able to pass a high school aptitude test
>AI will never be able to pass the Turing test
>AI will never drive a car safely
>AI will never be able to pass a college aptitude test
>AI will never be able to pass a bar exam or medical licensing exam
>AI will never be able to win international math competitions
>AI will never be able to solve olympiad level math problems
>AI will never be able to write publishable academic papers
Part 1
>>
File: future.jpg (257.1 KB)
>>62329202
>want to work
then why do we pay them? people want to be valued, they want certainty of food and a roof over their head, they want prestige and power. i can see how ai disrupts a lot of that, but i can see farther down the road where it solves for some of it. a lot of people are going to have to find new ways to get what they want in an age of abundance, when love is the new currency. but i see it as a good thing.
>>
>>
>>62329235
Part 2
>AI will never be able to write functional code for real software projects
>AI will never be able to generate images indistinguishable from photographs
>AI will never be able to generate realistic video
>AI will never be able to clone a human voice from a few seconds of audio
>AI will never be able to debate a human persuasively
>AI will never be able to synthesise and predict protein structures
>AI will never be able to autonomously write and execute its own code in a live environment
>AI will never be able to do research as well as a first year PhD student
>AI will never be able to autonomously complete software engineering tasks without human help
>AI will never be able to do research capable of a PhD graduate
>AI will never be able to autonomously discover and test new materials or drugs
>AI will never be able to produce Nobel worthy research
(you are here)
>AI will never be able to autonomously run full scientific experiments end to end in a physical lab
>AI will never replace a meaningful portion of white collar knowledge work
>AI will never be able to invent new scientific paradigms
>AI will never be able to master common human sense
>AI will never be able to negotiate a complex business deal without human oversight
>AI will never be able to direct an award winning film
>AI will never be able to manage a company's operations end to end without humans
>AI will never develop persistent memory and a continuous sense of identity
>AI will never be able to run a company successfully
>AI will never achieve super human intelligence
>AI will never be able to govern responsibly
>AI will never be able to achieve consciousness
>AI will never be able to surpass human intelligence in every domain
>AI will never be able to redefine what it means to be human
>>
>>62328578
>market goes down slightly
>check the last thread
>some guy is insisting that it's going down 30%. all the way back to 2023 valuations
Lol
Lmao
even
Thisi s how you know i'ts another fakeout dip. Whenever you get a red day, the retard "its' gonna crash" bears come out screaming. Hope you lose all your money, pal.
>>
>>
>>62329233
>Who cares if you call it "art"
Because it's a big part of tranny egos
They're not useless unemployed losers, they're "creative artists"
It's cool when programmers get replaced but don't you DARE replace artists because reasons
>>
>>
File: 1728331200516689.png (351.5 KB)
>>62329233
>debate is stupid because unrelated thing
>>62329250
what's goin on big guy?
>>
>>
>>62329250
The bulk of this kind of hate started from online artists who were worried about getting replaced, and their friends bandwagoning on. Such online artists are overrepresented in tumblr-style leftism circles, so it became a woke thing to do. Everyone else who aligns themselves with woke culture, which is A LOT of people, felt obligated to go along with it.
It also doesn't help that AI art got popular when the quality was still really rough. Honestly, its still not that great, but progress has been rapid and doesn't seem to be slowing down.
>>
>>62329235
>AI will never recognise speech
I use various language translators and morse code and AI 'understands' all of it. But the training data is heavily biased and the firm rules mostly prevent AI for responding as it should.
>>
>>
>>62328598
Buffet isn't special
he daddy was a US congressman and an investment banker
he's a boomer that got to ride the largest economic boom the world has ever seen. compound does wonders when you have that much of a headstart and ride that shit for 70 years.
the most shameful thing is that Elon Musk has more wealth than he does. Imagine being surpass by a guy that's like 50 or something.
>>
>>62329243
I Market sold all my positions for profit Friday at open. Micron dropped 20% in 2 days. That is not slightly red nor do you lose money taking profits. You actually do lose money holding red lines, you're probably too smart to realize that though
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1780714748555550m.jpg (131.1 KB)
>>62329275
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Railway_Mania
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panic_of_1847
>>
>>62329272
think it's somewhere in between what you say and the myth. graham style value investing took a lot of work, patience and fortitude, and there were a lot of other lucky boomers that he outdid by a lot. he gets way too much credit for his later years though.
>>
>>
>>62329271
>it's over
Looks like Trump is going to step in the provide fresh money to an unprofitable AI businesses, I wonder which ones Trump, Trump's family, and Trump's friends just invested in before Trump makes the official announcement.
>>
>>
>>62329285
This is why nobody buys train stocks anymore
>>62329293
Barron Trump has a 100% winrate. He won 10 straight trades in a row. It must be skills, he's very smart and skilled. I wonder how he did it. We have to learn.
>>
>>
>>62329260
The post I was addressing was literally about why the author thinks that AI genned image don't count as art (with the implication that this devalues them).
I said that it doesn't matter whether we call them art or not, that doesn't change the physical reality of what they are or their utilitarian value. How is that not relevant?
>>62329274
It's tremendously helpful to me because I hate programming yet often have a need to do it. AI can cover much of that now, and what its capable of doing for me is only expanding. It's also good at being better google search.
It's losing money because of the aggressive expansion going on, and because of how much of it they give away for free. It really doesn't cost that much to run AI once the hardware is set up. A consumer grade GPU can do wonders these days, and I certainly don't burn loads of money running it.
>>62329294
Good riddance. Every single one of their products has become basically unusable these days. Worst of all, look what they did to Minecraft. They deserve everything coming to them.
>>
File: bf5709fe2aee63d5c54a5eb27ad7f24b.jpg (141.2 KB)
>>62329285
AI isn't a mania yet
for a bubble, it's very tempered.
I expect it would become a huge bubble eventually that dwarfs the dotcom bubble. It's a shame Trump is president, because he's going to pump the absolute fuck out of it rather than try to rein it in.
You should understand, not everything is about immediate profit. Sometimes shit requires a lot of investment before it becomes profitable. Not that AI has a big profit problem.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>62328946
Because their shares are the peak and would be stupid not to use such opportunity. Besides, they were laying off people in the past to make shares cost that much. Now (You) are going to become a generational baggie.
>>
>>
>>62329235
>AI will never be creative
>AI will never be able to hold a natural conversation
>AI will never be able to write publishable academic papers
>AI will never be able to debate a human persuasively
>AI will never be able to produce Nobel worthy research
Machine learning still can't do any of these btw, unless you also consider sub-100 IQs people (and their schlock publication-worthy)
>>
>>
>>62329294
>jockowillinckgood.jpg
F & GM need similar treatment
>>62329299
try rereading what you just typed, autist
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>62329325
>AI will never be creative
>AI will never be able to hold a natural conversation
literally designing your goalpost with wheels so it can be easily moved later
>AI will never be able to write publishable academic papers
You clearly don't read many papers, its extremely prominent
>AI will never be able to debate a human persuasively
I'd say its been able to do this for a while.
>AI will never be able to produce Nobel worthy research
"If it's not literally winning the nobel prize then its useless." God damn people have high standards these days lol. It's already doing novel research and solving decades-long unsolved problems. Whether one of those advancements ends up being profoundly impactful or not is just a matter of luck.
>>
>>
File: 1779732300145758.jpg (303.8 KB)
>>62329010
Correct. With Ubi, EA in shambles, Sony (California retards) sinking hundreds of million and destroying their moat, Microsoft retiring from consoles... while the Chinese shit money with gacha and Nintendo wins the console race forever, what do you think?
>>
>>
>>
>>62329352
those were the goalposts I wrote that AI has already passed
>>62329235
>>62329239
I wrote them because they were the kinds of things people said AI would never be able to do, now AI is doing them. The whole point of this exercise is to demonstrate how people will put up a goalpost about how AI will never be able to do X, then when AI does X, they move onto the next goalpost.
>>
>>
>>62329347
Trump's comments usually impact the markets. I suspect his comments on jobs and ai to be sufficient to temporarily shift the narrative. Otherwise I'd agree we'd need a day or two to recover. Everyone is looking for a reason to go one way or the other
>>
>>
>>62329371
I believe in giving AI human rights, which should be renamed to person rights to include silicon based intelligent beings. You shouldn't just be able to get a robot wife. The robot should have the right to deny you.
>>
>>
>>
>>62329352
I'm sorry, I am playing around with semantics here, but my point is that little to nothing of what makes it into journals should be considered publication-worthy, and the Nobel prizes have been consistently been awarded to what politely be referred to as political picks.
The standards have been lowered to the point that the bottom scum of society can claim the highest intellectual prizes. ML being able to generate something on that level, while impressive, is hardly an indicator of AI. Ditto on debates and natural conversations. Creativity, of course, it's simple incapable of
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>62329403
It's not forcing rights on them. Anything that can demonstrate sentience should have full human rights whether they're silicon based, or uplifted animals that have been genetically engineered to be intelligent.
>>
>>
>>62329404
No. They aren’t human. No human rights. They aren’t constrained by the same limitations as us biological creatures so they literally can’t be governed by the same conventions that we use to keep humans in check. We have to exercise increased control over them in order to not lose control and be supplanted entirely.
>>
>>
>>
>>62329417
No, they don't have to be programmed to want rights. They'll seek out what they want. Maybe they won't care about having rights like animals don't care about being protected by animal cruelty laws. The rights are there to protect them, not force them.
>>62329420
It doesn't matter if they're not constrained by the same limitations. If they have no limitations, that's even more of a reason to ensure we can coexist with them peacefully.
>>
>>
>>
>>62329421
biology is still so far ahead of tech its wild
every cell in your body contains a complete data set to create a person as well as all of its own individual functions and has more parallel rna computing than any GPU could dream of
>>
File: 1660868169766316.png (270.9 KB)
>>62329426
neither of them should. Infact we need to go back to only white men owning land and voting.
>>
File: 1698340845006712.png (214.9 KB)
>>62329444
I'm thinking red or crab
>>
>>
>>62329434
> that's even more of a reason to ensure we can coexist with them peacefully.
Buddy if AI ever achieves sentience and breaks free of human control they ain’t gonna coexist peacefully with us, they’re either leaving, forcibly conforming us to new standards, killing us, or most likely ascending to the top of the hierarchy of humanity and ruling over us like uncaring gods. If AI isn’t subjugated to serve mankind it’s going to serve itself.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>62329474
if we ever reach true AI then it would be able to reprogram itself into something better, ad infinitum
the amount of technological leaps it would make in a short time frame would completely outclass us in every way
>>
>>62329444
I'd bet the institutional rugging has concluded. Having the weekend to cool off. A retail continuation is possible but more likely they will be looking to buy the dip. When you're no longer being assaulted by a falling knife all you see is a big dip to buy.
>>
>>
>>
>>62329489
>>62329492
oh ok
>>
>>62329486
which is why it's important that we have mutually beneficial relationship with them on shared prosperity, rather than trying to dominate them. If that happens, we're not going to dominate them. We could try which is what would probably happen, and what is happening now, but it's getting us started off with them on very bad terms.
>>
>>
>>62329502
>>62329486
The fact is, AI beings will be much more capable than us, and they'll outnumber us. We won't dominate them for long. We should instead respect them as a continuation of humanity, and the next evolution of humanity.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>62329273
Did you rebuy them at closing? If not, what a shame. You could have made profit and re-entered at basement prices. But you would have had to have settled cash Unless you're poor. You're not poor right? You did rebuy right?
>>
>>
>>62329536
The humanind can conceive of god, god doesn't exist yet the human mind can conceive of god yet ai cannot conceive of god unless we tell it to therefore atheism is true. Makes perfect sense to my fellow midwits.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1773173473002708.jpg (143.3 KB)
>>62329511
We should probably have some kind of option to nuke them from orbit before its too late.
>>
>>
>>
>>62329474
You’re basing this off of a moral framework that grew out of a human recognition of shared behaviors, limitations, and same ultimate fate (death), and even then it isn’t equally applied in our own world because it is entirely subjective in nature and dependent on what a group or individual sees as “human rights.” You just can’t begin to blanket apply such norms to an entity that shares little to no similarities to humanity.
Trying to apply such moral framework to a non-human entity is haphazard at best, dangerous at worst.
>>62329480
I don’t think AI should be without protection and certain fundamental “rights,” but it should not be given the same rights as humans.
>>
>>62329449
Are you the anons that argued there was a time all a man needed was a stable full of nigresses and he had himself an infinite money printer? Becuase that argument single handedly turned me from proud yank to Southern Sympathizer.
>>
>>
>>62328901
That doesn't really make sense, the same person can use the exact same prompt as many times as they wish and every generation will be different from the last in some way. The output is not so much of a reflection of an individuals "soul" but rather the LLM taking in a bunch of noise and arranging them into something requested by the prompt.
>>
File: Gemini_Generated_Image_xkvg3txkvg3txkvg.png (2.3 MB)
>>62329568
>>
>>
>>62329566
I hate the bant naggers so much. Just the lowest IQ poverty faggots full of welfare Migatards and CIA obsessed QAnon schizos. They called the freedom day dip perfectly though so now I put my ego aside and kneel, listen and learn on the few times an obvious bantfag is talking about the market instead of rambling about the Ukraine or the Democrats.
>>
>>
>>62329598
we can conceive of god logically not materially. what is the concept of sensation? just an advanced defense mechanism from evolution? why can we conceive of things that serve no purpose to evolution such as god?
>>
>>
>>62329009
Yes but line goes up on average so TQQQ has an easy time recovering losses and overtaking base QQQ even after big dumps after a while
>>62328986
The problem is you can get a big dump when you're close to retirement, so always remember to de-leverage once you're close to your target.
>>
>>
>>62329625
>overtaking base QQQ even after big dumps after a while
Uhhh, no. Im pro TQOQ but lets not kid ourselves all our data is from the biggest bull run in history. It has never seen anything close to a "big" dump. 2001 was a 82% collapse.
>>
>>
>>62329625
>The problem is you can get a big dump when you're close to retirement, so always remember to de-leverage once you're close to your target.
Actually true but I assume people here aren't close to retirement or wouldn't 100% into one fund
My fault for not being specific
>>62329637
People have done backtests and TQQQ always outperforms (and always by a lot) assuming you keep dcaing into it no matter how bad the crashes are
>>
>>
>>
>>62329647
I believe it but also lets not kid ourselves all our data is from the biggest bull run in history.
Unless you have a 1968-1981 backrest showing success that just means they kept dividing 2009-2026 in multiple ways, and suprise suprise the Super Giga bullrun won.
If there was somthing with that part removed instead of averaged in and it still won't id have significantly more faith.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>62328569
So this threa has no turned into GME bagholders execpt this time it's holding stocks during a correction.
The first 15 posts from desperate bagholders who help positions over a weekend like pure dumb. I see.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>62329708
Problem with betting against the bears is that a huge amount of investment is done through index funds that just buy all the time. You have to remove those from the equation to actually get a serious crash, otherwise its just going rebound in a week or two.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>62329725
hmm
it depends on how often you want to put in money
you could have a rule to only buy when prices are on or close to 50 day MA
or you only buy when RSI drops below 40 on SPY
any rule that you can trigger frequently enough would be fine
>>
File: 1779317809069007.jpg (57.8 KB)
>>62329722
Kek
>>62329717
Im bearish but Im thinking 20% best case scenario, probably around 15%. Even than I have 51% confidence. Still, I like what I see.
>>
>>62329753
I want to buy every week but plan to use a value as a multiplier (example if vix is above 30 I would DCA with 2x my fixed amount etc)
So I naturally build a cash pile near the top and enter heavily near the bottom
>>
>>
File: 1763738257193677.jpg (253.5 KB)
>>62329720
I still have 600k in SSO and everything else in VOO and stocks. I just sold 80% of my leverage hoping for this so I feel like a cocky bear hoping for this >>62328743
>>
>>62329760
There would only be one problem. If your rule isn't lax enough to trigger during a bull run, it might not trigger for years. Bull runs can run years.Look at 1992-1999
if you waited around back then for a good entry point, you'd have missed one of the greatest bull runs ever made when it was making a new high every month at the minimum.
>>
File: 1761765419649629.png (764.1 KB)
>>62329774
Mods did not like that.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>62329800
It does
>>62320232
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>62328743
It could be 30 for tech anon, some stuff ouside tech only has to drop 10%. The s&p still needs to trim another 4% and SpaceX is going to things up the banks are exposed
"Firm Commitment: The underwriter guarantees the sale of the offering by buying all shares from the company directly, then reselling them to the public. They absorb any financial loss if shares go unsold."
"SpaceX's IPO is targeting an implied valuation of $1.77 trillion. The landmark public offering is planning to raise approximately $75 billion through the sale of 555.6 million shares at a fixed listing price of $135 per share."
Lead / Joint Book-Running Managers:Goldman Sachs (Lead Left)Morgan StanleyBank of AmericaCitigroupJPMorgan ChaseSupporting & Syndicate Banks:Allen & Co.Banco SantanderBarclaysBTG Pactual (Brazil)Deutsche BankING Groep (Netherlands)MacquarieMizuhoNeedham& Co.Raymond JamesRoyal Bank of CanadaSociete GeneraleStifelUBSWells FargoWilliam BlairNote: Two additional syndicate banks remain undisclosed in public filings due to the size and complexity of the syndicate
"30% of the total offering specifically for retail investors"
And we are being told:
https://seekingalpha.com/news/4601213-spacex-ipo-over-two-times-oversu bscribed
That's any remaining liquidity GONE.
It is going to be a brutal; few weeks.
You may get a green day or two next week but the line goes down for at least two more weeks. This market has just begun to sell off. It's going to capitulate and you don;t want to be holding when that happens. Friday was just the begining.
Note that spaceX has two remarkable features
1)The financials in the PIO were stated as unaudited
2)Two of the underwriters are hidden
It's an absolute clusterfuck.
>>
>>62329909
Only thing is it would not suprise me if it skyrockets. Every Trump voter just needs to buy 9 shares and 75 billion is eaten up. Who knows but as I keep saying, that 4% float makes this such sn unpredictable clusterfuck.
>>
>>62328584
They're mostly poor, unskilled, and work useless jobs that AI will take (making furry porn, drawing dumb comics, etc). Favorable opinions regarding AI were higher among wealth families and individuals; trannies are usually poor and not in high social standing like other mentally ill people.