>>77119325
we're ugly resentful incels, we have to go huge

File: chillku.png (231.1 KB)

231.1 KB PNG

>>77119325
The best is somewhere between both.

>noble masculine
>look inside
>its actually just feminine

>>77119325
ever considered the chance youre a raging faggot?

File: images (1).jpg (29.5 KB)

29.5 KB JPG

>ever considered the chance youre a raging faggot?

>>77119325
I cant help it Im just a gay bear trying to impress my bros and imagine them fucking me in the ass!!!

So true. Only roidsissies will disagree.

>>77119325
There's nothing to refute, this is someone arguing a subjective preference and calling it something provocative.

>>77119325
You're allowed to be attracted to whatever kind of male you want OP, just take it to >>>/lgbt/ where it belongs
Besides I like bears desu

>>77119757
Oh also
>noble
>literally a photo from a Ralph Lauren catalog
Just say prep vs. jock, it's what you really mean.

Roiding is a shortcut for lazy faggots, and they justifiably look like garbage at the end of it.

/fit/ will seethe, but this has been true for 2 decades on this gay board. They used to call this place "Health & Fitness", now it's full of roidtrannies spreading their malignant, retarded ideas. A whole generation that was born after me but will die long before me, proving that there is a god.

>>77119768
Cool story bro, what's that got to do with the post tho?

>>77119771
>whole thread is about roidtrannies seething
>"but what does roidtrannies seething have to do with the post?"

Keep seething, faggot. You'll be dilating soon enough.

>>77119775
The thread is about people with different body types
You brought up roids out of nowhere because you wanted something to be mad at
I ask you again, more clearly this time: what do roids have to do with OP preferring a different gay male body type?

>>77119768
>>77119775
post physique

steroids are a gateway drug to becoming a tranny

File: 22.jpg (53 KB)

53 KB JPG

>22 year old and you look like you're in your 50s
LMAO fucking roiders....

>>77119325
>/fit/ cannot refute this.
What's there to refute? Natties on the right, roidies on the left.

>>77119325
You can still be pretty big and be right. Just don't go mass monster pug mode. Keep your hairline, don't have a ratty beard.

The problem is people get too lost in the woods and start fetishizing features that no-one actually finds attractive like vascularity, workman hands, traps that push into your ears, coarse body hair. Like there's an anon recently who keeps making threads asking how to turn his hands into clubbed boulders.

It's easy to see how so many women are oblivious to what men find hot and end up wondering why they are single with dyed black bowl hair cuts, tattoos and shoulder padded blazers when lots of men do the same.

>>77119325
>>77119352
This image would have a lot more impact and traction if everything on the right wasn't so gay. If whoever made this tempered it just a little it would have been better.

>>77119836
*Though i'll caveat that a lot of the left is driven by an increasing race to the bottom street cred culture society.

Especially in the UK you see a lot more of the left and it's a result of everyone getting poorer, more concentrated and having to prove themselves at every chance to be king of the dirt pile. Women may not visually like the left but above all women like a man who dominates other men. In a one on one situation the guys to the left are likely to be be seen as more violent and unstable to people on the right and so on that immediate, street level interaction, will be given the platform. In turn at that same level they will get female attention. So leading more men to think the left is what wins women over.

>>77119325
The reason is that the "noble masculine" is the traditional phenotype for the warrior/aristocrat class, and so is associated with nobility. It is unironically better for combat and more functional than the fat roidmonkey look that low-class people think is "masculine".

>>77119325
roid TRANNIES cannot be masculine. qed, chud.

>>77119777
the pic is roids vs. no roids

>>77119325
>Ugly bloat orges versus zesty victim weight twinks
I easily refute this by being a straight guy who does skincare and stays lean overweight, but doesn't do zesty supposed "loosmax" surgeries/injections or bulk to the point of needing a CPAP, shrimple as.

>>77119911
You refer to men as having "victim weight." You are not straight.

>>77119921
>victim w8
You're excluded if you're a manlet like Israetel, but if your a lanklet under 200lbs I think you're ack-shilly the zesty one...

File: frank-zane-measurements.jpg (202 KB)

202 KB JPG

>>77119325
>Tfw vulgar enough to not be faggy yet noble enough to not be ugly
Zane had it right.

File: Dimas.jpg (214.2 KB)

214.2 KB JPG

There is a third path.

>>77119901
Well no, it's bears and twunks. Nowhere in the image is there anything mentioned about roids. You brought them up out of nowhere. I'll ask one more time, because I really want to give you the benefit of the doubt and not assume you have down syndrome: what do roids have to do with OP preferring a different gay male body type?

>>77119842
If the fag who made this just replaced the two dudes in tights with another pic, it would be a lot better

>>77120162
That's just the right

>>77119325
>Get to noble masculinity natty
>Bulk with roids
>Obtain Vulgar Masculinity
This is my plan

>>77120194
so first you want to look gay and then you want to become gay?

>>77120197
Yes.

>>77120168
one body type is on roids and the other isn't

>>77120276
Prove it.

>>77120276
>Nowhere in the image is there anything mentioned about roids. You brought them up out of nowhere.
So you are retarded, got it.

>>77120341
Well no, it's roids. Nowhere in the image is there anything mentioned about bears and twunks either. You brought them up out of your own latent homosexuality. I'll ask one more time, because I really want to give you the benefit of the doubt and not assume you have Down syndrome: what do gay male body types have to do with OP preferring a natural physique?

File: freecompress-1000017345 (1).mp4 (1.3 MB)

1.3 MB MP4

>>77119325
always has been.

>>77120410
such a young man...

>>77120410
At first I thought maybe he was just a youthful looking man, since he was on a motorcycle. But then my jaw dropped in amazement when I see him skip and jump as if he were a teenager.

>>77119325
Refute what? You've made no claims, just posted a variety of half-naked men. Homo.

File: tom-hardy-warrior-tom-hardy-29606362-828-9601.jpg (75.5 KB)

75.5 KB JPG

Cope

>>77119325
Why not in between?

>>77119325
Basically
-have hair (enough to comb)
-be lean but healthy
-have decent skin (no accelerated aging from roids)
-don't do tryhard poses

>>77120383
>Nowhere in the image is there anything mentioned about bears and twunks either.
>vulgar masculinity
>noble masculinity
you already proved you're retarded, you didn't need to double down